Quote of the Day: Why Evangelicals Are Such Bad Christians

quote of the day

Yesterday, I read an article about vertical and horizontal morality; that most Evangelicals practice vertical morality. I found this to be the best explanation for the bad behavior we see from Evangelicals. How do we explain their overwhelming support of Donald Trump? How do we explain trolls such as Revival Fires, Dr David Tee, Jaisen, and John, to name a few? These under overpass dwellers have all the right beliefs, but treat people they disagree with like shit. Why? They have vertical morality. The problem, of course, is that Jesus primarily taught his followers horizontal morality.

Caroline Bologna writes:

For many Americans, the gap between Christian teachings and MAGA politics is baffling. How can people profess faith in Jesus ― who preached love, mercy and care for the oppressed ― while supporting policies that punish immigrants, demonize LGBTQ people and glorify cruelty?

The key to understanding this apparent contradiction might lie in something called “vertical morality.”

This ethical framework measures righteousness not by goodness to others, but by something more simplistic. Below, Christian advocates and former fundamentalists break down what vertical morality means and how it explains our political landscape today.

….

“Vertical morality teaches that authority, power and a moral code of right and wrong, or acceptable and unacceptable, come from ‘above’ ― an external superior who designates rules, systems and tenets that must be obeyed by those beneath,” said Tia Levings, a former Christian fundamentalist and author of “A Well-Trained Wife: My Escape from Christian Patriarchy.”

In the context of religion, the superior is God. In politics, it might be an authoritarian dictator. In a cult, it would be the controlling leader. Whatever the circumstances, the idea is that behaviors are only right or wrong based on what the figure in power says.

“Vertical morality in Christianity is the idea that our ethics and behaviors have a duty to please God alone. We get our morals from God and we must obey him, furthering the will of God no matter the cost,” said April Ajoy, author of “Star-Spangled Jesus: Leaving Christian Nationalism and Finding A True Faith.”

….

“Vertical morality is just how I describe what’s called ‘divine command theory’ in metaethics,” she said. “I’m a teacher, so I’m always looking for ways to make complicated concepts a little more simple. It’s basically the idea that morality comes from authority above, which is what I was taught when I was raised within conservative Christianity.” [Rachel Klinger King]

Vertical morality stands in contrast to the concept of horizontal morality, another term Klinger Cain has broken down in her videos. 

“Horizontal morality prioritizes the well-being of our neighbors, communities and personal relationships,” Ajoy explained. “We act in ways that cause the least amount of harm to those around us, regardless of beliefs. Someone with vertical morality may help someone in need because they believe that’s what God wants them to do, versus someone with horizontal morality may help that same person for the benefit of the person that needs help.”

Rather than unquestioning obedience and superficial optics, this approach focuses on genuine empathy, compassion, and love toward others, recognizing the actual effects our actions have on people.

….

In Matthew 25, Jesus describes people who fed and clothed those in need, who welcomed the stranger, who took care of the sick and visited those in prison,” she noted. “He then says, ‘What you did for the least of these, you did for me.’ He equates loving our neighbors (horizontal morality) with loving Christ (vertical morality).” [April Ajoy]

….

“Evangelicals are taught that all morality comes from God and therefore true goodness can only be spread by obeying God, even if it harms people around us,” Ajoy said. “This isn’t necessarily a bad thing if pleasing God manifests by following the teachings of Jesus ― loving our neighbors, loving our enemies, promoting peace and taking care of the poor, the widow, the immigrant and standing up for the marginalized. It becomes dangerous when Christians weaponize this vertical morality for power, which is exactly what we’re seeing with the Christian nationalism in the Trump administration.” [April Ajoy]

“What’s interesting is that Jesus taught a compassionate, flexible, grace-filled view of what it means to live a life loving God,” Levings noted. “But today’s conservative Christianity is less influenced by Jesus and more by the Old Testament and Paul.”

She pointed to theonomy, the belief that Old Testament laws should be applied to modern society, as an influence on Christian nationalist politics.

ummarizing the role of vertical morality in the Old Testament, Klinger Cain highlighted the story of Abraham, who was commended for his willingness to obey God’s command to sacrifice his son Isaac, despite the act’s inherent immorality.

