Last January, noted Scottish pastor Ian Campbell committed suicide by hanging himself after being admitted to the hospital for a drug overdose. Campbell, a member of the Free Church of Scotland — a Calvinistic sect — pastored Point Free Church in Point, Isle of Lewis. According to the Point Free website, Campbell:
contributes to the e-zine of the Alliance of Confessing Evangelicals, Reformation21, and is a frequent contributor to Ligonier ministry’s Tabletalk magazine. He is a weekly columnist for the local paper, the Stornoway Gazette.
Now that her husband’s body is lying cold in the grave, Campbell’s wife has publicly stated that her pastor husband had sexual affairs with seven church women. In a March 5, 2017 Daily Mail article, Neil Sears had this to say about Campbell’s alleged affairs:
When a leading church minister died in unexplained circumstances on the Isle of Lewis, the close-knit community was in shock.
Tributes to Reverend Dr Iain D Campbell, 53, came from around the world, while shops on the island closed for his funeral in January.
But it has emerged the father-of-three hanged himself after his 54-year-old wife Anne accused him of having up to seven affairs with churchgoers at the same time.
And now she has called on their church to kick out the women for adultery – even hiring herself a public relations professional.
The Free Church of Scotland, often referred to as the ‘Wee Frees’, is investigating while the accused women are understood to be instructing lawyers to help declare their innocence.
Dr Campbell was a leading light in the church – which has strict teachings on the sanctity of marriage and ethics of suicide – in Stornoway.
The minister had been a senior official in the Free Church and minister of the Point Free Church in Lewis, which is off the Scottish mainland’s north-west coast.
….
A source said: ‘It is said Anne was suspicious about Iain’s activities, and confronted him at the manse [a Scottish vicarage] allegedly after finding compromising emails in his computer trash files.
….
‘Anne is wanting all this to go in front of a church court and for them to throw them out of the church for adultery.
‘It will cause havoc with their marriages and the entire Free Church.
‘Even though she’s a widow people are saying Iain had a difficult home life and there’s a lot of anger towards her.’
A source close to senior church figures said: ‘There was never a whisper of a rumour about affairs until after he died – on such a close-knit island they would have been very difficult to keep secret.
‘Yet Anne has supplied names of these alleged mistresses to the church. If she is right, he had been leading an extraordinary double life for years.
‘This is a widow talking about her own late husband.
‘It’s now in the hands of senior Free Church ministers on the island – James Maciver, who conducted the funeral, and Callum Macleod.
‘This is a terrible human tragedy it is difficult to resolve.
‘A dead man can’t be disciplined and can’t defend himself.
‘Suicide is wicked, but it is possible he feared he was about to be ruined. I am hearing there is real evidence to back up these extraordinary claims.
‘But the greater fault would be with Dr Campbell who, as a minister, had a duty of care.’
They said that, if the women admitted affairs, they may be allowed to continue receiving communion. But the source added: ‘It would never be forgotten on the island.’
The women accused of affairs or their families refused to comment or made denials.
In an obituary for Dr Campbell, long-serving Free Church minister Professor Donald Macleod had written: ‘Too late, we know that he was in pain, and sometimes pain is more powerful than faith, and more powerful than reason, and altogether too much for the balance of our minds.’
….
A spokesman for the Free Church on Lewis confirmed the allegations had been made, saying the church was ‘taking these very seriously and acting on them’.
Last night a public relations professional hired by learning support assistant Mrs Campbell made no attempt to deny any details of the story, but said: ‘The family has lost a husband and father.’
According to the Scotland Herald, Campbell not only committed adultery, he also fathered a child with a woman who is not his wife. The Herald also alleges that these allegations could reach as far back as the 1990s.
There are no winners in this story. If reports are true, Campbell was living a double life, one that his wife had knowledge of before he died. While it is likely that his suicide was related to the threat of being exposed as an adulterer, we will never know for sure, because Campbell didn’t leave a note. It’s clear that Campbell’s wife Anne is hurt and angry and she is taking it out on the women who had sexual relationships with her husband. Anne Campbell’s allegation are sure to cause great havoc and damage, both in and outside of the Point Free Church. Worse, the Campbell’s adult children must not only mourn the death of their father, but also deal the fallout from their mother’s allegations.
Campbell’s duplicitous life and suicide are a real conundrum for Evangelical Calvinists on both sides of the pond. Ministerial colleagues, parishioners, and friends all praised Campbell for his devotion to Christ during his fifty-three years on earth. Campbell wrote numerous books, along with articles for Calvinistic publications. He was loved and well-respected. Now that it is known that Campbell committed suicide, and according to his wife he was screwing his way through the female church membership, I wonder what lengths Calvinists will go to square what he said with how he actually lived and ended his life.
Calvinists believe that Christians must persevere to the end to be saved. Despite all of their talk about grace, Calvinists preach a conditional salvation that requires those who say they are Christians to live lives of good works until death. Those who don’t persevere until the end — people such as myself — never were true Christians. (Actually, since I am still among the living, it is p-o-s-s-i-b-l-e that I could return to the faith, that is IF I am one of the elect.) I wonder how Calvinists will square Campbell’s ‘works’ with their theology and the clear teachings of the Bible. Consider:
- By committing suicide and adultery and not repenting, Campbell died having unconfessed sin.
- According to the Bible, people who commit suicide — self-murder — go to hell. (1 John 3:15, Revelation 21:8, Revelation 22:15, John 8:44)
- According to the Bible, people who commit adultery go to hell. (Galatians 5:19-21, James 4:4)
- Campbell broke two of the Ten Commandments
There is nothing ambiguous about Galatians 5:19-21:
Now the works of the flesh are manifest, which are these; Adultery, fornication, uncleanness, lasciviousness, Idolatry, witchcraft, hatred, variance, emulations, wrath, strife, seditions, heresies, Envyings, murders, drunkenness, revellings, and such like: of the which I tell you before, as I have also told you in time past, that they which do such things shall not inherit the kingdom of God.
or 1 Corinthians 6:9,10:
Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind, Nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners, shall inherit the kingdom of God.
It is with stories such as this one that the Calvinistic rubber meets the road. Campbell and his fellow Evangelical preachers — in Puritan-like fashion — view themselves as proclaimers of God’s standard of morality. Asked if homosexuals or same-sex married couples are Christian and will go to heaven when they die, I am sure that, to the man Campbell and his Calvinistic brethren would say no. Will they say the same about Campbell, a self-murderer and adulterer?
We Love Stornoway published (link no longer active) the following obituary for Campbell:
The tragic death of the Reverend Iain D. Campbell has cast a gloom over the island of Lewis such as it has never known in my lifetime; and the gloom is not confined to Lewis. Iain was a well-known figure in Evangelical circles throughout Britain, and beyond, and tributes have already come in from the USA and elsewhere.
‘He could have adorned pulpits in the largest cities in the world,’ writes Dr. Geoff Thomas of Aberystwyth, ‘or become a professor in an American seminary, but he valued the community which nourished and nurtured him, and he shared their values.’ To that community he dedicated his life, and from it he drew the strength that supported his wider ministry.
….
Iain D. Campbell was a brilliant communicator, in constant demand as a lecturer and conference-speaker. He had a quite extraordinary fluency of speech, but the fluency was disciplined by clarity, precision and careful arrangement. The delivery was effortless, though often passionate, the mastery of the subject complete, and while there was no trace of arrogance he spoke with the Bible-derived authority of a true preacher.
But he was also a master of the written word, as his many publications show, and the Free Church recognised this by appointing him Editor of its magazine, the Record, not only once, but twice. He was still serving in this capacity at the time of his death, and one of the most poignant memories we shall carry is that his very last issue (the February one) contains a photo of him in the prime of a splendid manhood, looking perfectly at peace with himself and the world. His editorship avoided controversy, but it reflected faithfully both the growing diversity within the Church and its links with the wider Christian world; and his own contributions consistently dealt with the profoundest themes at a level which was well within the compass of an intelligent laity.
Iain D was a rare combination: an academic and a natural preacher, and all who knew him assumed that sooner rather than later he would be appointed to teach at the Free Church College. Such opportunities did indeed arise and I, for one, devoutly wished to see him as either a colleague or a successor. My attempts to persuade him failed, to my chagrin, and now to my lasting regret, but the College’s loss was Point’s gain. He was inducted there on 21st August 2009, and as in his previous charges of Snizort (1988-95) and Back (1995-2009) his preaching quickly rekindled enthusiasm for the Christian message, and people who had lost their spiritual appetite found themselves once again looking forward eagerly to their Sundays and to preaching which fed their minds and stirred their souls. Thanks to the marvels of modern technology these sermons were heard all over the world and within hours of his death an American pastor was writing, ‘I never met or heard Dr Campbell in the flesh, but I knew him from sermon audios, and the sermons I heard told me all that I needed to know of the man. The reason for his high reputation was obvious. He was a man of transparent piety, for whom the Bible and the God of the Bible was a Being with whom he was familiar. The Bible irradiated everything he said, and every application he made of Biblical truth seemed so searching and personal, even though he did not know those whom he addressed. He knew men’s deepest needs and he addressed them with gentleness and compassion as one who felt for them, and wanted them to have the comfort of Christian peace. His death is a loss, not only to his immediate family and to the congregations he pastored, but to the wider church across the world.’
….
Iain D would have risen to eminence in any profession (and once toyed with the idea of becoming an SNP candidate for the Scottish Parliament), but he chose the Christian ministry, and in that chosen field he became a giant. Yet, for all the consummate ease with which he presented himself in public, he was a very private man who seldom shared his feelings, and he exuded such an aura of calm competence that none of us thought to ask, ‘Are you OK?’ Now, too late, we know that he was in pain, and sometimes pain is more powerful than faith, and more powerful than reason, and altogether too much for the balance of our minds. Bereft of him, we are traumatised, our hearts bleeding, our minds stunned and our prayers turned into protests.
I find myself swirling in a vortex of questions, narratives, disinformation, regrets and fears. St. Paul assures me that ‘God works all things together for good,’ but never has my faith in that great promise been so severely tested. How He can turn this grievous loss into good, I see not. But grace shone brightly in the life of Iain D. Campbell, such grace does not let go, and if it leads me home we shall soon be with the Lord together.
The obituary stated that Campbell was “a man of transparent piety.” Evidently, not. The obituary also said Campbell “knew men’s deepest needs.” To that, all I can say is, indeed.
While men such as David Robertson have attempted to cut off public discussion of Campbell’s immorality, this story remains a hot topic in some Calvinistic circles. From my perspective as a former Evangelical Calvinist and a pastor, this story is a reminder that preachers can and do have secret lives. (The same could be said for all of us.) It seems clear, at least to me, that Ian and Anne Campbell’s marriage was troubled and that Ian found love in all the wrong places. As mentioned numerous times in the Black Collar Crime series and other posts, Evangelical pastors, evangelists, missionaries, elders, deacons, and Sunday School teachers — supposedly pillars or morality and virtue — can be every bit as “worldly” and “sinful” as the unwashed, uncircumcised Philistines of the world.
These men of God preach thundering sermons about the sins of Adam’s race, call on all men everywhere to repent and believe the gospel, yet they themselves cannot live according to what they preach. Campbell leaves a legacy that says, now that his adulterous affairs have been exposed, do as I say, not as I do. In other words, Campbell was a hypocrite. And that would be fine, if it weren’t for that fact that Campbell, along with his fellow Calvinistic pastors, pompously dare to demand that everyone live according to the anti-human moral precepts and teachings of the Bible. When these so-called mouthpieces of God are found out to be less than their bio suggests, it is certainly fair for unbelievers such as myself to point out the hypocrisy. If Evangelicals don’t like having their sins exposed to the light of day, I suggest that they quit exposing what they believe are the moral failures of believers and unbelievers alike and admit that they are every bit as “fallen” as the rest of us.
From an atheistic and humanistic perspective, I feel sad for Anne Campbell and her children. The stain of their father’s and husband’s sin and death will be with them forever. Anne Campbell will always be viewed as a woman who extracted some sort of payback by exposing her husband’s affairs. Silent while her husband was living, Anne has unleashed her scorn and wrath on those who dared to let her husband into their beds. It will be interesting to see if the Point Free Church can survive this scandal.
