Domestic Violence in the IFB Church

god domestic abuse

Domestic Violence in the IFB Church

Let me open by giving readers the definition for domestic violence. The National Domestic Violence Hotline defines domestic violence as follows:

Domestic violence can be defined as a pattern of behavior in any relationship that is used to gain or maintain power and control over an intimate partner.

Abuse is physical, sexual, emotional, economic or psychological actions or threats of actions that influence another person. This includes any behaviors that frighten, intimidate, terrorize, manipulate, hurt, humiliate, blame, injure or wound someone.

Domestic violence can happen to anyone of any race, age, sexual orientation, religion or gender. It can happen to couples who are married, living together or who are dating. Domestic violence affects people of all socioeconomic backgrounds and education levels.

Does the Independent Fundamentalist Baptist (IFB) church movement have a domestic abuse problem? The short answer is Yes!

The IFB church movement is built on a foundation of emotional and mental manipulation and abuse. This is seen in how parents discipline their children and how husbands lord over and control their wives. These behaviors are often modeled by IFB pastors, deacons, and church leaders as they manipulate, control, and dominate church members.

I know IFB readers of this blog are howling over what I have written here. How dare I suggest that the IFB church movement has an abuse problem. How dare I suggest IFB pastors and church leaders emotionally and mentally manipulate and control people. Child abuse? Domestic violence? Where do such things happen? says the IFB church member. I have never seen it.

And therein lies the problem. The abuse and violence are institutionalized to such a degree that it is considered normal. People are so used to seeing it that they never consider whether such behavior is appropriate. IFB church members are familiar with having their “toes stepped on.” They are accustomed to fire and brimstone, naming names, calling sin “sin,” sermons. They are used to aggressive behavior from their pastors. It seems quite normal to them. Those of us who were raised in the IFB church movement understand this. It took us getting away from it to see how manipulative and abusive it  is. The waiting rooms of mental health professionals are crowded with people whose mental wellness and self-esteem were ruined by Fundamentalist religion.

For those of us who spent decades in the IFB church, we know that the deep mental and emotional scars left by our time in the IFB church never go away. We learn to come to terms with our past and try to do the best we can going forward. We are marred, even broken, yet somehow, we find a way to pick up and move forward.

This is why some of us speak so openly about the IFB church movement and its manipulative and abusive tendencies. We don’t want ANYONE to experience what we experienced. When we see someone gravitating towards Fundamentalism we try to warn them as we would warn a person who is driving towards a cliff. Stop! Turn around!  Sadly, many people ignore these warnings and often pay a heavy price, emotionally, mentally, and sometimes physically, as a result.

Domestic violence in the IFB church movement is widespread. Unfortunately, it is often not seen as domestic violence by those who are devoted IFB church members. Instead, the use of domestic violence is often seen as being “true to the Bible” or being “a faithful follower of Jesus.” To understand this domestic violence,  we must first understand the theological underpinnings of such violence. Domestic violence often happens because husbands (it is almost always husbands who perpetrate the domestic violence in the IFB church) want to be obedient to the Bible, Jesus, and the pastors’ dictates. Remember, in the IFB church, the voice of God sounds an awful lot like the voice of the Pastor.

Here is what many IFB pastors preach to their church members:

  • Christ is the head of the church and the pastor is God’s man in the church.
  • The Bible is an inerrant, inspired text that should be literally interpreted and explicitly obeyed.
  • The husband is the head of home.
  • The wife is to submit to her husband.
  • The highest calling for a woman is to bear children and to be a keeper of the home. Many IFB pastors discourage women from working outside the home and from getting a college education (unless they go to college to get an MRS degree).
  • The husband is the authority, the disciplinarian, and the king of the home. God holds him, like he did Adam, responsible for everything that goes on in the home.
  • The Bible sanctions using violence when children disobey. If a parent does not spank or whip children, it  means the parent is not willing to obey the teachings of the Pastor and the Bible. The rod of correction is meant to be used to drive wickedness out of a child’s heart.