“What should happen if you have a horizontal moral system is, you should go, ‘I’m not murdering someone, even if an authority figure has told me to do that,’” she said. “But under vertical morality, that would be a sin because you’re disobeying God.”

Drawing from the most violent and extreme chapters of Biblical history, this approach frames unquestioning obedience as the highest virtue, even when it demands actions that defy compassion or common sense. And what might’ve once been a religious debate has now become a broader cultural conflict thanks to the role of conservative Christians in writing Project 2025 and otherwise shaping public policy.

“The problem with MAGA Christians is that they promote policies that often go against the teachings of Jesus,” Ajoy said. “They justify it by promoting a view of God that is vengeful. They demonize all immigrants as criminals, all queer people as predators, all leftists as violent and all Democrats as satanic ― with no evidence to back these claims. And because they believe in a literal hell and a God-ordained calling to make the nation Christian, they justify cruelty in the name of ‘tough love.’”

Under a vertical moral system, the worst thing you can do is disobey God’s laws, and this perspective has bled into politics as well. Klinger Cain offered the example of the rather callous response to “Alligator Alcatraz” and the extremely punitive treatment of immigrant detainees from MAGA Christians.

“On one side, we’re looking at people who are undocumented, so yes, they’ve broken a rule. But for the most part, there are no victims ― so why is our government being so harsh?” she said. “But the other side, with this fundamental Christian worldview, sees every broken rule as deserving a super harsh punishment. You don’t have to be a murderer or a rapist to go to hell. Every broken rule leads to hell ― even just taking a bite of an apple cursed all of humanity.”

This religious viewpoint desensitizes people, so inhumane immigrant detention feels fine and deserved. Klinger Cain added that, for people with this perspective, the only way to escape the fate of hell is not through good actions but simply by being on the right God-ordained MAGA team.

“Vertical morality has caused white conservative, MAGA-aligned Christianity to completely abandon the core of Christ’s teachings because their focus is on self-interest and perceived moral purity,” Hale said. “To them, they are Christians and haven’t abandoned the faith at all, but their framework measures righteousness in a way that can excuse behaviors that the general public knows and sees aren’t Christlike at all.”

This system also demonizes empathy. Some conservative authors have even written books describing empathy as sinful or “toxic.”

“If Abraham had empathized too much with his son and chosen not to kill him, then that empathy would have been a sin,” Klinger Cain said. “We’ve seen this concept play out in Christianity with pastors telling parents not to allow their children to be gay, even if it hurts them. The idea is don’t allow your empathy to support sin in this way.”

….

“Vertical morality feels safe in chaotic times, when ‘figuring things out’ or ‘learning from past mistakes’ feels daunting,” Levings said. “It’s also easier to comply with when the bottom-dwelling citizens feel like they have little power or agency to resist an authoritarian system. Sometimes, compliance is a matter of survival, and agreeing with it is a necessary means of getting along and staying safe.”

Hale agreed that vertical morality feels easier and less complicated than actually confronting systemic issues and the complexities of social justice. 

“It’s easy to measure your faith by private devotion or rules that you think are in the bible, rather than by how you show up in the world,” she said. “The unfortunate part is that it can blind people to injustice and sometimes cause them to justify harmful behavior. When your focus is on individual righteousness rather than collective responsibility, you don’t learn how to show up for others ― you only care about your own journey.”

As a result, Hale added, you risk fostering a society where people aren’t held accountable for harmful actions and can be cruel and exclusionary, as long as they are “good Christians.” Rather than social responsibility, it’s all about personal salvation.

“We’re seeing vertical morality weaponized today in the Trump administration,” Ajoy said. “If they can convince people that they are ‘of God,’ then it doesn’t matter who they hurt in the process. They say Christian things. They quote scripture. But they are wreaking havoc on the very people Jesus calls us to love and care for. It reminds me of another verse in Matthew 15 that says, ‘These people honor me with their lips, but their hearts are far from me.’”

“Vertical morality can’t take into consideration modern advancements or needs, evidence of failures, new research and information and human progress in civilization,” she explained. “Those with a vertical structure aren’t inclusive or accepting of other worldviews. Diversity can’t exist because it threatens the high contrast right-wrong rigidity found in fundamentalist authoritarianism.”

