Yes, I Know, “Not All Evangelicals”

not like those evangelicals

Evangelicalism is a somewhat broad tent, with sects ranging from hardcore Fundamentalists to liberals who are Evangelical in name only. It is that last group that often emails and messages me, complaining I am wrongly lumping all Evangelicals together. These are the folks who should be mainline or liberal church members, but for some reason they like being Evangelicals or they remain in the cult because of family, employment, or familiarity. I don’t care one way or another, but I am not inclined to modify the word Evangelical just to satisfy their need to differentiate between themselves and the rest of Evangelicalism. Regular readers know that I never mean “all Evangelicals.” In fact, I never mean “all” anything. There will always be exceptions to the rule.

That said, the core doctrines that bind Evangelicals together are generally held by one and all, with allowances made for soteriological, eschatological, and practice differences. The same can be said for differences regarding Calvinism, Arminianism, Oneness, and cessationism/noncessationism. Worship practices can be very different too, yet core doctrinal beliefs are what bind these disparate sects together.

The Independent Fundamentalist Baptist (IFB) church movement is a subset of Evangelicalism. They too have a broad spectrum of beliefs and practices, yet most of them agree that there is a set of core doctrines that must be believed to be IFB. There are countless subsets within Evangelicalism, so it takes a good bit of effort and expertise to truly understand to understand the depth and breadth of Evangelicalism.

Within Evangelicalism, there are sects, pastors, and congregants working hard to reform the sect, but much like the Southern Baptist Convention, I am convinced that significant reform will not happen unless the structure is burnt to the ground. Sadly, Evangelical churches are content to start new programs, spice up their worship services, and hire pastors who are hip, cool, and sexy; men who dress in designer jeans with holes, $300 tennis shoes, and Rolex watches. Further, megachurches are the bane of Evangelicalism; churches that breed passive church members who attend one service a week, hoping their felt-needs are met.

Are there Evangelical churches out there truly following in the steps of Jesus? Sure, I am certain they exist. I just don’t know of any. The plot has been lost, and I see no way to get it back unless radical deconstruction takes place. This is unlikely since Evangelicals are known for certainty and arrogance. Deconstructing would require admitting you are wrong, and that is not how Evangelicals typically roll.

Bruce Gerencser, 69, lives in rural Northwest Ohio with his wife of 48 years. He and his wife have six grown children and thirteen grandchildren. Bruce pastored Evangelical churches for twenty-five years in Ohio, Texas, and Michigan. Bruce left the ministry in 2005, and in 2008 he left Christianity. Bruce is now a humanist and an atheist.

Your comments are welcome and appreciated. All first-time comments are moderated. Please read the commenting rules before commenting.

You can email Bruce via the Contact Form.

Comments

7 responses to “Yes, I Know, “Not All Evangelicals””

  1. Avatar
    Karen the rock whisperer

    This is the kind of issue that leads scientists to use the expression “tend(s) to” a lot. As in, “Evangelicals tend to [insert a Bruce generalization here].” It’s an attempt to belay the responses that offer an exception. It rarely works when the responders are indignant.

  2. Avatar
    JT

    I could write a series of blog posts on this topic, but will keep it to a severely condensed version. The main problem with church buildings today is that they fall into one of two buckets, for the most part (not “all”, right?).

    Bucket 1 says that we do things this way because we have always done it this way. Bucket 2 says we do it this way because it is the popular way to do it. This then flows down to the attendees of these buildings who go because they always have and are “supposed to” (bucket 1), or they go because it’s fun or entertaining (bucket 2). Neither model is biblical and most church members today don’t have a clue what the Bible actually says, but they’ll tell you they believe it.

  3. Avatar

    What i don’t understand are the people who choose to attend evangelical churches, claim that they’re “not like those evangelicals”, get mad that people think they ARE like “those” evangelicals, and won’t seek out a Church more in line with the values they purport to possess. Why stay in that? Why torture or stunt yourself?

    1. Avatar
      JT

      Hence why I read my Bible at home and no longer attend a church building. I have not found one in recent years that I care to associate my name with. Not saying they are all bad or the people in them are, just doesn’t make much sense to me anymore how it’s done.

    2. BJW

      I’m guessing that it’s the culture they are used to. Plus, they are also comfortable enough they don’t have to leave or change their movement name. I think they are cowards.

    3. Avatar
      matilddaa

      I understand what you’re saying if you’re in a place where there’s a choice of several or many other churches in a small radius of where you live. In this welsh village, when I was very involved in the evangelical anglican church, I noticed a couple of things. Folk who’d been attending since they were babies, stopped coming when age meant they gave up their car. Others offered lifts on Sundays, but it was as if they were relieved now they had an excuse to stop. I can see how they must feel relieved to stay indoors, keep warm and not sit in a hard pew in a cold ancient building. I imagine, though none said this, that if you’ve been listening to sermons for 7-8 decades, having to listen to a preacher’s wisdom on life, when he/she is young enough to be your great-grandchild, must have been tiring! But somehow, you couldn’t just go AWOL one Sunday, you had to give a plausible excuse – and I know that most eased any conscience they had by continuing to tithe to the church!

  4. Karen—I love it when some semi- literate (who may have an advanced degree) tries to shoot down your “tends to” statement with an isolated example. Case in point: In a panel discussion involving one such person, I mentioned that lawyers tend not to be tall or very physical. (I have noticed this and later came across research that confirmed it.) Said semi- literate bellowed back with the example of an acquaintance who was a college basketball player and practices mixed martial arts.

    Anyway, back to the Evangelical question. Jimmy Carter, who was liberal President for his time and went even further to the left (on issues like women’s and LGBTQ equality) after he left the White House, claimed to be a “born again” Christian. I haven’t heard that term in the past 30 years or so; when it was in wide use, I took it to mean something like “Evangelical:” When I was an Evangelical, it seemed that I had much in common with those who called themselves “Born Again.”

Want to Respond to Bruce? Fire Away! If You Are a First Time Commenter, Please Read the Comment Policy Located at the Top of the Page.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Discover more from The Life and Times of Bruce Gerencser

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading