Know-it-all Christians

know it all

If there is one thing that eight years of blogging has taught me, it is that many Evangelicals are know-it-alls. Armed with a perfect Bible and indwelt by the Holy Spirit, these super-saints have life figured out. They KNOW they are right and they KNOW I am wrong. And based on having the ability to discern the thoughts and motivations of others, they stand in judgment over those who have left the Christian faith.

Take Britta, a local pastor’s daughter. Several years ago, Britta stopped by and left a comment that revealed she knew exactly what was wrong with Bruce Gerencser, the pastor-turned-atheist. What follows is her comment and my response (indented and italicized):

All grammar and spelling errors in the original.

Hi Bruce – I think I see how you ended up here. I’ve not read all of your posts, but it seems that your path is similar to a lot of folks: entrenched in some legalistic sect (borderline cults, really), then fleeing from that absurd burden you are comforted by those espousing that “the well is poisoned” (liberals of the old mainline groups), until finally you have to ditch it all. I can’t say I blame you too much – it’s exhausting to be tossed about on every wave.

Britta read all of about 15 posts on this site. Based on these posts, she was quickly able to discern what I was really all about. This is truly amazing, I must say. Many Christians have a magical gift of being able to pass judgment on most anybody, using the slimmest of information. Of course, this is the opposite of what the Bible teaches. Proverbs 18:13 states: He that answereth a matter before he heareth it, it is folly and shame unto him. A Christian should never make any judgment before hearing (reading) the whole story.

But I don’t believe that you’re an athiest. Sure, you say you don’t believe in the God of the Bible, but you do believe in a god. You. Perfectly reasonable, actually. There is no other choice. I know that know other god is going to show up and pronounce himself as such — and you know it, too, despite your protestations — and so you get to stay god of your world. Tah-dah! (Atheism is really disingenuous.)

Britta evidently thinks that there is no such thing as an atheist. All people either believe in the Christian God or they are their own God. Atheists need not apply.

No matter how many times Christians like Britta assert that there is no such thing as an atheist — here we are. And our numbers are growing. Pretending something doesn’t exist doesn’t make it so.

If by God, Britta means the person in control, then yes, I am my own God. It is my life, who else would be in control of it but me?

Christians are no different. Oh, they “say” God is in control of their lives, but they, for the most part, don’t live any differently from atheists. Are Christians morally superior to atheists? The evidence suggests they are not. Day in and day out, Christians and atheists alike live their lives the best they know how. Christians are every bit as much the “God” of their world as is the atheist (contrary to what the Bible says). Christians speak about a God who is in control of everything, but then turn around and live their lives as if this God is not in control at all (except for an occasional winning touchdown or election win).

Maybe I’m being too harsh. Perhaps, despite your own time in the pulpit, you never understood the simplicity of grace. It really is foolishness to the perishing, but life to those being saved, so here ’tis, for good measure:

Britta finally gets down to what she really thinks about my life: despite 50 years in the Christian church and 25 years in the pastorate, I never really understood the simplicity of grace.

Of course the unstated point here is that Britta understands what I do not. She proves her point by loosely quoting a Bible verse. It is all foolishness to me because I am perishing (lost, headed for hell). It is life to her because she is one of the saved (or one that is being saved).

You (and me and all of us) are not perfect. A God worth worshiping IS perfect. Perfection rightly demands perfection, and since none of us can attain perfection, God offered himself in our place to be that perfection. Nothing we do merits his gift. All we have to do is accept it — that is, bend a knee and admit that we are lost without God and his gift of grace.

Britta and I agree on one thing: none of us is perfect. However, Britta’s comment betrays an arrogance found among many Christians. While their behavior may not be perfect, they arrogantly think that their interpretation of the Bible is.

Britta asserts that God is perfect. What proof does she have for her claim? The Bible? Surely not. By examining how God reveals himself through the Bible, we humans can quickly discern that God is far from perfect.  In fact, God is quite capricious. He even changes his mind. I would think a perfect deity would get it right the first time. God fucked it up from the start. He couldn’t even get creation right.

Evidently Britta has not read the book of James. James contradicts Britta’s assertion that salvation is a free gift and that all we have to do is receive it. James says that faith without works is dead. So which is it? Faith alone? Faith plus works?

(And I should add that Britta does a poor job presenting the Christian gospel. Her presentation is incomplete, to say the least.)

It’s an easy burden — but the crank legalist won’t allow it, neither will an ersatz intellectual grasp it. I’m sorry both camps have been so hard on you. (Really, I am sorry – no snark.) It takes the Spirit of God to discern things of the spirit. I’ll pray that God will open His Word to you.

Britta betrays the true nature of much of modern Christianity. It is nothing more than good, old-fashioned Gnosticism. You see, a person can’t discern the Bible and the things of the Spirit unless the Spirit of God gives them the ability to do so. On one hand, people are told they must repent and believe the gospel, but on the other hand they are told they can’t even discern what God wants unless God gives them the ability to do so.

Britta thinks she has a special, inside track with God. She is praying that God will open up the Bible to me. What is God going to show me that I haven’t already seen?  Is there some secret message, some special code that has somehow eluded me all these years? How will I know if God opens up the Bible to me? Will I start speaking Aramaic Greek?

I wish you the best, sir…
Britta

What if “best” is where I am now? Does Britta genuinely wish me the best? Of course not. There is no “best” without Jesus (or Britta’s version of Jesus).

Next up is a comment from a young Christian named Jason. Jason commented on a post I wrote about the Bible teaching different plans of salvation. Here’s what he had to say:

I have no doubt that there are “Christians” that don’t understand a lot. Many of them, as you say, may be inclined to blindly follow. However, I don’t agree that this is true of most or any “real” Christians. Those actively reading God’s word and being involved in church groups would not follow these categories. The “Christians” you are referring to in these statements are the ones who are simply professing Christians.

Right away Jason lets me know that there are two types of Christians: professing Christians and REAL Christians. Of course, Jason is a REAL Christian. I find it interesting that every Christian who takes this approach always thinks he or she is one of the REAL Christians. Calvinists do the same. I have never met a Calvinist who didn’t say that he or she was one of the elect. Seems quite self-serving, if you ask me.

About this statement:

“Christians are confused about what salvation is. Of course this is understandable because the Bible teaches many different plans of salvation.”

I don’t quite understand what you mean by the Bible teaches many different plans of salvation. It says clearly that Jesus is the only way to God the Father in John 14:6 “Jesus said to him, ‘I am the way, and the truth, and the life, no one comes to the Father but through Me’”. The Bible also explains in Romans 5:8 that Jesus did (sic) in our place and wiped our sin clean “God demonstrates His own love toward us, in that while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us” It’s beyond me what other kind of “plan of salvation” could be.

Jason is perplexed by my statement that the Bible teaches many plans of salvation. I know that Jason has been “taught” that there is only one plan of salvation, but he might want to read the Good Book again.

In the Old Testament, how were people saved? By keeping the law.

In the New Testament, how were people saved? Paul said by faith. James said by faith and works. In Acts the early church concluded that certain works were required for Gentiles to be saved.

There are thousands of Christian sects. Each sect has its own take on salvation. Is it by faith alone? Is it by faith and works? Is it by baptism for the remission of sins? Must a person speak in tongues as evidence of salvation? Must a person persevere to the end to be saved?

Supposedly, the salvation message is so simple that even a child can understand it. If this is so, why is there so much confusion in Christianity over what is required for a person to be saved? If, as Britta says above, the Holy Spirit gives discernment, why is there so much confusion? Maybe the Holy Spirit needs to be relieved of his duties. Perhaps God should do away with the Bible and put out a Salvation FAQ. In the FAQ God should state very clearly his demands, using as few words as possible. Surely God wants everyone to know the simple gospel message, right? Oh wait, no he doesn’t, since he created some people so he could damn them, and he even makes some people spiritually deaf so they will not hear the gospel. What kind of God says to a deaf man, HEAR?

I understand that you, as a former pastor, may have been faced with many people that fell under the categories listed, but I reassure you that Christians, like myself, who, really in their hearts believe that Jesus is their savior and make that effort to learn more about Him, don’t really fit the description.

Jason wants me to know that he is not like other Christians. He is a sincere Christian®. He is a devoted Christian. He really, really believes in his heart and he makes an effort to know more about Jesus — not like those other “not real” Christians.

I am sure Jason means well. I have no doubt he sincerely believes. That said, my only advice to him is that he needs to read as many books as possible that challenge the version of Christianity he thinks is the “way, truth, and life.” Carefully read the Bible. Forget what you have been taught. What if Paul, Peter, and James really taught three different plans of salvation? What if there really are multiple Gods in the Old Testament? Instead of interpreting everything through a Trinitarian Protestant lens, let the Biblical author and text speak for itself.  When the Bible says “Let US make man in our image” don’t assume US means the Trinitarian Protestant God. Maybe it means multiple Gods. Polytheism can be found all over the Old Testament if readers will take off their Trinitarian blinders.

All Evangelicals thinks that their beliefs are right and that their God is the true God. All other Gods are false Gods. Their plan of salvation is the one that will assure them a room in God’s Heavenly Motel Six, and their interpretation of the Bible is, without a doubt, exactly as God meant it to be. Uncertainty and doubt are the tools of Satan, so through life they plod armed with certainty, assured that their beliefs are superior to all others.  Until they can at least entertain the possibility of being wrong, there is no hope for them.

print

Subscribe to the Daily Post Digest!

Sign up now and receive an email every day containing the new posts for that day.

I agree to have my personal information transfered to MailChimp ( more information )

I will never give away, trade or sell your email address. You can unsubscribe at any time.

Powered by Optin Forms

10 Comments

  1. Geoff

    How many of these ‘real’ Christians have actually stopped to reflect on their beliefs? I’m sure they’d all say that they do, but they never, ever, do. The best they do is some sort of biblical interpretation, but never once do they ask themselves whether there might be any doubts as to the reliability of the bible. Fortunately there now seems to be an unstoppable movement away from religion, at least as regards Christianity, and especially in the US.

    The internet is probably the single biggest threat that religion has ever faced. Admittedly it can run both ways, with all sorts of ridiculous nonsense being circulated, from conspiracy theories to flat earth clubs. However, much more importantly is its capacity to disseminate reason; and how many people who doubted their faith have been greatly helped by this very blog, which shows they aren’t alone? I had no idea until I began reading this blog (led here by the John Loftus anthology ‘Beyond an absence of Faith’), how hard it was for Christians in the US to openly admit to being atheists.

    Now the big threat is from Islam. Up until recently one could sit back and look disdainfully on American fundamdamentalists, on the basis that they harm only themselves. The trouble is that it’s difficult to start convincing Muslim countries that their beliefs are foolish, when they can point to the US and say ‘well it’s alright for them’.

    The fight is on worldwide to try and address so many problems that stem from religion. Religion only ever hinders progress; when we talk about ‘liberal’ Christians we should remember that they’ve had to be dragged there kicking and screaming. Morality only ever moves forward when there’s secular thinking, then when religion eventually concedes the issue it claims the credit, and says ‘you need the bible to be moral’.

    Reply
    1. another ami

      Hi Geoff. I agree with most of what you say but there are two things I would like to address in your comment that I feel are inaccurate, based on my own faith upbringing, that of the Quakers. I point these things out not to defend Christianity, or even Quakerism, but in the simple interest of accuracy.
      You open by asking if any “‘real’ Christians” actually reflect on their beliefs, concluding that they do not because they revert to an infallible Bible for confirmation. Quakers do not have a formal statement of faith. Instead they have a series of questions, the Queries, that people are supposed to ask of themselves, which in my meeting was taught to mean serious and merciless introspection, reflection and meditation. I was never taught that the Bible was infallible. We were all told, in no uncertain terms, that science trumps the Bible in matters of facts, especially regarding science. Where they disagreed, science was right and the Bible was wrong, period. The “science” of the Bible was merely the authors’ attempts to describe things science and reason had yet to explain. And the Bible could not actually be infallible because first, it was written by fallible men and second because of the difficulties of interpretation and translation. I know from my own experiences with the church of my youth that many (most?) in that congregation probably did not dig deep into their beliefs, but some did and those who taught me were from that group.
      I would also point to the Quakers involvement in the Abolitionist activities in pre-civil war America as an example of religion being progressive. Those Quakers were not “dragged there kicking and screaming”; they were leading the charge. Google John Woolman (1720-1772) or Levi Coffin (1798 -1877) for examples. Sadly, most Quakers today have either adopted the fundamentalism/conservatism of the far right or are so quiet as to appear silent, which is why I left the church 30+ years ago.
      I hope no one takes these comments as preaching. Bruce, if I have crossed that line, please edit or delete my comment as desired. I come here to have my own faith challenged, not to preach.

      Reply
      1. Brian

        Thank-you, another ami, for your thoughts regarding the comment about reflection. They bring up my own questions over time regarding the involvement of the ‘church’ is certain social action in the world.
        As an example in my questioning, I have looked at the Salvation Army and the work they do in inner cities. When I was in college, I used to drive cab at night in Toronto (the 70’s was the era) and I would see Army people offering help to street people, hippyish wanderers, you-name-its, throughout the downtown especially. Because I was well aware of their evangelicalism, I had problems simply allowing that they were helping people in pragmatic ways, as well as proselytizing. So my struggle had to do with that fact, that giving bread with one hand while the Bible came in the other. I talked to some Army people during that time and found that some seemed really reflective and deeply compassionate while others were like soldiers doing a job to win a mission for the team.
        This has always been my experience in groups of believers. I know some Quaker people who seem to reflect the best of faith (if that can be a fair term from an ex-preacher’s son) and I treat their belief as simply part of what they choose to wear in life while I dress differently. I do not feel judged by them, nor do they preach to me. Their faith seems almost like a social club I could actually join (being somewhat anti-club altogether!) But I do not want to join anything; I have enough juggling challenges as it is…
        Are some churches progressive? I think so. When a group of people gather and it leads to moderation in discourse rather than offense to decency, then perhaps religion is less toxic. For me though (and I accept this as individual and the result of my own experience and choices) all religion tends to sour over time. I include in that souring the exhortations to extreme, endless self-questioning and digging for a soul or basis acceptable to a God, within which we can rest in faith. No true place like this endures or has endured in my life and the struggle to become acceptable in spirit and faith became for me like an endless nail-chewing, a kind of chewing on myself. More Jesus, less me! The plea of the fundagelical is essentially unbalanced, for me, I mean. I have felt such a love in simple things since walking out of church. I feel like the morning dawn is all mine because I see it and that is all there is, the whole shebang. I feel like I have been honest with myself and said no to chewing away at myself and the simple fact of human imperfection. I feel freed from a prison, quite gloriously lost and found. The preacher says that some are chosen and some are not. I wear the NOT CHOSEN t-shirt with glee.

        Reply
        1. another ami

          Thanks for the response, Brian. And I agree- endless introspection often leads to self-condemnation, which can lead to depression, as it did with me. Attending a fundagelical (great word I am stealing, btw) church during those heady teenage years led to the expected dramatic teary conversion at revival and subsequent baptism. It also convinced me that I was fundamentally a “bad girl”. It took another 30 years, then 3 years of weekly therapy, a divorce, 5 years of meds and the love of an extraordinary person finally to rid myself of it. There are days when I fight it yet. If it takes the rejection of faith completely to stop “chewing away at yourself”, then by all means, eject faith as fast as possible! For me, it only took ejecting “church”.
          I am here in large part because I see fundagelicalism as a poisonous cancer in our political life. I see Trump as a silver-spooned bigoted blowhard who would be a disaster if elected, but the likes of Rubio, Cruz, and Huckabee scare the holy fuck right out of me. They read Atwood’s “A Handmaid’s Tale” as a blueprint, rather than the cautionary she wrote it as. I am a devout believer in the separation of church and state, and the people here are my allies in this regard. Cruz, Rubio, Huckabee, and likely even Trump, would regard me as a heretic, which to some (most?) of them, is as even bigger sin than atheism.
          I’m quite sure I’d enjoy dinner and a glass of wine with anyone here. I wouldn’t want to spend 5 minutes with the likes of Jason, Britta or especially their preachers. I think there was a damned good reason Jesus hung out with the “sinners”, not the “saints”. Salut.

          Reply
      2. Geoff

        Thanks for the comment Ami. I take on board what you say and, thinking about it, I suppose there must be other denominations that fall into a similar bracket to Quakers. I get overly caught up in the types of evangelical Christian Bruce describes, to whom my comments are particularly directed.

        Reply
  2. Lynn123

    I wonder if she thinks she’s the first person to explain all this to you, the first person to pray that God will open your heart, etc?

    Reply
    1. Karen the rock whisperer

      But, but, but… God led her to do it!

      Reply
      1. Lynn123

        lol-yeah, he always seems to lead people to do what they want to do anyway. I’m waiting for him to lead a mega-church preacher to give away all their money.

        Reply
  3. Melly Smuff

    A good antidote is to mock these know-it-alls in front of their peers. Do this immediately after a church service. Remember to pack a gun.

    Reply
    1. Scott

      Go troll elsewhere, your comments are juvenile and useless.

      Scott

      Reply

Leave a Comment

You have to agree to the comment policy.