— End of Quote —

Bruce Gerencser, 69, lives in rural Northwest Ohio with his wife of 48 years. He and his wife have six grown children and thirteen grandchildren. Bruce pastored Evangelical churches for twenty-five years in Ohio, Texas, and Michigan. Bruce left the ministry in 2005, and in 2008 he left Christianity. Bruce is now a humanist and an atheist.

Your comments are welcome and appreciated. All first-time comments are moderated. Please read the commenting rules before commenting.

You can email Bruce via the Contact Form.

Comments

21 responses to “Quote of the Day: Why Evangelicals Are Such Bad Christians”

  1. BJW

    Shared on my Facebook page!

  2. Avatar
    Daniel Appleton

    Evangelicals obey unjust, unfair rules as long as they remain unaffected. They seem to lack much in the way of empathy because they see them ( ” them ” being non – white, non – English – speaking, non – Evangelical, non – European – American, LGBTQ +, etc. ) as the Other, & unequal, maybe even a threat to the idealized 1950s way of life shown in media of that time period ( The Andy Griffith Show, Make Room for Daddy ( ? ) Father Knows Best as examples ). This is blatant TRIBALISM, which is a TOOL of the so – called ” Christian Right “, which is neither Christian nor Right.

    1. Avatar

      The “empathy” issue has changed a lot over the years. When I first entered the ministry in the 70s, empathy for others was common among Evangelicals. Not the case today. Some Evangelicals now think empathy is a “sin.” Talk about bizarre thinking. 😢

      1. Avatar
        Asphalt-Type Person

        That’s because empathy will cause you to love people that God hates!
        You’ll be cOnDoNiNg ThEiR sIn!!!!!!!!! Eleventy!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    2. “Evangelicals obey unjust, unfair rules as long as they remain unaffected.” Absolutely!

  3. Neil Rickert

    A good analysis, but not quite right (in my opinion).

    For a Christian, vertical morality should be okay. But Christians are supposed to only apply that to themselves. Jesus said “Judge not, that ye be not judged”. Christians are not supposed to apply those vertical morality rules to others. For others, Christians are supposed to emphasize love and forgiveness.

    At least that’s how I have always understood it.

    1. Avatar

      I’m of the opinion that both vertical and horizontal morality are necessary for the Christian. Jesus himself said, Christians are to love God (vertical) and their fellow man (horizontal). Sadly, I see very little horizontal morality these days. 😢😢

  4. Avatar
    Kathy Fields

    Excellent explanation!

    1. Avatar

      That’s what I thought. This shows we can still learn new stuff. ❤️🤣❤️

      My adult Christian life began primarily as a vertical Christian. Over the next 50 years, my Christian life evolved. At the end I was definitely a horizontal Christian.

  5. Avatar
    GeoffT

    I can’t help but think the article is somewhat overblown in its analysis of a very obvious criticism of what is really divine command theory, but it’s useful in coining the terms vertical and horizontal morality. I’d sum it up thus: ‘true morality is doing what’s right regardless of what you are told, whilst religious morality is doing what you are told regardless of what’s right’.

  6. Avatar

    Caroline: ““Those with a vertical structure aren’t inclusive or accepting of other worldviews. Diversity can’t exist because it threatens the high contrast right-wrong rigidity found in fundamentalist authoritarianism.””

    Zoe: I threatens their perceived purity.

  7. It does seem like Christianity (and probably other religions) has to have an “other” to keep going. At least to keep going as it is. There always has to be some kind of fight going on. Fighting the devil, LGBTQ, democrats, a godless education system, etc. It’s like if people don’t stay stirred up/angry about something, religion loses momentum. I do know many Christians who don’t attend any church because of the current attitudes, especially the evangelical flavors. Many of my Christian friends are tired of always being against so many things. It really is exhausting. I also know evangelicals who have switched over to protestant/catholic churches because they are tired of all the BS. When I think about my Christian past, I realize now that the Methodist and Episcopal churches I attended did teach more of a horizontal morality. Maybe it was just those specific churches? Not sure.

  8. Avatar
    Terri

    A friend of mine has a son in his early 20s who wants to have a sex change. He has changed his name from “Brandon” to ” Brandie”. I’ve known this little one since he was a baby, even though he was adopted by my friend’s sister. Told us that hearing himself be called his original name ( the male version) makes him feel ending his life. He has suffered through alot anxiety and depression as well. We ( his Mom and i) told him that we would still love him if he was a girl, a boy or a frog. Because he thought, since we are people of faith, that we would reject him. He has a safe 🙏 place with us. Which is what he needs most. He told us that even on the online transgender support group, that other trans people on there were being mean to him. I know alot of trans people end up regretting going through with sex change, and apparently some of the injections they have to get (hormones injections, I guess) can be dangerous for their health. The last thing a young person like this needs is to be abandoned or rejected by people close to them. Jesus died 😢 to save the world, not to condemn it.

    1. Avatar

      You said:

      I know alot of trans people end up regretting going through with sex change

      Actual answer:

      Evidence suggests that less than 1% of transgender people who undergo gender-affirming surgery report regret. That proportion is even more striking when compared to the fact that 14.4% of the broader population reports regret after similar surgeries.

      You said:

      “apparently some of the injections they have to get (hormones injections, I guess) can be dangerous for their health.”

      My response:

      As far as gender affirming hormone therapy is concerned, sure there are risks involved, just as there are with any other drug treatment. However, to quote Johns Hopkins University, the “ risks of untreated gender dysphoria can be severe, there are also risks with taking hormones.”

      https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/health/treatment-tests-and-therapies/gender-affirming-hormone-therapy-gaht

      Finally, your claim that “Jesus died to save the world, and not condemn it,” is not helpful, and depending on the sect, spurious theologically. Knowing that most of the readers of this blog are non-Evangelicals, how is your claim (for which you have no evidence other than words in a fallible, errant, contradictory religious text) helpful?

      I am actually friends with several transgender people, including three people who are active participants on this blog — people, by the way, I love, admire, and respect. Here’s the one thing all of them want: to be left alone. Imagine you were on some sort of drug therapy or you had major, life altering surgery. How would you feel if people you didn’t know were publicly offering up their uneducated opinions about your drug therapy/surgery?

      Btw, your friend’s son’s “male name” is called a “dead name” by transgender people:

      “A deadname is the name a transgender or non-binary person used at birth but no longer uses after transitioning or changing their name. The term refers to the birth name as being “dead” to the individual, and using it (known as deadnaming) is considered an invalidating and harmful act that denies a person’s true identity. While the concept can technically apply to anyone who changes their name, the term “deadname” and the associated harm are specifically understood within the context of trans and gender nonconforming people.”

      Finally, is there a reason you didn’t use the proper pronouns for “Brandie”?

      1. Avatar
        matilddaa

        Well said, Bruce to Terri’s customary cluelessness. I asked my doctor daughter, who has transitioned and transitioning patients and sees patients who wish to discuss the possibility of transitioning. Doctors don’t just sign their names on documents ordering fellow medics to start treatment immediately. Long counselling sessions, evaluations and the advice of expert doctors in the field are all used to make sure this is the right treatment for anyone with gender dysphoria. And, anecdotally, she can’t think of any past or present transgender patient who has expressed regret. She can however, without breaking professional confidences, tell me of those who are so happy now to be their real selves. And she’s had two mothers, in their 70s tell her how pleased they are to see their transitioned adult children. They’d initially been shocked when their daughters told them they had begun the process, but now, one had tears in her eyes because her newly-transitioned son had sent her a picture of his first beard. She said, ‘Any initial misgivings I had, are gone. He’s so happy now, and isn’t that what we all want for our children’s lives?’
        Terri’s ‘Oh, I’m a super-spechul x-tian cos I’m nice to a transitioned person…..’ is just pathetic to me.

    2. Avatar
      Sage

      Terri, I am going to assume, based on your comment, that you are truly trying to support Brandie. So I am going to share some suggestions from my personal perspective

      First, telling someone you will love them if they were a “boy, girl or frog” may be good intentioned but misses the mark. First, referring to a “frog” can be problematic because many people, including a few politicians, love to dismiss transgender people by saying some version of “I identify as a chicken”. The intent is to mock and dismiss trangender people as confused or mentally ill. I suggest avoiding any comparison that is similar. In fact, I think it’s better to say “I love you for being you, and I support you.” Affirm support for Brandie as Brandie, and love for the person they are.