Now, none of these things, in and of  itself, necessarily lead to domestic abuse. However, add to this the IFB church preoccupation with sin and the portrayal of God as a violent deity who will whip them if they disobey, and you have a recipe for not only domestic abuse but also child abuse. I have watched more than a few IFB church members and pastors beat the hell out their children with a belt, switch, or paddle. I remember hearing of one parent who picked up a 2×4 and beat his two teenage girls with it. Why? The teen deliberately disobeyed him by riding the church bus home instead of going home with him.

I have admitted my own violent, abusive methods of correcting my three oldest children. Fortunately, I abandoned these practices with my three youngest children. My oldest sons routinely got thrashed for disobeying their parents. I corrected them this way because I thought that is what God wanted me to do. The books I read said this was the proper way to discipline children, and every big-name preacher I heard preach said I was doing right by my kids when I whipped them. Is it any surprise then, with Bible-sanctioned brutality against children and a violent God who uses violence to chastise disobedient IFB church members, that violent behavior spills over into the relationship between the husband and his submissive wife?

I can’t say that I know of many instances where a husband physically beat his wife. It happened, but not very often, to my knowledge. I know of a few pastors’ wives who were physically abused by their pastor husbands. The pastors were men of God in the pulpit, but at home they  were violent disciplinarians who ruled over their wives and children with a rod of iron. Most of the abuse I saw was more of the mental and emotional type. If the woman wasn’t submissive enough or didn’t put out sexually, she would pay for it. If she dared to have ambition, want to work outside the home, or go to college, she would be put in her place and reminded of God’s divine order for the home.

I have often said, I don’t know how ANY woman stays in the IFB church. Well, I do know. Women are afraid. They fear disobeying God, their husbands, and their pastors. They fear God will chastise them if they dare step outside the role God has ordained for them.  And so they stay and suffer the abuse.

Again, theology plays a big part in this. Many IFB pastors think that there are no grounds for divorce or that the only ground for divorce is adultery. Having a husband who is abusive, especially if it is emotional or mental abuse, is not grounds for divorce.

Let me give an illustration of how this is perpetuated from the pulpit:

Years ago the church I was pastoring joined together with other IFB churches to hold a joint revival meeting. The speaker was Bill Rice III. (I am almost certain it was Bill Rice but it could have been Pete Rice, both were associated with the Bill Rice Ranch.) One night, Bill Rice preached on the subject of marriage and divorce. Rice did not believe there were any grounds for divorce. He said that even if a husband was beating on his wife, the wife should stay in the marriage. Perhaps she would win her husband to Jesus by her willingness to stay in the marriage. Rice intimated that saved husbands don’t beat their wives.

By the time of this meeting my views had already begun to change and I pulled our church out of the meetings. I was incensed that Rice was advocating a woman endure beatings by her husband , the implication being that God wanted her to do so.

As my wife and I traveled beyond the IFB church movement, we had to relearn what it meant to have a healthy marital and family relationship. Ultimately, it took getting away from Christianity altogether for us to find wholeness.

I am not suggesting that every husband in the IFB church movement is abusive or that every father abuses his children when he disciplines them. I am suggesting that IFB theology encourages manipulation, violence and abuse, especially of the mental and emotional variety. Personally, I don’t think the IFB church movement is good for anyone. The extreme Fundamentalism found in the movement is emotionally and mentally harmful and people are better off finding other Christians sects to be a part of; sects that don’t view women as being inferior and don’t see children as chattel. I am of the opinion that the best thing that can happen to the IFB church movement is that it dies a quick death. It is dying, but it is dying slowly. I am all for smothering the movement in its bed.

Over the years, I have watched a number of women break free from domestic violence. They decided their own personal self-worth and happiness was more important than supposed obedience to God, the Bible, the pastor, and their husbands. Most often, gaining their freedom required them to divorce their husbands.

Let me head off  those who might suggest that the reason there is domestic abuse and child abuse in the IFB church movement is because they misinterpret the Bible. I don’t think this is the case at all. I think abusers are being consistent with their beliefs and they accept the Bible as written. After all, the Bible does command a father to beat his children with a rod. The Bible does command the wife to be submissive to her husband and to be a keeper of the home. And let’s face it, the Bible is a written record of the violence God pours out and will yet pour out on all those who do not worship or obey him. The good news is that many Christians ignore or explain away vast parts of the Bible. They know beating children is wrong. They know demanding a wife submit to her husband is demeaning. They wisely reject such things.

Do you have a story to tell about domestic violence? What did you experience growing up in the IFB church? What went on in your IFB home when the doors were closed? Please share your thoughts in the comment section.

050219

About Bruce Gerencser

Bruce Gerencser, 62, lives in rural Northwest Ohio with his wife of 41 years. He and his wife have six grown children and twelve grandchildren. Bruce pastored Evangelical churches for twenty-five years in Ohio, Texas, and Michigan. Bruce left the ministry in 2005, and in 2008 he left Christianity. Bruce is now a humanist and an atheist. For more information about Bruce, please read the About page.

Thank you for reading this post. Please share your thoughts in the comment section. If you are a first-time commenter, please read the commenting policy before wowing readers with your words. All first-time comments are moderated. If you would like to contact Bruce directly, please use the contact form to do so.

Donations are always appreciated. Donations on a monthly basis can be made through Patreon. One-time donations can be made through PayPal.

print

Subscribe to the Daily Post Digest!

Sign up now and receive an email every day containing the new posts for that day.

I agree to have my personal information transfered to MailChimp ( more information )

I will never give away, trade or sell your email address. You can unsubscribe at any time.

Powered by Optin Forms

13 Comments

  1. Karen the rock whisperer

    I suspect most wives would disagree with me, but adultery is one thing that I would NOT see as automatically deserving of divorce. It definitely means trouble, and that might not be resolvable, and maybe divorce is ultimately necessary… but it depends a whole lot on the circumstances and how we both value our marriage.

    OTOH, if he abused me he’d never talk to me again without my divorce lawyer present, and if he was that kind of person we wouldn’t have made it past the first year, much less 35 years.

    Reply
    1. howitis

      I agree. It definitely depends on the couple, but adultery is not always a deal-breaker in a marriage. A college friend of mine married a pro hockey player, and she knew full well that he slept with other women on a regular basis, especially when he was on the road. But she put up with it because she loved him (he could be a very nice guy); because he was a great father to their kids; and because his salary allowed her to live a lifestyle (fancy houses in exclusive gated communities, fancy new cars every year, exotic vacations, private school for their kids, she didn’t have to work) that she would not have had otherwise. Basically, his infidelity was the price she paid to live in the lap of luxury, so all she asked of him was that he always use protection (to avoid the STDs and paternity suits she saw other players’ wives deal with) and that he keep his side affairs discreet and on the down-low. Last I heard, they are still together.

      On the other hand, it is possible to recover from an affair; I have a good friend who cheated on her husband early in their marriage, but rather than get a divorce when he found out, they decided to work on their relationship. They went to counseling for several months, and both agreed to make significant changes. He agreed to quit his job as a truck driver in favor of a career that would keep him home more; she agreed to move to another city and away from her meddling, high-drama parents. It wasn’t easy, but they saved their marriage, and they are happy and still together almost 30 years later.

      One thing that is an absolute deal-breaker to me: abuse. If your spouse lifts a hand to you, you leave. Period. Full Stop. Once an abuser, always an abuser, and he will not change, no matter what he says, 99.9 percent of the time. I have volunteered in a shelter for abused women and of the dozens of women who came through the doors, I can only think of one case where a man stopped abusing, and that was a guy whose real problem was his alcoholism; he only got violent when drunk and once he went through rehab (under threat of hard time in prison) and got sober, he stopped being abusive. In literally every other case, women who went back to their husbands got abused again. Many were abused even worse when they came back. And many were left permanently disabled, or dead.

      TL;DR: Abuse, not adultery, is the marriage deal-breaker. Thus the bible is wrong (as usual.)

      Reply
      1. Ahab

        Unfortunately, not all abuse victims have the option of leaving. Some victims stay with their abusers because of money, an insufficient support network, or life-threatening danger from the abusers if they leave.

        This is why it’s so important to have domestic violence services in our communities, and why we should support loved ones who are experiencing abuse. Those things can enable escape.

        Reply
      2. Lydia

        I’m fascinated by the story of your friend who tolerated her husband’s infidelities. Was she given the same freedom to have other partners? Do you think she was truly happy with the arrangement, or was she just tolerating it?

        Reply
        1. howitis

          I don’t know if she had the same freedom to sleep around; if she did, she didn’t talk about her affairs. What she did talk about, when someone asked her why she “put up with it,” was how much she loved him, and what a great Dad he was, and how much she loved their life together….which frankly I interpreted as “I love my affluent lifestyle as much (or more) than I love him, and I’ll lose that lifestyle if I leave him, so I will look the other way unless it becomes too humiliating.” She once told me that when she got engaged and became part of the players’ wives clique, she was told by one of the more “veteran” wives, basically: “Buy the ticket, take the ride. He will stray, and you need to decide right now if this life you get to have is worth that reality. If not, don’t get on this ride.”

          It’s a decision that, frankly, a lot of women who are married to pro athletes, actors, politicians, rock starts, etc. seem to make. I remember reading something around the time that Tiger Woods’ wife left him over his many indiscretions; someone wrote that she was the exception, not the rule, in that she decided to divorce him. Many, if not most, of the women whose prominent husbands get caught cheating seem to stay with their husbands and even defend them. Perhaps because they are just as addicted to the power, money and fame and the lifestyle it buys; perhaps because they love them and can’t imagine life without them; perhaps because they long ago realized (and accepted) that monogamy, while a great concept, is not for everyone, and negotiated an “open” relationship with their spouse, something that the larger society is loathe to accept. Perhaps it’s a little of all of the above; and perhaps, sadly, there are abuse dynamics at play in many of these relationships as well.

          Reply
  2. khughes1963

    Michael Pearl’s continued popularity is a mystery to me, especially given that his disciplinary techniques have contributed to the deaths of several children. Of course, Michael Pearl disclaims any legal or moral responsibility for it. As for domestic abuse in the IFB, Jack Hyles’s flagrant affair with Jennie Nischik and Jack Schaap’s sexual abuse of the teenaged girl that he was supposed to be counseling come to mind. So do the accounts of children from troubled homes being sent to the religious prisons like New Bethany and Hephzibah House.

    Reply
    1. Ahab

      I think Pearl’s teachings appeal to (1) sadists who seek absolute control over their children, or (2) people raised in authoritarian subcultures who have been brainwashed to see child physical abuse as normal.

      Reply
      1. khughes1963

        Sadly, I think you’re correct about that.

        Reply
  3. Kenneth

    I never really thought of how far some people take Christianity and I’m saddened to know this type of behavior could be seen as positive by IFB’s. I guess if you take the Bible literally, this type of thing could easily become very common anywhere and with any part of Christianity.

    Reply
    1. Bruce Gerencser (Post author)

      With any religion, as we see in Islam, Judaism, etal.

      Reply
  4. Steve

    I would need an encyclopedia to tell my story of life in the IFB

    Reply
  5. Chad Dionne

    GOD never says any of these things… but abusive religion does.

    HE is quite the opposite.

    Reply
    1. Michael Mock

      HE might want to consider stepping in and having a bit of a chat with some of his ostensible followers, then…

      Reply

Leave a Comment

You have to agree to the comment policy.