No, Charlie Kirk Was not a “Good Man”

Written by

Listen to the Trump Administration and MAGA talking heads, and you might conclude that Charlie Kirk was a “good man.” President Trump would have us believe that leftists are to blame for Kirk’s murder, but extant evidence suggests that Kirk’s rhetoric and bigotry likely played a big part in his death. After carefully examining what Kirk said and did, it is hard not to conclude that he was a Christian Nationalist; a man willing to say anything — even if it is a lie — to advance his agenda. A good man, he is not.

Podcaster Stephen Woodford recently released a video detailing Charlie Kirk’s character and beliefs:

Video Link

Bruce Gerencser, 69, lives in rural Northwest Ohio with his wife of 48 years. He and his wife have six grown children and thirteen grandchildren. Bruce pastored Evangelical churches for twenty-five years in Ohio, Texas, and Michigan. Bruce left the ministry in 2005, and in 2008 he left Christianity. Bruce is now a humanist and an atheist.

Your comments are welcome and appreciated. All first-time comments are moderated. Please read the commenting rules before commenting.

You can email Bruce via the Contact Form.

Comments

15 responses to “No, Charlie Kirk Was not a “Good Man””

September 15, 2025

John S.

Excellent video by Stephen, and captures my own thoughts on the assassination of Charlie Kirk. I especially appreciate that he begins with a condemnation of political violence and murder, specifically Charlie Kirk’s. Any violence, particularly for political reasons, is abhorrent. The murder of the Democratic politicians in Minnesota. January 6th. And yes, Charlie Kirk.

That said, I agree with you Bruce that Kirk’s rhetoric cannot be divorced from his tragic end. I wholeheartedly believe in free speech, especially when it comes to an individual’s right to express and hold to their personal viewpoints. At the same time, this freedom needs reasonable guardrails. Preachers showing up to a gay pride event to hector the participants, for example. Not appropriate, any more than anti-theists showing up to someone’s church in order to disrupt the service. Both groups of folks should be able to participate in their activity with a reasonable sense of peace and tranquillity.

Kirk created an atmosphere of performance and specialized in making folks uncomfortable. I certainly do not feel he is a hero. At the same time, I don’t believe his or any else’s tragic death should ever be celebrated.

My wife had a good take on this- he lived by the sword, and ended up dying by it.

Reply
September 16, 2025

GeoffT

I agree entirely with what you say Bruce, with what John says above, and what Stephen says in his excellent video. Trouble is the whole sad event is being turned, somewhat paradoxically, into the polar opposite of what the Right want to portray Kirk as standing for. JD Vance is openly calling for any criticism of Kirk to be scrutinised for retaliatory action, and already there are many examples of people being fired from jobs for posting comments not dissimilar to those expressed in the video. Of course Kirk himself didn’t really believe what he espoused. Defending the rights of anyone and their neighbour to own guns as being the price to be paid for school shootings just can’t be squared with his rhetoric condemning the rights of others with whom he took issue, LGBT, transgender, climate scientists, gun control advocates, and indeed anyone to the left of his views. Then there’s the hypocrisy of the squalling and screeching coming from the Right about the ‘radical’ left and their tendency to violence. Where was their condemnation when Nancy Pelosi’s husband was shot, or other democratic politicians more recently? In fact, looking at the history of domestic terrorism and random gun violence in the US it is, almost entirely, undertaken by people with extreme right wing views. Trump saying that he doesn’t care about uniting the country is perhaps the most obscene thing he has ever said. He is President of all Americans, not just those who side with him.

Reply
1. September 16, 2025
  
  Troy
  
  @GeoffT Paul Pelosi was bludgeoned with a hammer, he wasn’t shot. This doesn’t change much as Kirk and the other right wingers (Don Jr. etc.) made fun of the incident. Charlie Kirk even asked his listeners to bail out the assailant. Other right wingers implied that the man wasn’t a Qanon right wing loon who broke into the house, but was a paid sex worker.
  
  Reply
September 16, 2025

Aspen Perez

All this groveling by the mainstream media to white wash Kirk’s image is making me sick. Long ago, I blocked him on Twitter (before I knew who he was) because his tweets were so disgusting it would ruin my day.

Reply
September 16, 2025

Ben Berwick

One of the deep ironies of Trump, Musk etc decrying left-wing violence is that few of them, if any, denounced the murders of Melissa Hortman and her husband. When right-wingers wage aggression against the left, you hear crickets and nothing else from the right.

Reply
September 16, 2025

Jeff Bishop

As per Bruce’s title and alluded to already, Charlie was only a “good man” for those that subscribe to a racist, intolerant, and hate filled ideological agenda.

As another pod caster stated, which reflects my own thoughts, citizens, even one so odious as Charlie should not be shot expressing views.

Do I feel “empathy” for Charlie – absolutely not. He stated publicly, multiple times, that American Citizens killed, including school rooms full of elementary age children, is an acceptable “collateral damage” for the ideal of unlimited gun rights. This is the raving of an unhinged lunatic. Ironically Charlie caught a bullet and is now part of the “acceptable” collateral damage.

Gun violence is the #1 cause of death among American youth. A staggering and disgraceful indictment and stain on the American character.

Latest published statistics: (2023) 46,728 Americans dead from gun related injuries (in a one year period).
Compare that with total USA military deaths during the Vietnam war (Aro 10 years) KIA: 58,281.

Of course the maga lunatics are using his death for “political capital” when there is zero evidence the shooter was in any way affiliated with left wing or liberal causes.

Of course not one “peep” from maga lunatics about the multiple shooting and killings of Democrats, most notably the husband and wife politicians from Minnesota, nor the Colorado school shootings on the same day, or the over 100 shootings and subsequent deaths of Americans on this, SAME DAY.

Citizens, I recommend you acquaint yourself with Nazi Martyr “Horst Wessel” and the burning of the Reichstag. If it is not clear by now, Trump and Maga intend to seize authoritarian control of the Government, eliminate the separation of powers, shred the constitution and incarcerate dissenting voices. If not Charlie, they will ultimately find their perfect Martyr (or event) as a reason to seize power soon, using the various police agencies and the military to declare martial law. They are in fact doing so now in various cities. It’s coming, as sure as the sun rising and setting. This was their agenda all along.

Perhaps the only hope for the preservation of the Union is if American military leaders refuse to implement the order.

Reply
September 16, 2025

Troy

I live next to a U.S. post office and was disgusted I had to look at the flag at half staff for a couple of days to honor this piece of crap. I won’t miss him, though I wish the shooter hadn’t thrown his life away. There are a lot of annoying people that say things you won’t like. But the pen is mightier than the sword, I truly believe that. Especially living in MAGA USA he could have been a seed of reason. (I’m assuming he was on the left, something not known at this time.) I should also mention the Charlie Kirk tactic of ambushing college freshmen, who likely aren’t skilled debaters, nor have had time to consider the nuances during debate is a sorry method of discourse. Kirk of course always did it with a smile and kindly disposition. Hostility just digs people in. It’s like a grown man beating up children and then strutting for his prowress. It truly is disgusting.

Reply
1. September 16, 2025
  
  Bruce Gerencser
  
  Our postmistress refused to lower the flag. ❤️
  
  Reply
  1. September 16, 2025
    
    Sage
    
    I am impressed, good for her. Did she say why?
    
    Reply
September 16, 2025

ObstacleChick

People should be free to espouse their opinions. They should not be targeted violently for their speech. To do so is anathema to what the First Amendment of the US Constitution says. However, we teach our kids that words and actions have consequences and that we should be mindful before speaking and acting. Usually, the consequences of words are that someone’s feelings are hurt or offended, or uplifted. I think most decent people agree that violence is not the answer. However, given the current political situation, I am concerned that even saying what I said could subject me to punishment.

Reply
February 23, 2026

crogonintJames Long

You self-gratifying, moronic half-wits are the veritable definition of what is wrong with this country. Too many syllables? Let me fix it for you: You’re f*cking idiots. You should turn in your voter registration cards, and keep your mouths shut while informed citizens make responsible decisions.

Go find the video of Charlie Kirk going off the rails when an actual racist showed up at one of his events. You’re going to have to dig through the hundreds of videos of him talking about the subject. HELL, just watch a handful of videos of him talking about racism!

Quite bluntly, Charlie Kirk was assassinated because morons like you believe whatever propaganda the mass media and social media regurgitates onto their (your) screen. Charlie Kirk, a good man with a loving family and a following of tens of thousands, was murdered because of dumb-a$$es like you, who can’t be bothered to check and see if the horse manure that’s being shoveled in from of them is true.

Go F yourselves. Preferably with something sharp that leaves jagged cuts which won’t stop bleeding.

Reply
1. February 23, 2026
  
  Bruce Gerencser
  
  Aw, you hurt our feelings. 🤣🤣 Does this schtick ever work, Genius?
  
  Thank you for reminding everyone you voted for. 🤣
  
  Reply
2. February 25, 2026
  
  GeoffT
  
  Well Crogonint, you certainly know how to string a few words together, even multi syllables, though your colourful language and expletives do somewhat take away from the, sadly misdirected, point you try to make. I don’t know if you regard yourself as an informed citizen, though I suspect that you are, at least, a citizen. I’m the opposite. I live in the UK so I’m just informed.
  
  You have no idea what Charlie Kirk stood for. Yes, he could stand in front of an audience that appeared opposed to his views and pretend to debate, but in reality what he did was practice a particular rhetorical style prior to each debate, invite his audience to defend their opposing viewpoint, use it as a pivot to propagate his horrible agenda, then claim he won the debate. It worked initially because he was playing a game that opponents hadn’t prepared for but once he encountered serious pushback he was unable to handle it.
  
  One need look no further than his unwavering support for Donald Trump, perhaps the greatest threat to freedom of speech in recent times. No serious proponent of free speech could possibly support such an authoritarian and divisive figure. He tried to pretend that the Jan 6 events didn’t amount to an insurrection, then said that the insurrectionists weren’t genuine Trump supporters anyway. He referred to the criminal who attempted to kill Nancy Pelosi and her husband as a ‘patriot’. He was, in short, a hypocrite, one who constantly insisted on rights for himself, but decried others when they attempted to invoke theirs. Much like you are implicitly trying to do to others on this site by your suggestion that they refrain from voting, even “keep your mouths shut”.
  
  Delightful comments from a clearly delightful person. Oh, one last thought. If you want to espouse your hateful and illogical opinions here then I suggest you adopt a more measured tone. I can assure you that readers here are more than capable of dealing with you at an intellectual level, and many are likely to be less polite than me.
  
  Reply
3. February 25, 2026
  
  Zoe
  
  Mr. Long: “You should turn in your voter registration cards, and keep your mouths shut while informed citizens make responsible decisions.”
  
  Zoe: And if they don’t? Then what Mr. Long? Throw them in a detention center? Deport them? Accuse them of treason? F them with sharp objects? How do you propose you keep their mouths shut if they don’t listen to you?
  
  Reply
February 24, 2026

Bruce Gerencser

Yep. I am a proud Pacifist, though I pragmatically recognize the need for self-defense. I oppose political assassinations. Of course, I also oppose kidnapping heads of state.

Charlie Kirk, and now his wife, are grifters; people who use faux Christianity and patriotism to enrich themselves.

Trump’s speech tonight was an attack on our government and everyone who dares to disagree with him. He’s a malignant narcissist, and quite honestly, he’s suffering from dementia. And his cabinet is not far behind him.

I have actively followed politics for sixty years. I have NEVER seen anything like that hot load of shit 💩 Herr Trump delivered tonight. 🤬🤬He’s a national disgrace. He significantly lied more times than he told the truth. And using servicemen and other hurting people as political props is beyond belief.

I did agree with him on one thing: banning Congress from buying/selling stocks. I suspect he and his feckless, immoral band of henchmen will be exempt if this law is ever passed.

Reply