Ian Campbell’s body lies in a grave, returning to the earth from whence it came. His secrets and his tragedy live on, but he does not. There is no hell, so no eternal punishment of fire and brimstone await. The only hell is that which Campbell left behind.
Note
The Free Church of Scotland, a Fundamentalist sect that is Calvinistic and Evangelical in belief, has one hundred congregations with a total membership of about 12,000.
My editor sent me the following comment:
Humans are such complex characters. It is probably unfair that we ask more of certain people than we do of others – clergy, office holders, others in high positions – and of ourselves. Of course, we despise certain characteristics in ourselves, even as we continue to engage in the despised behaviors. But we expect those to whom we admire, and those who have sought high positions, to be better than we are. I am reminded of your post just yesterday when your congregant objected when you admitted you knew what it was to lust after a woman.
I concur. It is time for Evangelicals to stable the moral high horse, and rejoin the human race. Then posts such as this one won’t need to be written. The story then is that of a bad marriage, a scorned woman, and a man who couldn’t keep his pants zipped up. It is probable that Campbell’s religious beliefs fueled his suicide attempts. Campbell broke his marriage vows, as countless people do, but such lapses don’t normally lead to suicide. Throw religion, particularly Evangelical Christianity, into the mix and that changes everything. Imagine the depths of Campbell’s guilt, fear, and shame. It is not hard to imagine a follower of Jesus, in a moment of despair, turning to suicide.
I heard this guy ay a convention 5 years ago. My minister and I didn’t like his delivery- it was old school, too theatrical as if he was putting on a show. Perhaps he was.
I am sad for the situation but also angry. He was a hard line sabbath observer and wrote books about keeping sunday work free. My church thought it was a grey issue and up to the individual. How dare he lecture us on doing a few hours work on Sunday when he was screwing other people’s wives.
Thanks for sharing this. I had heard of Campbell, but had no personal contact with him.
A very very tragic story. Maybe we shouldn’t hold our leaders to higher standards, but if you accept any sort of public office, church office or are a celebrity you must KNOW that in this day and age, your secret sins, your hypocrisy will be discovered somewhere along the line. It’s delusional to think they will stay hidden. And the sensation-seeking press and social media will try to magnify and publish many untruths about your failings whilst doing a necessary job of exposing you.
You are right….this is the world we live in.
I have been lied about, had my words distorted, and been slandered both on the internet and in the local paper. These things used to bother the hell out of me. Now? I accept that this is the price of admission.
I am far from perfect, but I do try to live my life honestly, openly, and with integrity. Do I have secrets? Sure. All of us have embarrassing things we have done that we wouldn’t want other people to know. That said, my secrets pale in comparison to the stories I publish on this blog. No secret harems. ? I can’t handle the woman I got. ?
My worst sin of late is eating Polly’s candy bar. She knows I LOVE candy bars, so when we buy some she will hide her cut from her candy loving husband.
I found her stash….so I guess deep secret this week is that I am a candy bar thief. ? Nothing $2 can’t fix.
You probably did it on the Sabbath too but you don’t admit that to the public, do you!
Such shocking revelations, Bruce, hope Polly – and the Pope – can forgive you!!!! This is easy to say, but not easy to practise, but trolls and cyberbullies have achieved their aim if they succeed in distressing or even destroying the person they troll or bully. The victim has given them exactly what they want, so I determined early on, never to let that happen, never to let them win. Thanks again for all you blog about – and for keeping your head above the parapet as it were against so much fundy wrongdoing.
This guy sounds like a Christian version of Trump
I wouldn’t go that far. In public he said all the right things and came across as a very pious Calvinist of the older school. Trump is brash and rude in public.
Since my change of heart on religion a number of calvinist heros have been debunked. Mark Driscoll was to me a prophet sent from god to raise up a generation of culturally relevant calvinists. But he was shown to be an egotistical bully who may have loved jesus but also loved being a big shot celebrity. Mark came to my city in the UK with a talk entitled something like ’16 things wrong with British evangelicals’. Like Campbell, Driscoll now seems very hypocritical.
