David Malllinak is the pastor of Berean Baptist Church — an Independent Fundamentalist Baptist (IFB) congregation in Ogden, Utah. Several years ago, Mallinak wrote a post titled Why It Stinks to be An Atheist. As is common in such articles written by Evangelical preachers, Mallinak writes about an atheism that does not exist. He claims to have heard all the atheist arguments, yet he dismisses them out of hand.
Mallinak begins by saying:
If, as the atheist claims, all the world is a product of impersonal forces – the collision of matter and energy – or perhaps, lightning striking mud, then what we really have going on is this gigantic chemical reaction which members of the press somberly describe as “breaking news.” Sometimes the chemicals fizz; sometimes they pop; sometimes they experience diaphragm spasms; sometimes they debate. But the chemical activity from one beaker to the next really doesn’t matter because it isn’t really anything anyway. Some brains spark rationally, and some quite irrationally, and that is what chemicals do given certain temperatures and atmospheric pressures.
Atheism is the absence of belief in the existence of gods. That’s it. Any other belief added to this statement is beyond the scope of atheism proper. While most atheists accept evolution as the best explanation for our biological world and accept scientific consensus for the age of the earth and the universe, not all atheists do. Many atheists are indifferent about matters of science. I, for one, have little interest in discussions about the beginning of the universe. I am far more concerned about the here and now than what took place billions of years ago,
Mallinak would have us believe, based on his ignorant understanding of human minds, that atheists believe rationality and irrationality are based solely on chemical processes. While the brain sending and receiving chemical/electrical signals throughout our bodies controls all sorts of physical processes, including thinking, we must not ignore how external influences, education, experiences, and traumas affect our thinking too. Rationality and irrationality are affected by both nature and nurture.
Mallinak goes on to say that because atheists believe in a world of impersonal causes our lives lack wit, will, wisdom, personality, design, intention, or purpose:
Ideas have consequences. The atheist imagines a world without God – a world of impersonal causes. In the ultimate order of things, there can be no wit, no will, no wisdom, no personality, no design, no intention, no purpose. Thus, Christian apologists have pointed out that nihilism is the only consistent atheism.
While this may be true on a cosmic level, it is certainly not true as we live our day-to-day lives as godless heathens. Sure, some atheists are nihilists, but most are not. The reason for this, of course, is that most atheists are humanists. It is secular humanism that provides many atheists with an ethical and moral foundation by which to live their lives. (Mallinak writes as if he’s never heard of secular humanism.) Humanism gives them meaning, purpose, and direction. Want to call humanism a religion? Fine, I don’t care. To suggest that atheists don’t have wit, will, wisdom, personality, design, intention, or purpose is absurd, nothing more than an attempt to paint atheists in a bad light. Humanism provides a comprehensive challenge to Mallinek’s Fundamentalist worldview. And the good news for humanists is that we are free to draw from all sorts of worldviews as we build a moral and ethical framework for our lives, including Christianity. I have no problem admitting that my worldview is deeply affected by the fifty years I spent in Christianity — for good or ill. I embrace the good things I learned from Christianity while rejecting those beliefs and teachings that cause harm. I view the Bible as a book of wisdom and spiritual teachings, just as I do other religious texts.
Mallinak believes that atheists live in denial of the logical conclusions of their beliefs; those beliefs, of course, as defined by a right-wing preacher:
If we could get our atheist friends to be honest with their own worldview and to follow their premises to their logical conclusions, this is what we would get. And that’s why it stinks to be an atheist. Because once in a while, as someone else has pointed out, the atheist looks around him at all the beauty and all the splendor and all the delights of this world, and feels a strange and alien sensation creep into his heart that for a moment makes him want to contradict his own premises and feel what the Christians describe as “gratitude.” But in that moment of insanity, he stumbles over two roadblocks. First, his atheism leaves him with no way of accounting for the sensation of gratitude, aside from an exalted notion that his feelings are actually things and that they mean something. How irrational in a world of impersonal cause! And then, if those irrational sensations persist, he looks around for someone to thank and finds nobody.
Mallinak lives in a religious bubble that requires a God for goodness to exist; for beauty to exist; and for gratitude to exist. Lacking imagination, Mallinak cannot fathom a world without his peculiar version of God, one shaped by his idiosyncratic interpretations of the sixty-six books of the King James Bible. Mallinak alleges that he has talked to atheists; that he has atheist friends. I question how many intimate atheist friends he might have. IFB preachers have little room in their lives for people who disagree with them; especially people who consider their beliefs and practices harmful, both psychologically and physically.
I have been an outspoken atheist for almost seventeen years. I have answered allegations such as Mallinak’s many times. On the About page for this site you will find the following advice I give to readers:
You have one life. There is no heaven or hell. There is no afterlife. You have one life, it’s yours, and what you do with it is what matters most. Love and forgive those who matter to you and ignore those who add nothing to your life. Life is too short to spend time trying to make nice with those who will never make nice with you. Determine who are the people in your life that matter and give your time and devotion to them. Live each and every day to its fullest. You never know when death might come calling. Don’t waste time trying to be a jack of all trades, master of none. Find one or two things you like to do and do them well. Too many people spend way too much time doing things they will never be good at.
Here’s the conclusion of the matter. It’s your life and you best get to living it. Someday, sooner than you think, it will be over. Don’t let your dying days be ones of regret over what might have been.
I try to live by these principles every day. As far as gratitude is concerned, I give thanks/praise/credit to those to whom it is due. When my partner of forty-six years cooks an awesome meal, I don’t praise a dead Jew who lies buried somewhere outside of Jerusalem. I praise the person who prepared, cooked, and served the meal. When someone does something for me, I thank them. I focus my gratitude on those who matter, and not a deity who is nowhere to be found. And wonder? I am filled with wonder everytime I see my six children and their partners, and my sixteen grandchildren. What a blessing to have a wonderful family. I have a sense of wonder when I watch our four cats run and play with nary a thought of what is happening outside. We are blessed to have lots of wildlife frequent our yard; birds, squirrels, possums, raccoons, skunks, and deer. We also have numerous feral/stray cats that come to our home for food, water, and housing. I marvel at their abilities to survive both the cruelty of their former owners, but also nature itself. Finally, when I look at the night sky I am filled with wonder, grateful that I have been given this moment in time by my ancestors to experience life to its fullest. Yes, I live with a plethora of health problems and battle unrelenting, pervasive pain every waking moment of my life, but on balance, I am grateful to be alive.
Mallinak will reject the locus of my gratitude, but that’s his problem, not mine. He needs a God, a church, and a Bible for his life to have meaning. Having been indoctrinated and conditioned to have a Christ/God-centric life, he likely cannot fathom how an atheist can have a happy, satisfying life.
Mallinak writes:
I would rather worship the Triune God in all His glory and majesty and infinite, loving power and goodness, even if He was make-believe. Yes, I prefer an imaginary God to “the unyielding despair” required by the premises of atheism.
…
But of course, the Triune God is no more make-believe than the sun in the sky. Man could not invent such a God any more than a man could invent himself. If the Triune God Who has revealed Himself in Scripture doesn’t exist, then we cannot explain the world we live in. Morality goes away. Beauty is meaningless. Reason dies. All is meaningless, purposeless. It stinks to be an atheist.
Mallinak would rather believe in a mythical God than accept the world as it is. His ignorant view of atheism has allowed him to construct an atheist straw man, one which he burns to the ground, all the while surrounded by atheists who wonder what the crazy preacher is burning. Much like the deity he worships, Mallinak is torching a myth, Instead of allowing atheists to define themselves, Mallinak insists that he knows non-believers better than they know themselves. How could it be otherwise? He believes God, in the person of the Holy Spirit, lives inside of him, teaching and guiding him through life. He believes this same Spirit talks to him, both personally and through the pages of the Bible. He is certain that his interpretations of the Bible are right, and that his understanding of the Scriptures perfectly aligns with the mind of God. This kind of thinking breeds certainty and arrogance, so it is not surprising that Mallinak thinks he knows how atheists think and what they believe. (Yet, I suspect it upsets him when atheists ignorantly pontificate on what Christians believe without knowildedge and understanding of the religions and its teachings>)
Mallinak concludes his screed with his version of Pascal’s Wager:
Let me invite you to a thought experiment for a moment. Think of this as a spin on Paschal’s wager. If atheism is right, it doesn’t matter whether I believe in God or not. We all die like dogs, and then the skin worms get down to business. But if Christianity is right, we can make sense of the world. If God created the world, then that explains everything – reason, morality, goodness, truth, ice cream flavors, heat and cold, dreams and ideals and disappointments and satisfaction – it all makes sense. If God made the world, then we can justify our innate desires for the good of humanity.
Sigh, right? (Please see Why I Use the Word “Sigh.”) Mallinak’s wager is built upon the foundation of a false definition of atheism and a lack of understanding the humanistic principles by which most atheists live their lives. No matter how much Mallinak protests, atheists and humanists can explain “reason, morality, goodness, truth, ice cream flavors, heat and cold, dreams and ideals and disappointments and satisfaction.” It all makes sense to atheists, without deities and religion getting in the way.
Life is good. May Loki be praised! 🙂
Bruce Gerencser, 67, lives in rural Northwest Ohio with his wife of 46 years. He and his wife have six grown children and sixteen grandchildren. Bruce pastored Evangelical churches for twenty-five years in Ohio, Texas, and Michigan. Bruce left the ministry in 2005, and in 2008 he left Christianity. Bruce is now a humanist and an atheist.
Your comments are welcome and appreciated. All first-time comments are moderated. Please read the commenting rules before commenting.
You can email Bruce via the Contact Form.
The thing I’ve never understood in the arguments contrasting atheism with god belief is what exactly it is about god that somehow bestows these human experiences that range from morality to tasting ice cream to enjoying music. Does god somehow implant receptors in our minds that couldn’t just have emerged as we evolved? I’m guessing that an independent person asked to assess an atheist against this pastor without any previous knowledge of either would find little difference between them, other than what one might expect. They both like chocolate. One likes pizza, the other curry. One enjoys classical music, the other prefers pop. Both have families that they help, and do the usual things. One washes his car come Sunday morning, the other attends church. In short, this pastor has never once exchanged meaningful conversation with an atheist.
GEOFFT, great reply! I agree and have experienced this. People are people. We all have similar priorities. I chuckled a little thinking about music preferences. Even when I was a Christian I thought Christian music sucked! I listened to it because I was “supposed to”, but it was hard to find decent stuff. My wife is still a very devout Christian and she thinks it sucks. LOL
As an atheist I’m often grateful FOR things – for being alive, for the love I feel, for the simple pleasures in life – without necessarily having to be grateful TO someone for them.
I like that one Neil and I’ll keep it for future reference. Grateful for as opposed to grateful to. Nice one.
I agree. I call that living in the moment. I’ve had countless such moments as a photographer; moments when I experienced great joy snapping that moment in time. No one to thank except maybe the lighting, equipment, and my expertise. 🤣❤️
I’m an atheist, and I don’t live in “unyielding despair”. In fact, I’m MORE in awe of the earth and what I can observe of our universe without a deity than I ever was thinking that a deity was involved.
I’ve had the privilege to be able to travel and hope to be able to see more. There’s so much beauty on this earth. In some places, I can FEEL how insignificant and small I am in the presence of such beauty. It’s even more impressive that all this occurred through natural processes.
Also, I resent the notion that we can’t have wit or morals or whatever he was going on about without a deity. The arrogance of certain Christians is annoying. Their arrogance is that THEY chose to follow their deity which bestowed superior intelligence, knowledge, morals, etc, onto the followers of the deity and everyone else is lacking and inferior – worse, that everyone else is filthy, disgusting, and deserving of eyernal torture in hell.
Yes! I feel you. I enjoy and appreciate the world more, now. Also, I am definitely in a better place mentally and emotionally than I was as a Christian. There was so much fear in religion! My wife is still a very devout Christian and is often very much in fear. Fear of not telling enough people about Jesus, or some bad thing that a pastor prophesied about happening, or not praying enough, etc. It’s exhausting! I’m sure that my religious beliefs were a huge factor in a years long depression that I had to fight through when I was still a believer. I am much happier and healthier now as a non-believer.