      Also take some time to educate yourself on trans issues and the challenges Brandie will face. If you truly want support and provide a safe space, then you need to understand what Brandie needs and feels. And you also need to prepare and educate yourself on the problems and issues you will face as a person who loves and supports a trans person. You will personally see, hear, and experience things that are difficult.

      Christians… I personally put up a wall when someone tells me they are a Christian. I am aware that not all Christian’s are a problem, but the reality is that the public face of christianity is to be bigoted and hateful toward trans people. Self preservation and safety require keeping a certain level of separation until truth is known about a Christian person.

      Online support groups, while they can be helpful, they can also attract many types of people. Every group has people who are mean, judgmental, or gatekeeping. Sometimes there are people who pretend to be trans just to disrupt or attack. This is true of any online forum. Perhaps you could help Brandie find a local qualified ( non Christian) therapist to help Brandie and suggest groups that can provide support.

      If Brandie was raised in a Christian household, and attended church regularly, they are likely carrying a lot of baggage from that experience. Religious teachings can be brutal and devastating for a trans person and lead them to hate and reject themselves. It’s difficult to explain in a way you can understand, but just know that a trans person in a Christian environment suffers on a whole different level that you cannot comprehend.

      As Bruce pointed out, you should talk to Brandie and determine what pronouns are proper. Let Brandie guide you. Brandie may know what is needed, or perhaps will experiment and change as they grow and learn and explore. Using a persons name and pronouns can be very affirming.

      Also as Bruce stated, the detransition rate is low. Most people who transition are happier. Unlike what you often hear, transitioning not an easy decision or an easy path, and people do not wake up one day suddenly feeling the need to transition.

      In fact, any people who detransition report they destransitioned due to religious pressure, family pressure, and other outside forces that make them so uncomfortable or hurt that they just give up. It hasn’t hanged who they are, but now they are back to hiding or even denying their true self.

      As for hormones, they carry risk for anyone taking them. For example, some cisgender women take hormones due to medical issues and use them for decades. They also carry risk, but the benefit is greater than the risk. This is not a uniquely trans thing, although many people act as if it is. Just be sure hormones are safely prescribed and monitored through a doctor.

      Finally, Brandie needs love and support. Having people who provide love, support, and are on their side is tremendously important. Brandie need people who are there to provide safety and support and even defense when it is needed.

  9. Avatar

    This is an interesting explanation for the cruelty of so many MAGA Evangelicals. They seem to like having a vindictive, punitive deity, and I suppose they consider themselves safe from punishment because they are on the correct team. They’ve been told that if someone follows the rules, they have nothing to worry about.

    If the MAGA evangelicals are getting everything they want from their Project 2025 wet dream, why aren’t they happy yet? What is the end goal? Dare I say that they want to silence, enslave, or eradicate dissenters like us?

    1. Avatar
      Asphalt-Type Person

      I think their end goal is to somehow persuade Jesus to return ahead of schedule…
      “Look how we cleaned up your planet! We killed off everyone you hate! Don’t you want to come back for us now because you love us more now that we did this?”

  10. Avatar
    Terri Beaudry

    Yeah, the frog thing wasn’t meant to demean, only to show unconditional love and affirmation. This little one in particular struggled with alot of self-hate. Needs alot of love.

  11. Avatar
    Bryce Englin

    Bruce

    Thanks for sharing. I always enjoy reading your writings and the things you share. One other thing I believe that may not have been mentioned here, but was potentially mentioned and very much inferred is that most in the vertical thinking sphere tend to look at things as a binary.

    I sadly believe this authoritative push which founds its way into overdrive with Norris, Hyles, Gray, their ilk and the 666 million claimed salvations have created the significant issues shared here.

    Put another way the behavioral character and actions of folks transcend religious ideologies.

    1. Avatar

      I think you are right. I’ve often thought about why I became a Fundamentalist Baptist. What was it in my personality and upbringing that drew me to the certainty of authoritarian Christianity?

Want to Respond to Bruce? Fire Away! If You Are a First Time Commenter, Please Read the Comment Policy Located at the Top of the Page.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Discover more from The Life and Times of Bruce Gerencser

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading