Menu Close

Is Joe Biden the Pro-Labor President?

rail workers

By Jake Johnson, Common Dreams

Rank-and-file rail workers voiced frustration and anger late Monday after Joe Biden—a self-described “pro-labor president”—urged Congress to pass legislation forcing unions to accept a contract agreement without any paid sick days, a step that would avert a looming nationwide strike and deliver a win for the profitable railroad industry.

“By forcing workers into an agreement which doesn’t address basic needs like healthcare and sick time, President Joe Biden is choosing railroads over workers and the economy,” said Ross Grooters, an engineer and co-chair of Railroad Workers United, an inter-union alliance that supports public ownership of the national rail system.

Another worker was more blunt in a text message to labor reporter Jonah Furman: “Words cannot express how fucking livid I am at this administration… people in power, LIKE HIM, would rather screw workers than stand up to fucking robber barons.”

While Congress could put forth legislation that would improve the tentative White House-brokered contract deal announced in September, Biden made clear he wants lawmakers “to pass legislation immediately to adopt the tentative agreement between railroad workers and operators—without any modifications or delay—to avert a potentially crippling national rail shutdown.”

That agreement, which has been rejected by more than half of the country’s unionized rail workforce, does not include a single day of paid sick leave and would only allow three penalty-free days off per year for medical visits. But even that time off is heavily constrained: It’s unpaid; can only be taken on a Tuesday, Wednesday, or Thursday; and must be scheduled at least 30 days in advance.

“These agreements were rejected because the quality of life rail workers and their families have today is abysmal,” Ash Anderson, a member of the Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes Division (BMWED)—one of the unions that voted against ratifying the tentative deal—wrote on Facebook. “There were no provisions to improve the quality of life for rail workers, who continue to be exploited by companies that are earning record-breaking profits while their service suffers and they cut their workforce to the bone.”

Anderson continued:

I just want Americans to see the stories of these men and women, the stories of their families. I want Americans to recognize that these workers are being driven out of their chosen profession by the continued harsh conditions, callous discipline, long hours far from home, and basic lack of respect and dignity in the work that President Biden just stated was too important to allow to stop, regardless the cost.

The railroads’ record profit margins are safe, their exorbitant stock buybacks and shareholder returns are secured. Americans will have all the conveniences available this busy shopping season. Rail workers will work sick to make sure it’s all done, because that’s what they have to do.

Shortly following Biden’s statement, outgoing House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) announced her chamber will move this week to take up legislation requiring rail workers to accept the tentative deal and denying them their right to strike. Without a contract deal or congressional action, a strike could begin early next month.

Echoing Biden, Pelosi insisted that lawmakers are “reluctant to bypass the standard ratification process” and declared that “we must recognize that railroads have been selling out to Wall Street to boost their bottom lines, making obscene profits while demanding more and more from railroad workers.”

“But,” the Democratic leader added, “we must act to prevent a catastrophic nationwide rail strike, which would grind our economy to a halt.”

The White House’s intervention answers the call of rail giants and corporate lobbying groups—including the powerful U.S. Chamber of Commerce—that have been pushing for and banking on congressional action as contract talks remain at a standstill, with rail companies refusing to drop their opposition to workers’ basic sick leave demands.

Rail unions had originally pushed for 15 days of paid sick leave, a policy that rail companies estimated would cost around $688 million a year—less than what billionaire Warren Buffett, the CEO of BNSF Railway’s parent company, added to his net worth in a single day last week.

The unions have since moved down to asking for four paid sick days, but rail companies remain opposed even as they rake in huge profits and enrich their executives and shareholders. The Lever reported in September that “the CEOs of five of the largest railroad conglomerates have been paid more than $200 million in the last three years, and company shareholders have been boosted by nearly $200 billion in stock buybacks and dividends over the last dozen years.”

Matthew Weaver, a carpenter with BMWED, told The New York Times that Biden’s decision to step in and force workers to accept a contract agreement opposed by a majority of rail union members “seems to cater to the oligarchs.”

“All of rail labor is going to suffer because of this,” said Weaver.

Grooters of Railroad Workers United argued that Congress “should ignore White House shortsightedness and introduce the labor-friendly version of a railroad bill”—but it’s not yet clear whether progressive lawmakers in the House or Senate will attempt to force amendments to the tentative agreement.

Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), an outspoken supporter of rail workers, told reporters Monday that any legislation preventing a strike must guarantee workers sick leave.

Citing unnamed sources, CNN reported late Monday that “following House passage, Senate action could occur later this week or next.”

“The Senate is expected to have the votes to break a filibuster on the bill to avert a potential railway strike, according to those sources,” the outlet noted. “There are likely to be at least 10 Republicans who will vote with most Senate Democrats to overcome a 60-vote threshold. The only question is how quickly the bill can come to the floor since any senator can object, dragging out the process and delaying a quick vote.”

“Sources are watching Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders closely to see if he upends an effort to get a quick vote,” CNN added. “A Sanders spokesman declined to comment.”

bruce-gerencser-headshot

Bruce Gerencser, 65, lives in rural Northwest Ohio with his wife of 44 years. He and his wife have six grown children and thirteen grandchildren. Bruce pastored Evangelical churches for twenty-five years in Ohio, Texas, and Michigan. Bruce left the ministry in 2005, and in 2008 he left Christianity. Bruce is now a humanist and an atheist.

Connect with me on social media:

You can email Bruce via the Contact Form.

Your comments are welcome and appreciated. All first-time comments are moderated. Please read the commenting rules before commenting.

10 Comments

  1. Avatar
    Ben Berwick

    From the outside looking in, so to speak, both the major US political parties are quite similar, and the Democrats are decidedly not left-wing, however much they might want to see themselves that way. Urging people to accept a deal that doesn’t include sick pay, for the sake of the economy? That sounds like right-wing economics 101. It’s a shame, because MAGAs will play upon this.

    • Avatar
      Bruce Gerencser

      Yep. I laugh when people call Clinton/Biden/Obama leftists. Not even close. Sure, they are to the left of the Republicans, but they are still beholden to their corporate overlords and the military-industrial complex. There are a few leftists in Congress, but nothing like we see in Europe.

      I’m a Bernie Sanders fan. He’s a leftist, a Democratic Socialist. Elizabeth Warren skews left, maybe AOC, but most Democrats are corporate centrists — especially those in leadership positions.

      I hate our two-party system. We are stuck election after election with choosing the lesser of two evils. Is this the best we can do? 😢😢🤬🤬

      • Avatar
        Infidel753

        Latest word is that, under pressure from progressives, Pelosi will hold a second vote on adding a requirement for seven days paid sick leave to the deal. It is expected the get through the House. The Senate will be harder because of the filibuster, but it might be doable. Several Republican senators support adding the sick leave provision.

        The Democrats really need to fight like hell to get this through. There’s never going to be a more defining moment in Biden’s presidency.

  2. Avatar
    ObstacleChick

    I despise the 2 party system and the way both parties benefit from the money from the wealthy. The GOP spin their reliance on wealthy donors by claiming that they support the notion of the little guy working his way up to become a billionaire by pulling himself up by his bootstraps and working hard – which is bullshit. The Democrats claim to support workers and the little guy but are just as likely to throw the workers under the train if it’s expedient.

    I understand that our economy is highly reliant on train transport, but the workers need to be cared for. Period.

  3. Avatar
    MJ Lisbeth

    Joe Biden, like Barack Obama and Bill Clinton (all of whom I voted for), is nothing more or less than a product of his party and the system it supports, and supports it. They all are beholden, in one way or another, to whomever is writing the checks. They are more “pro-labor” than, say, Ronald Reagan–a pretty low bar, indeed–but nothing like the real leftists of Europe and Latin America.

    I like Bernie Sanders and in a better country he would be President. But I admit I voted for Elizabeth Warren in the primary because she seemed like the most left-leaning candidate who had any chance of getting elected. (And, like Bernie, she seems to be basically a decent person.) Plus, being someone who was once a Republican and who claims to be “a capitalist in my bones,” she could offer the most cogent critiques of what does and doesn’t work in this system, and for whom and why.

    Call me a cynic or pessimist, but we are not going to have a “pro-labor” (or even “not anti-labor”) President as long as tech and finance companies, and other wealthy corporations and individuals, are major campaign contributors–whether said donors donate for good p.r. or to be on the good side of whoever wins. (Many, especially in the financial world, make contributions to both parties.)

  4. Avatar
    Troy

    The deal being imposed on the unions (75% of the unions actually approved the deal) is quite generous. I like Bernie Sanders, he is a good advocate, but Bernie Sanders, I should point out, is not a Democrat. Sanders has never run or company or made a payroll. If he had, maybe he could see there are two sides. A strike would actually hurt the very people that are striking. You don’t get paid during the strike. Most people don’t get paid sick days, I certainly don’t. It is better to have personal days anyway. Take a 25% increase in pay, every 4 days you’re getting a full day’s pay. Biden’s hands are a bit tied on this one. A rail strike could take down the entire economy as well. I suppose a Sanders administration would allow this to happen? “Proworker” means nobody works?

    • Avatar
      Infidel753

      Sanders isn’t arguing to let a strike crash the economy. He’s arguing that if Congress is going to impose a deal on the workers, it should include a requirement for paid sick leave, which railway workers do not currently get — a barbaric situation which is a shame to the entire country.

      According to Sanders, the cost of providing seven days paid sick leave per worker would come to $320 million, which is a mere two percent of the railway companies’ profits — of their profits, not even their gross revenues. These filthy, greedy vermin want to deny their workers a benefit which any civilized society would consider the bare minimum, for the sake of two percent of their profits. They should be grateful we’re not breaking out the tumbrels.

Want to Respond to Bruce? Fire Away! If You Are a First Time Commenter, Please Read the Comment Policy Located at the Top of the Page.

Bruce Gerencser