And [God] delivered just Lot, vexed with the filthy conversation of the wicked: (For that righteous man dwelling among them [Sodom and Gomorrah], in seeing and hearing, vexed his righteous soul from day to day with their unlawful deeds;) (2 Peter 2:7,8)
The story of Lot begins with him traveling with his uncle, Abram, to the land of Canaan. Both Lot and Abram had sizable herds of livestock, and this led to conflict between the two. The contention reached a level that Abram said to his nephew:
. . . Let there be no strife, I pray thee, between me and thee, and between my herdmen and thy herdmen; for we be brethren. Is not the whole land before thee? separate thyself, I pray thee, from me: if thou wilt take the left hand, then I will go to the right; or if thou depart to the right hand, then I will go to the left. (Genesis 13:8,9)
Lot, whom the Bible calls a “righteous” man:
. . . lifted up his eyes, and beheld all the plain of Jordan, that it was well watered every where, before the Lord destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah, even as the garden of the Lord, like the land of Egypt, as thou comest unto Zoar. Then Lot chose him all the plain of Jordan; and Lot journeyed east: and they separated themselves the one from the other. (Genesis 13:10,11)
We see right away that Lot had a covetous eye. When given a choice, Lot chose the well-watered plains near Sodom and Gomorrah. Abram and Lot lived in a patriarchal culture, one where the elder Abram should have taken the best land. Instead, for whatever reason, Abram deferred to Lot, and his nephew took advantage of him.
Lot likely knew about Sodom and Gomorrah’s reputation, yet he chose to “pitch his tent toward Sodom.” Why is that? Lot was married and had several married and unmarried daughters. Why would he willingly move his family to Sodom? Perhaps covetousness caused him to turn a blind eye to what was best for his family. Yet, the Bible calls Lot a “righteous” man.
In Genesis 19, we have a story that reveals a good bit about “righteous” Lot:
And there came two angels to Sodom at even; and Lot sat in the gate of Sodom: and Lot seeing them rose up to meet them; and he bowed himself with his face toward the ground; And he said, Behold now, my lords, turn in, I pray you, into your servant’s house, and tarry all night, and wash your feet, and ye shall rise up early, and go on your ways. And they said, Nay; but we will abide in the street all night. And he pressed upon them greatly; and they turned in unto him, and entered into his house; and he made them a feast, and did bake unleavened bread, and they did eat. But before they lay down, the men of the city, even the men of Sodom, compassed the house round, both old and young, all the people from every quarter: And they called unto Lot, and said unto him, Where are the men which came in to thee this night? bring them out unto us, that we may know them. And Lot went out at the door unto them, and shut the door after him, And said, I pray you, brethren, do not so wickedly. Behold now, I have two daughters which have not known man; let me, I pray you, bring them out unto you, and do ye to them as is good in your eyes: only unto these men do nothing; for therefore came they under the shadow of my roof. And they said, Stand back. And they said again, This one fellow came in to sojourn, and he will needs be a judge: now will we deal worse with thee, than with them. And they pressed sore upon the man, even Lot, and came near to break the door. But the men put forth their hand, and pulled Lot into the house to them, and shut to the door.
By the time two angels arrive in Sodom to see Lot, he had become quite comfortable with his status and place in Sodom. As the angels arrived at the city gate, Lot arose from his seat and welcomed them. Knowing the sexual proclivities of the men of Sodom, Lot encouraged the angels to come to his home and spend the night with him. At first, the angels said they would spend the night on the streets. Lot, knowing what would happen to them if they did, pleaded with the angels to take him up on his offer. Finally, they relented.
Later that night, the younger and older men of the city surrounded Lot’s home and demanded that he give the angels to them so they could have sex with them. Lot said to the crowd, “I pray you, brethren, do not so wickedly.” Okay, good so far, right? Just what you would expect a Jesus-loving “righteous” man to do. However, Lot didn’t stop there. Here’s what he said next:
Behold now, I have two daughters which have not known man; let me, I pray you, bring them out unto you, and do ye to them as is good in your eyes: only unto these men do nothing; for therefore came they under the shadow of my roof. (Genesis 19:8)
Instead of standing his ground against the boys and men at his door, “righteous” Lot attempted to appease them by offering his two virgin daughters to the men. Lot said, “do ye to them as is good in your eyes.” What kind of man and father was Lot? What kind of man offers up his young daughters for sexual gratification? How can Lot be considered a “righteous” man? The men at Lot’s door refused his offer and demanded that he turn over the angels to them. Instead, the angels smote the men with blindness.
In Genesis 19, the Bible tells us that the pro-life God finally had enough with Sodom and Gomorrah and the other cities of the plain, and decided to destroy them — men, women, children, animals, and unborn fetuses. The angels told Lot that it was time for him to gather up his family and leave the city. Lot’s married children refused to leave. The angels grabbed ahold of Lot, his wife, and his two virgin daughters and led them outside of the city. The Lord said to Lot: “Escape for thy life; look not behind thee, neither stay thou in all the plain; escape to the mountain, lest thou be consumed.” (Genesis 19:17)
Righteous Lot didn’t want to leave, so he made a deal with God:
Oh, not so, my Lord: Behold now, thy servant hath found grace in thy sight, and thou hast magnified thy mercy, which thou hast shewed unto me in saving my life; and I cannot escape to the mountain, lest some evil take me, and I die: Behold now, this city is near to flee unto, and it is a little one: Oh, let me escape thither, (is it not a little one?) and my soul shall live. (Genesis 19: 8-20)
Lot and his family fled Sodom and headed for Zoar. God promised that they would be safe in Zoar. Unfortunately, Lot’s wife wasn’t paying attention when the Lord told them not to look behind them as they left. Lot’s wife turned her head to longingly look back at her home, and God smote her dead by turning her into a pillar of salt. In the New Testament, the writer of the gospel of Luke tells readers in 17:32, “Remember Lot’s wife.” Why did the author want readers to remember Lot’s wife? Based on the context found in chapter 17, Lot’s wife was an example of someone who sought to save her life; a person who put self above God.
After “righteous” Lot and his daughters arrived in Zoar, God rained fire and brimstone down on Sodom, Gomorrah, and other cities, killing every living thing. Zoar, “righteous” Lot’s safe haven, was spared punishment, but it was not long before Lot feared for his life and left the city. “Righteous” Lot moved to a mountain cave with his two daughters. One night, “righteous” Lot’s daughters decided that they wanted to have babies, so they got their father drunk and had sex with him. Both of them were ovulating, and both got pregnant the first time they had incestuous sex with “righteous” Lot. (Genesis 19:31-38)
I ask you, dear readers, what in this story says to you that Lot was a “righteous” man? What I see is a covetous man who valued property and place over family; a man who put his family in harm’s way; a man who violated his daughters, impregnating both of them. Does anyone really believe that Lot was so drunk that he didn’t know he was fucking his daughters? If Lot truly was that drunk, it is unlikely he could even have sex. I suspect the author of Genesis wanted to protect “righteous” Lot’s reputation, so, as men have been doing from time immemorial, he put the blame on the women.
A righteous man is moral and just, yet it is evident from the Bible that Lot was anything but. Why, then, does the Apostle Peter call Lot a “righteous” man? Evangelicals explain away Lot’s profane life by saying that Lot was “righteous” because of the righteousness of Jesus, and not anything good that he had done. This same argument is used to defend adulterous, murderous King David, whom the Bible calls a “man after God’s own heart.” (Acts 13:22)
If religious faith does not result in moral and ethical transformation, what good is it? James seemed to understand this when he said that “faith without works is dead.” What were the works James was talking about? In James 2, the Apostle spoke of doing right by the poor and disadvantaged; that doing so was a sign of true faith. Consider these words:
What doth it profit, my brethren, though a man say he hath faith, and have not works? can faith save him? If a brother or sister be naked, and destitute of daily food, And one of you say unto them, Depart in peace, be ye warmed and filled; notwithstanding ye give them not those things which are needful to the body; what doth it profit? Even so faith, if it hath not works, is dead, being alone. Yea, a man may say, Thou hast faith, and I have works: shew me thy faith without thy works, and I will shew thee my faith by my works.
Compare these words to the behavior of Trump-loving Evangelicals. Are these lovers of Jesus righteous? Not according to the Bible. In Matthew 25, Jesus told people what were the marks of being a True Christian®:
- Feeding the hungry
- Giving drink to the thirsty
- Taking in strangers (immigrants?)
- Clothing the naked
- Visiting people in prison
Notice that Jesus said nothing about beliefs. True Christianity® is measured by good works, not doctrinal fidelity. Based on this standard, how many Americans are truly Christians? From my seat in the atheist pew, what I see is a form of Christianity that focuses on right beliefs; that Lot and David are considered “righteous,” not because of their behavior, but because of what they believed. All that matters is having beliefs deemed orthodox. Is this the kind of Christianity Jesus envisioned?
Did you ever hear sermons about Lot? How did your pastors explain the Bible calling Lot a “righteous” man? Please share your thoughts in the comment section.
Bruce Gerencser, 66, lives in rural Northwest Ohio with his wife of 45 years. He and his wife have six grown children and thirteen grandchildren. Bruce pastored Evangelical churches for twenty-five years in Ohio, Texas, and Michigan. Bruce left the ministry in 2005, and in 2008 he left Christianity. Bruce is now a humanist and an atheist.
Connect with me on social media:
Your comments are welcome and appreciated. All first-time comments are moderated. Please read the commenting rules before commenting.
You can email Bruce via the Contact Form.
This story is so obscene that even Mr Tee must surely struggle to defend it (and, yes, I have read ‘explanations’ and they’re pathetic). It boils down to homosexuality being so objectionable that a fable is written in which the moral is ‘look guys, sticking your dangler in another man’s bottom is so yucky that it’s better you offer up your daughters instead so they can be abused’. How about if the daughters say no, just let them have the angels. After all, these marauding hordes presumably already knew the daughters were there for the taking, and only appeared when the male angels arrived!
It’s been decades since I heard sermons about LOT, and about Sodom and Gomorrah. The evangelical preachers I heard tried to explain away the following items:
Lot was righteous because he followed God’s Law in the midst of lawlessness.
Lot only offered his vitlrgin daughters because he KNEW gay men wouldn’t harm them, and by Jewish law he was supposed to put the needs of guests first. So he was still righteous and offering his daughters didn’t actually put them at risk of harm.
Lot’s drunkenness is yet another example why people should NEVER EVER DRINK ALCOHOL. Women needed sons to make sure they’d be taken care of in old age so…..SQUIRREL!
I didn’t fully buy it, especially as a questioning teen…..
Well, the whole Lot thing was always rather depressing and creepy to me,the way people thought and acted back then. I’ve heard preachers talk about Lot because that story involves Sodom and Gomorrah. And they’d use those two hamlets to describe present- day American society. And that if God doesn’t destroy America for it’s collective wickedness, he’ll have to apologize to Sodom and Gomorrah. That was their take on it. I wonder what Lot would think of Los Angeles,lol. And Hollywood, just a few blocks away. There’s so much natural beauty in the area. It’s almost heartbreaking. Dysfunctional families+ narcissist politicians who neglected housing and other needs for decades, is why So Cal is the howling calamity that it is. The Bible doesn’t go into just WHY those two towns had crowds of rapists running around to begin with. What was going on, that you had such behavior among so many individuals ?? Kids had absolutely no rights at that time, anywhere in the Middle East. That HAD to be at the root of everything else that was wrong with that place. Prevention always beats the ” cure.”. I didn’t like that chapter because such things never had to reach that point. And Lot didn’t seem like all that great a person,but he was spared anyway, because he didn’t lead the Sodom lifestyle,and had a relationship with God, apparently. But,what happened to Lot’s married kids and in- laws ? Did they die there in S&G ? I wonder why there’s no account of THEM. Didn’t their lives matter as much as Lot’s ? Evidently not !
The story of Lot was always a puzzle. He did not seem at all righteous. Yet my pastor would point to him as a righteous man.
Growing up, I saw the importance of feeding the hungry. That was the message of the gospels. I understood the message as indicating that I should be personally conservative (set strict standards for myself) but socially liberal (be kind and forgiving to others). In my teenage years, I could not help but notice that many church members were personally liberal but socially conservative.
I can read Paul as saying “faith, not works, lest any man should boast”. And yet I hear lots of boasting about faith. That idea didn’t work out very well.
I left Christianity, because the church did not seem at all Christian.
One of your best commentaries ever. Lot never seemed like a decent man to me, let alone “righteous”. Have you ever heard of Europeans claiming the American interpretation of S&G is “all wrong” anyways? I’ve read several vlogs where they say the King James version twisted the story and that the older European versions of the Bible say the meaning behind S&G story is about it being a sin to rape, and specifically to rape children and that it really has nothing to do with homosexuality. And it was said since King James was written by the Roman Catholics that is why they probably did not want to convey that it was a sin to rape kids so they threw shade on the gays because we know what a problem Catholic priests seem to have with resisting their urges with little boys. I’ve not been able to find a European bible, let alone a Swedish one, to confirm what the vloggers said is true. I think this would be an interesting topic on this vlog if anyone can get ahold of non-American bibles to confirm.
This may sound narcissistic, but re-reading, for the first time in years, about Lot causes me to take pity on my younger self.
Why? When I was an Evangelical Christian (in my early adult life) I tried to buy into the idea that Lot was a righteous man because, essentially, he followed God’s orders. That, as I was trying to pray (and asking others to pray) me into being a heterosexual man.
You might think that the story of Lot (and the Bible generally) doesn’t touch transgenderism. But it, like much of the Bible, it reeks with misogyny, which made me more anxious about fitting myself into the “M” box. And, although I was decades away from talking or writing about being sexually abused by a priest and a male family friend, or from affirming my gender identity, I was repulsed, in a completely visceral way, by Lot impregnating his daughters–essentially because he believed, whether of his own volition or God’s, that it was better than being gay or a woman.
Something occurs to me now: The blue-collar Catholic men around whom I grew up might have known that Lot’s wife was turned to a pillar of salt, but wouldn’t have known why. (I grew up in a time when Catholics were discouraged from reading the Bible for themselves.) Had they known someone like Lot in real life, they would have hated, and possibly even tried to kill, him. For one thing, he is the exact opposite of what they’d’ve called a “stand-up guy.” For another, to them, there is nothing more disgusting than a man who does what Lot did to his daughters.
Anyway…Bruce, this was one of your better posts. And that’s saying something.
Bruce, do you remember my post on Lot etc.? I just looked it up. You commented that it was quite entertaining. 🙂 I checked the date on it. I wrote it near the end of 2008! Your post brought back some rather old memories.
My sense is that the Bible’s definition of “righteousness” is whatever the writer of a particular passage wants it to be. Many modern Christians (Evangelicals and conservative Catholics in particular, but it isn’t limited to them) redefine words like “love” to mean “we have the right to f**k up your life because we think our God says so.”
I am reminded of “righteous” Job, who ought to have taken God aside early on and demanded to know why the hell he was making bar bets with Satan in the first place.
The only obvious answer to all this nonsense is that gods are created by humans. (Well, as far as we know. I suppose other species could have their own conception of deities.)
The children Lot sired with his daughters supposedly founded the Moabite and Ammonite people groups, regional rivals of the Israelites. I suspect this unpleasant anecdote is in large part a political retconning to smear these antagonists of “God’s chosen people”.