The lesson to both christians and non christians is perhaps don’t be too forgiving of loud mouth leaders. If you suspect they are bad news – they probably are. I used to say Chatasmatic faith healers are probably nice genuine guys – if misguided. Now I say they are all without exception dangerous, idiots at best, or con men.
Disjointed rant over!
Regarding charismatic faith healers, in a previous life I was influenced by the late John Wimber. He was a genuine nice guy, not a crook. Put simply, his life experiences caused him to believe what he did. Few people are willing and/or able to do the critical thinking necessary to reject deep-seated beliefs. I wouldn’t regard them as idiots, though. Deceived, yes, dangerous, maybe, but we can all be that at times.
From the same island as Trump’s mother.
Why am I not surprised that so much black-collar misbehavior involves sexual crime, infidelity and exploitation?
I am reminded of what William Blake wrote in “Songs of Experience”:
Prisons are built from stones of law,
Brothels from bricks of religion.
I was watching the movie “Constantine” recently, it is one of those God vs. Devil movies where the Catholic church is assumed to be a potent defender against Satan and his minions. (For the Catholic church to have an apparent supernatural power requires a special effects budget.) One of the major plot points (spoiler alert) is that Constantine committed suicide as a youth, spent a day in Hell (which apparently seems like a lifetime), but was revived and goes on to be an exorcist/demon hunter (have I lost you yet?!) (The bit of Catholic dogma of suicide victims being Hell-bound is used yet again for another character in the same movie.)
My question would be this, because John Constantine would be able to repent his sin of suicide (more like an attempted suicide since in the end it didn’t work.) Shouldn’t he be able to get the benefit of a Heavenly destination? The movie (spoiler alert) ends up giving him another chance by selfless action, and even has the Devil cure his lung cancer.
Yes it doesn’t make much sense to me either, and it is one reason why these kinds of movies that are predicated on the Catholic church being a legit saintly enterprise with magical powers of Heaven don’t work for me.
And an even deeper irony is that Calvinism claims that every evil in the world was planned/ordained/foreordained/willed by God. According to many Calvinist leaders and Martin Luther, God has a hidden will; see John Piper’s article on the “two wills” of God.
So every unjust action of Ian Campbell was planned by God.
Even worse, according to Calvinists, every evil action gives God glory!!
Heck, a famous Calvinist leader told me personally, that God will get whatever glory he deserves even from the Jewish Holocaust.
Sick, sick, sick…
“So every unjust action of Ian Campbell was planned by God.
Even worse, according to Calvinists, every evil action gives God glory!!
Heck, a famous Calvinist leader told me personally, that God will get whatever glory he deserves even from the Jewish Holocaust.
Sick, sick, sick…”
Well, the Bible actually says that God is glorified even by our sin, but it then adds that it does not give us the right to sin. Read Romans 3:1-8.
It reminds me how in our church scandals would generally result in shunning. And it was often about sex or some sort of power struggle between different leaders.
Shame often can lead to suicide so it is possible that the threat of exposure has caused him to commit suicide. Here in the Netherlands there have recentely been a few cases where men were arrested for sex with an underage prostitute – which they may have known but also may not; that’s rather unclear – and I believe two of these men commited suicide because of the coming exposure and trial. So far the police had kept their families and newspaper and so on out of it, but that would no longer be the case when it comes to trial.
Anyway, so you see – or saw since it really doesn’t matter anymore right now 😉 – those Bible texts as also a condemnation of suicide because it is murder of self? Because I only see a condemnation of murder in them, not necessarily of suicide itself. I remember when my cousin – when I was 13 or so – first told me that suicide would get people into hell and I was very upset about it, because I had a suicidal relative. And so now I had to worry about their eternal fate as well as their earthly one.
My dad said that God would understand when I told him. That Judas and King Saul and those other suicides in the Bible went to hell because they disobeyed God and not because of the suicide itself. (Both Saul and Judas have two differing stories of how they died, by the way…) That God wouldn’t punish Christians for having mental health problems that resulted in suicide.
Anyway like I said, it no longer really matters, yet I was glad that my dad didn’t believe this, because it made God so much more cruel that he would send his own people to hell when their lives already were a hell half of the time.
I’ve always liked the explanation in the movie “Beetlejuice”, that suicide victims become the civil servants of the afterlife. I don’t actually believe it, but it is amusing anyway.
Melody’s point about suicide: Arthur Schopenhauer, the famously pessimistic German philosopher, has an interesting take on suicide and the Bible. This is from his essay “On Suicide.” The whole essay is worth a read.
He says, “It is only the monotheistic, that is to say, the Jewish religions, whose members regard self-destruction as a crime. This is all the more striking in that neither in the Old nor in the New Testament is there to be found any prohibition or even definite disapproval of it, so that religious teachers have to base their proscription of suicide on philosophical grounds of their own invention, which are however so poor that …they resort to abuse.” 🙂
Pingback:Blindsided: The True Story of the Circumstances Surrounding the Death of Iain Campbell | The Wartburg Watch 2017
I asked an Orthodox Presbyterian minister if he thought Campbell was saved. He ignored the question. They also defend Donald Mac Leod after his mulitiple scandals. This idea that Calvinists have authority to push others around is ridiculous. After watching Calvinists for years, a denial of responsibility in themselves and their heroes is evident.
Proof texts deleted.
Try using your own words. I know it’s hard, but you can do it. 😈
Calvinists don’t teach that in order to be saved one must persevere to the end. That would indeed be a conditional salvation that is unbiblical. Calvinists actually hold to the Bible’s very clear teaching that having been saved Christians will necessarily persevere as Christ will lose no-one whom the Father has given him. This subtle, but seismic, difference demonstrates a muddled view not only of Calvinism but the Bible itself. Otherwise, are we to take God as having no power to save to the uttermost? Can we override his providence? None of that was a teaching of John Calvin.
Besides, those who abandon the faith shouldn’t wish to claim to have been saved should they? Not if they wish to be consistent. After all, they’ve rejected Christ so why would they want to be with him for all eternity? So your beef with “Calvinists” saying that your apostasy gives every indication that you weren’t saved in the first place is misplaced – why argue the point if you’re happy in your rejection of Christ?
Is Dr Campbell in hell? No man can say. I leave that to the Lord who does all things well. Did he repent at the end? No man can say. It would appear he was unapologetic to his wife and family, and his suicide may well indicate an unrepentant end. But who knows a man’s heart but the Lord? And who was privy to Dr Campbell’s thoughts at the end of his life?
Nice try. You are making a distinction without a difference. Regardless of the “power” behind perseverance (or preservation), it is the individual that must do so to, in the end, gain eternal life. Having pastored scores of Calvinists, I know they can quote the dogma, but when it comes to persevering, they knew it was on them to persevere to the end.
I argue the point because Calvinists refuse to let me tell my own story; forcing their dogma on my story instead of taking it at face value. You say you are a Christian and I accept that at face value. Your life, your story. I expect the same treatment from Evangelical Christians.
Oh, it’s a very clear teaching all right. It says we don’t have to do anything to get to heaven. Then it says if we don’t do something, we won’t get to heaven.
It’s a teaching that says, “I love you forever and will never forsake you,” and afterward says, “You are a disobedient and stiff-necked people that I am going to destroy.”
Bruce hasn’t rejected Christ. He’s rejected the soul-draining religion called Christianity that says, “I love you” and then says “I’m going to burn you to a crisp.”
It’s psychotic, it’s intentionally-contradictory, and it’s kept the people confused and off balance for two-thousand years.
Calvinism is simply incoherent. It basically denies the one thing that God intended in the first place – real two-way relationship with human beings and puts everything on God and takes any responsibility from people and thinks that God is glorified if someone decides they no longer want to be with God by saying “Well, they were never saved/genuine in the first place.”
It does not correspond to real life, real choices or the overall message that is contained within the documents that make up what we call the bible.
It’s only incoherent because you have different theology than Calvinists. The Bible is a hopelessly contradictory book that can be used to prove any and every theological position. When asked who is right, I reply, “They all are.”