They Come From a Storybook

grimm characters

Bethany (my 25-year-old daughter with Down Syndrome) and I religiously watch the hit TV show Grimm.  Along with Captain America, Rascal Flatts, and Sleepy Hollow, Bethany loves Grimm. She is quite intense when she watches the show and can easily recite to anyone who asks (or doesn’t ask) the Grimm storyline, complete with character descriptions.

One of the problems Bethany has is that she has a hard time distinguishing between fact and fiction. As we were watching Grimm last week, Bethany asked, they are all real, right? I snickered a bit, and then told her, no, they are not real. They come from a storybook.

Later in the week, I was watching a crime procedural show and one of the characters explained how it is possible for a large number of people to testify to a certain event happening. The detective said:

People make things up and it is told over and over. Eventually it becomes common knowledge.

And then I thought to myself, just like the stories in the Bible.

I can just imagine an Evangelical preacher reading this post and doing this while screaming:

jumping man

THE BIBLE IS DIFFERENT!!! In what way is the Bible different? Think on this question before trying to defend the Bible as a historically accurate, factual book. Do we have any more evidence for the Jesus of the Bible than we do the fictional creatures in Grimm? While there may have been a man named Jesus that lived and died in Palestine during the period recorded in the gospels, is there any evidence for a Jesus that was the miracle-working, divine, son of God?

Just because people say something is so doesn’t mean it is factual or true. An Evangelical preacher is simply following the path described by the detective. He is repeating a story that has been told over, and over, and over again. And as with the telephone game, the Jesus story of the 21st century is wildly different from the Jesus story of the first, second, twelfth, or fifteenth century.

Evangelicals embarrass themselves when they assert without knowledge that what they believe is exactly the same as what the early New Testament church believed. What is their evidence for this claim? Why the passed-down story of Jesus, passed down from Christian to Christian, sect to sect.

I am an avid reader of Smithsonian Magazine. Every month I learn something I didn’t know before. In the January 2015 issue, I learned from an article about Martin Luther King, Jr. that “King and his demonstrators were driven out of Selma by the police on “Bloody Sunday.” I also learned that the Watt Riots took place in 1967.

Imagine for a moment that I am telling my children about my life growing up in the 1960’s. Imagine me saying to them, I remember seeing the Watts Riots on TV in 1967. My children would accept this as a fact because they know I was born in 1957, so I was alive during the race riots of the 1960s. Perhaps, they would pass this on to their children, a story of how life was when Gramps was a kid. Think on this for a moment.

The February 2015 edition of Smithsonian came a few days ago. In the Discussion section was a correction. King was not in Selma on Bloody Sunday. He arrive two days later. The Watts Riots? They took place in 1965, not 1967.

Now ponder how the stories of the Bible came into being and why people repeat them and believe them today.

040816

print

Subscribe to the Daily Post Digest!

Sign up now and receive an email every day containing the new posts for that day.

I agree to have my personal information transfered to MailChimp ( more information )

I will never give away, trade or sell your email address. You can unsubscribe at any time.

Powered by Optin Forms

4 Comments

  1. Steve

    It’s unreal, man. Dr. Ehrman really exposes all of this in his books too, (as you already know:)

    Reply
  2. Zoe

    Great example re: the correction. The thing is the whole infallible thing gets in the way of most people taking a closer look.

    Reply
  3. Geoff

    I read a book of fiction some while back that was heavily dependent on the history of Grimms Fairytales. Like the best fiction, it was factually very accurate (I checked).

    The tales themselves were based on stories collected from travelling round towns and villages in Germany, listening to the old tales that had been handed down through the generations. Nobody, as far as I’m aware, regarded them as true, albeit some may have been based on the odd real event from many years past.

    One fact that really hit me was the frequent use of ‘step mother’, a character very much still associated with these types of story. Apparently, in the original stories the Grimms used ‘mothers’ as the source of the evil, and witchcraft kind behaviour. After the first stories were published, however, readers rebelled, saying that no real mother would ever behave like that, and so the Grimms invented ‘step mothers’.

    I wonder how much of the highly unlikely bible myths were actually manipulated this way?

    Reply
  4. Middle-ager Deconverter

    We enjoy Grimm, too. Liked Sleepy Hollow until the recent Season Finale… This article– Excellent explanation. Love the mini-man of God jumping in righteous indignation at the mere questioning of the Bible’s infallibility. If only more folks would find your blog or read a little of Bart Ehrman, they would be on the road to real discernment and truth. Once one knows it, it cannot be unlearned.

    Reply

Leave a Comment

You have to agree to the comment policy.