Menu Close

Ohio’s Regressive Tax Code Code Continues to Punish Poor Ohioans

class warfare

By Marty Schladen, Ohio Capital Journal, Used with Permission

When the United States adopted an income tax in 1913, a major purpose was to make the system progressive and ease growing inequality. More than a century on, Ohio’s system of taxation is having the opposite effect — it’s taxing poor residents much more heavily than the rich and driving further inequality, according to a report released this month.

In fact, Ohio has the 15th-most unequal system of taxation, according to the Institute for Taxation and Economic Policy’s 7th annual analysis, “Who Pays?” 

The Buckeye State also has the dubious distinction of having the 12th-highest state and local tax rate — 12.7% — for the poorest 20% of households, the report said. That was more than double the rate — 6.3% — paid by the 1% of households with the highest incomes in Ohio. Additionally, the poorest 80% of households paid at least 10% in state and local taxes, which means the bulk of Ohioans face significantly heavier burdens than their richest neighbors.

Ohioans are hardly alone. The Institute for Taxation and Economic Policy report said that in 41 states, the highest 1% are taxed at lower rates than everyone else and that 34 — including Ohio — tax the bottom 20% at a higher rate than any other income group.

Not only do low and middle-income households pay more of state and local taxes as a share of their own income, nationally they also pay more in terms of their share of their states’ overall incomes, the report said.

“In other words, not only do the rich, on average, pay a lower effective state and local tax rate than lower-income people, they also collectively contribute a smaller share of state and local taxes than their share of all income,” it said. “This limits states’ ability to raise revenue, particularly as inequality increases. Research shows that when income growth concentrates among the wealthy,  state revenues grow more slowly, especially in states that rely more heavily on taxes that disproportionately fall on low and middle-income households.”

Poverty and inequality are serious problems in Ohio. For example, Medicaid, the state/federal health program for the poor, serves almost a third of Ohioans.

Many also lack the most basic necessities. 

The U.S. Census Bureau’s Household Pulse Survey in October estimated that 357,000 Ohioans often or sometimes didn’t have all the food they need. It also estimated that members of 62,000 households who rent thought it was very or somewhat likely they would be evicted in the next two months. 

Even so, they’re being asked to shoulder more of the burden for state and local government than the richest Ohioans.

The Institute for Taxation and Economic Policy report looked at all state and local taxes people pay, including those on income and property and user fees such as sales and gasoline taxes. Since user fees are the same regardless of income, the less you earn the more of a percentage they take up of your income.

Many economists say relying too heavily on such taxes serves to make the poor poorer.

The federal income tax was proposed as a way of raising revenue — and to address growing inequality. President William Howard Taft, an Ohio Republican, in 1909 proposed a constitutional amendment allowing for it. The amendment was ratified in 1913, and in the debate leading up to ratification many representing agrarian interests said making things more equal was the entire point.

​​“The purpose of this tax is nothing more than to levy a tribute upon that surplus wealth which requires extra expense, and in doing so, it is nothing more than meting out even-handed justice,” said Rep. William H. “Alfalfa Bill” Murray, D-Okla.

At the height of the push, Ohio voters in 1912 gave their OK for a state income tax by a 52-48 margin. But it wasn’t until 1971 that the General Assembly adopted it, and opponents have been chipping away and doing other things to reduce the burden on the wealthy ever since.

For example, a tax break benefitting people who can run their income through a limited liability company is costing the state $1 billion a year, despite doing little to fulfill promises to juice the Ohio economy.

In addition, the budget passed by the legislature and signed into law last year reduced the top tax rate in Ohio from 3.99% to 3.75% and then will consolidate the top two brackets and reduce them to 3.5%.

The moves seem likely to make worse what the Institute for Taxation and Economic Policy found in its analysis.

“Forty-four states’ tax systems exacerbate income inequality,” it said. “When the lowest-income households pay the greatest proportion of their income in state and local taxes, gaps between the most affluent and everyone else grow larger.”

Bruce Gerencser, 67, lives in rural Northwest Ohio with his wife of 46 years. He and his wife have six grown children and thirteen grandchildren. Bruce pastored Evangelical churches for twenty-five years in Ohio, Texas, and Michigan. Bruce left the ministry in 2005, and in 2008 he left Christianity. Bruce is now a humanist and an atheist.

Connect with me on social media:

Your comments are welcome and appreciated. All first-time comments are moderated. Please read the commenting rules before commenting.

You can email Bruce via the Contact Form.

4 Comments

  1. Avatar
    TheDutchGuy

    It’s called trickle up economics. The beauty of having a lot of money is the rich can spread it around to influence politicians to reduce your taxes and shift the tax burden to the poor. The result is the rich have even more money to spread around. You got to spend money to keep your money. If poor people want tax fairness, they just need to contribute more to politicians and Supreme Court Justices.

  2. Avatar
    ObstacleChick

    TheDutchGuy summed it up well.

    A greater social safety net would help so many people be healthier and more able to work. It would help more talented students get the educations they need to become more productive workers. Instead, wealthy people see workers as expendable churn…..

  3. Avatar
    Barbara L. Jackson

    In Colorado we have what I call the Aspen system. (Aspen is a very wealthy ski town). Out of state people want to live in Colorado so the real estate prices go up. Some ski towns are going back to company owned dormitories for employees. We could not afford our house if we were 27 years old now. However now that we are 64 years old we must pay real estate tax on our house which is 10 times the price at purchase. By the way, economics cannot be viewed by itself. It must be viewed by how it influences the society it is in. Human society also exists in the physical universe and things like global warming happen when people think they can ignore the physical universe.

  4. Avatar
    Yulya Sevelova

    America is basically on the ropes,and the rest of the world knows it too, especially foes like Russia,China, all the usual suspects. Taiwan just had their election results, the man is not a member of the Kuomintang, which is pro- China. I’m happy for them in one sense, but now aware that China is poised for war,and on the Eurasian continent, most leaders follow the traditional Zodiac, and it’s the Year of the Dragon, a war year. Russia also does. This goes pretty far back. I’m out of practice, I did it in my youth- pre- Christian. The news about Ohio is very sad, though at least the woman who had the miscarriage, Brittany isn’t going to jail after all. It’s strange that our laws are lining up with South American Catholic government policies. Miscarriage is a crime down there,too. The Red states are laboratories for illogical laws, to see if people will submit. No one is challenging these unfair tax laws boosting the wealthy. People should begin petitions, and try to start something, if time and money permits. We have this horrible train project that no one wants, called the ” Boondoggle.” Billions in the red,even before one strip of track is laid down ! We have a huge deficit,too. Dumping the Boondoggle would help a lot ! Gavin Newsom, like Biden, is a “New Democrat” who is out of touch with average Californians. Just like Jerry Brown Jr., servant of the Vatican. They ignore average fellow Democrats. Disabled people, homeless people, and Indeginous people are ignored. Oh, and Newsom won’t bar Orangeina from the ballot like Maine and Colorado did !!

Want to Respond to Bruce? Fire Away! If You Are a First Time Commenter, Please Read the Comment Policy Located at the Top of the Page.

Discover more from The Life and Times of Bruce Gerencser

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading