Ask one hundred Christians to define “True Christianity,” and you will end up with dozens of definitions. Put Church of Christ, Baptist, Pentecostal, Catholic, Eastern Orthodox, Reformed, and Apostolic preachers in the same room and ask them to define “True Christianity” and you will hear all sorts of explanations for what it means to be a “True Christian.” Each sect defines “True Christianity” differently. Who is right? How can we possibly know who is right? The aforementioned preachers each will appeal to the Bible and church history to justify their claim that they represent “True Christianity.” However, their interpretations widely differ from one another. They can’t all be right. Must one be baptized to be a Christian? Must one speak in tongues and be baptized to be a Christian? Is having faith all that matters, or must good works accompany faith? Is Calvinism or Arminianism “True Christianity?” How can any of us determine which sect, if any, represents, reflects, and teaches “True Christianity?”
I daily read many Evangelical blogs and websites. Rarely does a week go by without an Evangelical preacher opining on “True Christianity.” I have always found this odd since their target audience is people who are already “True Christians.” Why must the already saved be reminded of their status with God? Supposedly, the Holy Ghost lives inside of EVERY Christian. The Holy Spook is their teacher and guide, giving them everything they need for life and godliness. Or so says the Bible, anyway. Yet, Sunday after Sunday, Evangelical preachers stand before their congregations, reminding them of the requirements of “True Christianity.” Preachers repeatedly chastise congregants for not practicing what they believe are the basics of Christianity: daily Bible reading and prayer, regular church attendance, giving tithes and offerings, sharing your faith with unbelievers, and practicing the teachings of the Bible (as interpreted by your sect/church/pastor.) Most Evangelicals fail to follow and practice the basics of “True Christianity.” Does this mean that they aren’t “True Christians?” Some Evangelical talking heads will say, “Yes, Evangelical churches are filled with fake Christians; people who are posers, not possessors; people who have head knowledge and not heart knowledge of “True Christianity.”
I contend that these proponents of “True Christianity” — however they define it — preach a bastardized gospel that distorts what it means to be a true follower of Jesus. Right beliefs trump right behavior. Certain external behaviors such as those mentioned in the previous paragraph are valued far more than others in the Bible, such as helping the poor, sick, hungry, and dying. Could it be that Evangelicals have missed the mark and are preaching a gospel contrary to the teachings of Christ?
In Matthew 22:36-40, we find the Pharisees and Sadducees trying to trip up Jesus by asking him questions. One Pharisee, a lawyer, asked him: Master, which is the great commandment in the law? Jesus replied:
Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart, and with all thy soul, and with all thy mind. This is the first and great commandment. And the second is like unto it, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself. On these two commandments hang all the law and the prophets.
Jesus told those gathered to hear him that the entirety of the Old Testament hangs on two commandments:
- Loving God with all my heart, soul, and mind (or might)
- Loving my neighbor as myself
When was the last time you heard an Evangelical preacher sum up “True Christianity” by saying, “The True Christian loves God with all his heart, soul, and mind, and loves his neighbor as he loves himself?” I preached it during the latter years of my time in the ministry, but I can’t recall another Evangelical preacher emphasizing that these two commands are the sum, the essence of what it means to be a Christian.
I always reversed these commands, saying you don’t love God if you don’t love your fellow man. Think of how Evangelical zealots treat me and other unbelievers, thinking that atheists, agnostics, pagans, and other non-Christians aren’t their neighbors, so they don’t have to treat them with love, compassion, and kindness. Long-time readers of this blog know that some of the meanest, nastiest sons-of-bitches in all of Christendom are Evangelical Christians. “But, Bruce, atheists can treat Christians poorly too.” Yep, but just because they do doesn’t mean you get to treat them in kind. Jesus told his followers to love their enemies and turn the other cheek. When was the last time you felt “love” from an Evangelical Christian?
In Matthew 25 and other passages in the Bible, Christians are reminded that they are duty-bound to love their neighbors and care for the least of them. Most Evangelicals vote Republican and support Donald Trump, a party and presidential hopeful who despises people of color, immigrants, widows, orphans, and the marginalized of society. They vote for and enact policies and laws that show they don’t love their neighbors. According to Jesus’ own words, this means that they don’t love God.
Words are cheap. Jesus said, “Show me your faith. Show me what you really believe.” James reiterated this when he said, “Faith without works is dead.” Jesus told his followers that we show what we love by how we spend our money. Churches spend boatloads of money feeding the flock, choosing to make fat sheep fatter. How much money is actually spent on “loving your neighbor as yourself?” That’s a rhetorical question — but in reality, not much. And if you object to my broad characterization of Evangelicalism, please send me your church’s annual budget. The real budget; the one that lists the actual expenditures of the church. Most churches spend less than ten percent of their income on “the least of these.”
The next time an Evangelical tries to explain “True Christianity” to you, ask him about the two greatest commandments: love God, love your neighbor. He will likely hem and haw, saying “Who is my neighbor?” Or he might say that they show their “love” for their neighbor by evangelizing them.” Most likely, the Evangelical will ignore you, saying that unbelievers don’t know anything about the Bible.” How hard can it be to understand what Jesus is saying in Matthew 22? Even a third grader can understand that “True Christianity” is defined by love for God and love for your neighbor.
Bruce Gerencser, 66, lives in rural Northwest Ohio with his wife of 45 years. He and his wife have six grown children and thirteen grandchildren. Bruce pastored Evangelical churches for twenty-five years in Ohio, Texas, and Michigan. Bruce left the ministry in 2005, and in 2008 he left Christianity. Bruce is now a humanist and an atheist.
