If You Didn’t See it, It Didn’t Happen
Over the years, at Sword of the Lord conferences and Bible conferences, I heard Jack Hyles make this statement. When Hyles was accused of having an illicit relationship with his secretary, it is this very line he and his followers used. This, If You Didn’t See it, It Didn’t Happen, thinking was taught to countless pastors at Pastor’s School and Hyles-Anderson College. These Hyles trained men carried this thinking home to the churches they pastored and used it to rebuff accusations of impropriety and immorality.
This is the argument that one commenter has used about Bethany Leonard’s accusations against Pastor Bill Wininger. Since the abuse occurred almost two decades ago, there is no physical proof that Wininger sexually molested Bethany Leonard. While others have now come forward and added their name to the accusations, they too have produced no hard, physical evidence to prove their claims.
According to this commenter, since there is no actual physical evidence, it is likely the abuse never happened. According to him, Bethany Leonard and others are lying and are out to ruin a man of God. In his mind, since there is no Monica Lewinsky blue dress, any claims of abuse should be rejected out of hand.
This is the same kind of argument that Ken Ham uses when ignoring the overwhelming evidence for evolution and the age of the universe being billions of years old rather than thousands of years old. Countless Evangelicals have been swayed by Ham’s Jack Hyles impersonation when he says, were you there? Since none of us were there when the earth was birthed into existence, we can not know how old the earth and the human race is. We should accept what God says in his inspired, infallible, inerrant Word, that the earth is 6,017 years old. (based on Ussher’s chronology) In fact, according to Bishop Ussher, creation began on the “nightfall preceding 23 October 4004 BC.”
While this kind of thinking sounds insane to people who are not Evangelical, millions of American Evangelicals believe, like Ken Ham, since none of us were there, we must accept what the Bible says about the beginning of the universe. Never mind the fact that the writers of the book of Genesis weren’t there either. The oldest manuscripts, which are not the originals, are dated thousands of years after the events recorded in Genesis. Even if Moses actually wrote the book of Genesis, and we have no evidence for this other than the BIBLE says so, he would have written the book of Genesis thousands of years after the events recorded in Genesis. In other words, Moses or whoever the authors were weren’t there at the moment of creation, so how can they know what happened?
The commenter I mentioned earlier refuses to believe that Bill Wininger sexually abused Bethany Leonard because there is no physical evidence to prove Leonard’s claims. No one saw it, there is no proof of it, so it didn’t happen.
I wonder if this commenter, and others who think like this, realize the huge problem they are creating for themselves. As Christians, they believe:
- Jesus came to earth and was born of a virgin
- Jesus worked miracles in Palestine over 1,980 years ago
- Jesus was crucified on the cross
- Jesus resurrected from the dead 3 days later
- Jesus ascended into the clouds and left the earth 40 days after he resurrected from the dead
Every Christian believes these things to be facts, yet there is no evidence for any of these claims. None. Nada. Zip. Using the commenters objection to Bill Wininger being considered a child molester, should he not refrain from calling himself a Christian or evangelizing others in hope that they will put their faith in Jesus? Where is the evidence?
When it comes to Bethany Leonard and the others who are claiming they were abused, we have living people who can be questioned. Yet, according to the one commenter, their claims should be rejected. Their testimony, which Leonard has put in written form, can be read by everyone, yet, because there is no physical evidence, the claims must be rejected out of hand. Why is this same rationale NOT applied to the Bible and the claims Evangelicals make for Jesus?
I can know Bethany Leonard wrote a letter about Bill Wininger abusing her, however I have no way of knowing who wrote the various books of the New Testament. I wasn’t there, to use Ken Ham’s illogical logic, and I didn’t see it so it must not have happened, to use Jack Hyles’s illogical logic. Surely, this is one of those what is good for the goose is good for the gander moments.
So, please explain to me, how it is reasonable and rational to reject Bethany Leonard’s claim out of hand but not apply the same thinking to the claims made for Jesus that I mentioned above?
Or, can reasonable people put their faith in Bethany Leonard and the others and come to the conclusion that they are telling the truth, just as the Christian would do concerning the historic witness of the Christian church concerning the claims the Bible makes for Jesus Christ.
Why are people like the commenter mentioned above so willing to accept what they are told about Jesus, a Jesus they have never met, never seen, and for which there is no physical evidence for, yet when a few women say, this man abused me, their claims are rejected out of hand?
Simply put, you can’t have it both ways.