I lived in fear as well John. It would be years later when I would understand it all but I literally thought it was like OCD. An obsession to pray without ceasing. To always be ready to give an answer for the hope within. The unbearable agony of one soul burning in hell for eternity. I had a trauma history that I would later relate too and see how easy it was to slip from that trauma into another trauma that promised relief from the former trauma without realizing it was simply another traumatic fit. That might not make sense. 🙂
Anymore, I like to comment, pretty much ad nauseum now, that realistically, Mallinak like so many of his brothers and sisters, probably doesn’t realize his encounters with non-theists/atheists and secular humanists. His barber, a doctor, a hospice nurse, a neighbour, a teacher, a baker and the candle-stick maker. All of us living out our lives and our deaths adjacent to one another. Does he stop prior to the paramedic about to give him CPR and check in to see if the medic is a believer in his Triune God? Before his enema prep prior to his colonoscopy does he check in with the nurse who is an atheist? Before the embalmer embalms him does he make sure they are born-again? Does he check out the Christian credentials of the anesthesiologist before they put him under?
Well said, Zoe. My son was in ICU for about 5 days recently. When he was first admitted, due to severe hallucinations, he was considered a flight risk so we had sitters who would do just that, sit with us 24/7. One was a trans person. My wife is still a Christian and had issues with this at first. They turned out to be our favorite person who sat in the room with us. A wonderful human being. My wife is still confused at how that could be, and I love that! 🙂 To your point, no, she did not ask any of the medical staff what their religious beliefs were. I’m sure most were Christians but probably not 100% of them. Yet they all provided the highest level of care that he could have gotten.
Sorry to hear about your son John. Hugs
Yeah +1. I hope he’s got stuff back together.
Sometimes I try to remember what I thought of atheists when I was a Christian. That is starting to seem like a lifetime ago. I seem to remember preachers talking about how foolish atheists were, and probably how immoral and unhappy they were. But I don’t remember having specific ideas about how I thought atheists were. Growing up in Tulsa, OK, I didn’t meet many people who claimed to be atheist. But when I did, I do remember being confused when I met an atheist (or possibly a backslidden Christian) who was happy, kind, creative, fun to be around, non-judgmental, etc. How could this be?!?! Especially when I knew so many Christians who were depressed, anxious, scared, judgmental, etc. I do remember a couple people wondering the same and they just said things like, the devil doesn’t bother/attack non-believers and back sliders. Sigh and ugh! Today, some of the overall happiest Christians I know are the ones who no longer take it so seriously. Interesting.
I was recently reading an old post of Captain Cassidy’s over at Roll to Disbelieve, (titled: Authoritarians, THE ANGLE, and Evangelism Apps, for those interested), and in this post she discusses The Seduction of the Machine (much better than I try to now). The idea being that authoritorian follower types love/need the idea of a machine taking complicated data and breaking it down into something understandable.
As Cassidy puts it “It’s like a Rosetta Stone for life–and I’ve heard Christian leaders with my own two ears making that exact comparison with the Bible. Once believers have it, everything else falls into place (at least in theory). It’s that trust that produces the either/or, black/white, this/that mentality that truly marks the authoritarian mindset. Their trust soothes their many, wild, overwhelming fears. The machine, THE ANGLE, makes everything so easy for those who believe in its power.”
I think that right there is why those of us not of an authoritorian follower mindset can never truly understand them, and vice-versa. To them, the thrilling relief of everything ‘falling into place’ is their ‘conversion experience’. Just follow the rules and right will always be right and wrong wrong.
Which is why they literally cannot understand how we can be happy navigating life without this ‘machine’ telling us how to live. Because for them: “To lose faith in the machine, to question THE ANGLE, brings their fears roiling back to the surface.” Without that black and white framework they flail. And thus they imagine without it we also can only be miserable, scared, lost, etc; but in reality it’s just how they’re wired.
The bigger problem, of course, is that they simply can’t imagine other people might inhabit different mindscapes – hence the endless arrogant pushing from the Christian addict insisting we get hooked on the same drug they are – never mind how often it leads them to misery. What they don’t understand because they truly can’t, is we don’t need the machine. We’re okay with not knowing everything. And what happens after we die is unknowable (though very likely nothing, much like before we were born), meaning the best approach to living is to treat this life as the only one we get.
“there can be no wit, no will, no wisdom, no personality, no design, no intention, no purpose”.
Why did Pastor Dave stop there? He could have continued with “and atheists can be as nasty and vituperative and petty and mean and mendacious and perverted as us Christians”.
It amazes me how he can say Christianity brings reason without a shred of irony.