Connect with me on social media:
Your comments are welcome and appreciated. All first-time comments are moderated. Please read the commenting rules before commenting.
You can email Bruce via the Contact Form.
Any church that actually preached “love your neighbor as yourself” would probably lose followers anyway. People want to go to a church to be part of the team, and the stricter the church is, the more the church members look down on the “unsaved.”
Growing up, and reading the gospels, I concluded that loving God and loving neighbors was the essence of Christianity. And from that, it seemed to me that the disagreements between different denominations were not important in comparison.
But then I started to notice that while a few members of the church were practicing this, many were not. And this did not seem to concern the pastor. I began to wonder whether he saw tithing as the most important thing.
This mismatch between what I found in the gospels, and what I saw among people who claimed to be Christian, is why I eventually left Christianity.
The Holy Spook? I must remember that one. 😹 Seriously though, I have encountered many Christians who truly believe they show their “love” by trying to force others on the “correct” path. They are the God-appointed parents, sent to drive us foolish children from our evil ways. “If I didn’t care about you, I wouldn’t be trying to save you by introducing you to Jesus.” That’s their version of Christian love.
I learned ar a very young age, as a preachers kid, that Christians prefer to pay or pray instead of “doing.” People in my fathers churches would jump at a chance to help feed hungry people by contributing a bag full of non perishable food, or dropping an extra $10 in the offering plate, and for good measure made sure they prayed that god would “provide for those suffering and those in need”.
But they would scurry away quickly when asked to actually do anything. They didn’t want to actually interact with “those” people. “My gos, pastor, you want me to actually invite them in for a meal?? “ or “ well, yeah, I do have that empty apartment over my garage but I use it when people visit.”
Let’s be real, it is much easier to pray for forgiveness and live in faith than actually do anything. Faith lets you do all the things you normally do and doesn’t require those onerous “works”.
true christianity is a lunatic god that needs human blood sacrifice by torture, and this jesus to kill all non-christians, shortly thereafter to release its supposed archenemy to corrupt the christians who are left.
When I was an Evangelical Christian, “tough love “ was a mantra of American culture. Some of my fellow (at the time) Evangelicals saw their “Christian love” as a kind of “tough love.” So they believed that any action was justified if it was in the name of bringing someone to Jesus. It was OK to ignore someone’s actual needs because Evangelism was all that mattered; if people were desperate enough , they would come to Jesus. I also know of people who showed “God’s love” by destroying lives they deemed ungodly: they wrecked marriages (which weren’t “real” because they weren’t properly “Christian “ and got people fired from their jobs. Oh, and they never would soil their manicured hands by actually doing something to help people in need: Such people, they believed, needed to be cleansed of whatever “sin” brought them to their miserable state.
Don’t get me started on the priests, deacons and other church-affiliated people who conflated their lust with “God’s love.”
I suggest that preachers expound upon the nature of “True Christians” over and over, to folks already in their pews, merely to reinforce how special each and every one of his congregation is. This is why people go to church, to learn and have reinforced that they are special, and of course, all of those “others” are not.
Every Christian is convinced that their version of the true Christian is the right one. Whether this is arrogant or delusional I’m not sure but the common denominator is that none seem to feel the need to ask their invisible friend to clear up the confusion. I mean he’s omnipotent, right. Just show your face and make it clear once and for all. I guess for the sake of free will it’s more fair to sentence anyone who doesn’t guess right to eternal torture.
Wow Bruce, what can I say but “me too”. I’d take hours, or days, to summarize my thoughts on true Christianity if I could do it at all.
That “They can’t all be right” is what started my own skepticism. That logical clash plus the inequitability of penalizing “heathens” for their bad luck being born in non-Christian culture sent me down that slippery slope from which there’s no returning. One who is uncomfortable with unjust, arbitrary, illogical rules can’t consume that much nonsense. The blatant practice of avarice and outright greed by so many religious leaders impeaches their claims to following Christian teachings about love and charity. Religious leaders who manipulate their particular versions of Christianity to suit their purposes personify hypocrisy.
What is a “True Christian”? There’s so much info in the NT with conflicting messages, it’s hard to know. “True Christianity” seems to be whatever the individual or group or church says it is.
If I’m not mistaken, Jesus Himself answered the question of “Who is my neighbor”? Following the two greatest commandments- the answer was the parable of the Good Samaritan. The Jews of the time regarded Samaritans much the same way current Israelis regard Palestinians. We don’t know much about the man left beaten and naked on the road, but we know who walked by doing nothing- Jewish religious officials- they may have considered him “unclean”. Maybe it was the sabbath? Who knows. But the person who saved the victim was the lowest member of that society. Not only did he help financially he helped in deed- taking the man to an inn, paying all his expenses.
This is how you love your neighbor as yourself.
Of course some in the Protestant evangelical realm always warn that people like me advocate for a “works based salvation”. This is a convenient dodge for people who like all the glimmer of American style Christianity but don’t want to get dirty- I mean that metaphorically. Wrestling with your discomfort towards LGBT folks. Resisting the urge to hate and retaliate towards the angry activist who calls you every name in the book (when you’ve done nothing to earn that treatment, I should add). Taking food and clothing and maybe even money to the person standing on the interstate exit ramp, regardless of whether they deserve it.
Faith without works is dead.