The One Thing Necessary for Deconstruction

deconstruction chopping a tree

The word “deconstruction” is hotly debated these days, especially among Evangelical Christians. Rather than spend energy debating the meaning of the term, Let me explain how I colloquially use the word. Deconstruction is the process of stripping your beliefs bare and reinvestigating the claims that gave rise to these beliefs. The process is a lot like stripping the inside of a house and rebuilding it. This is exactly what I did two decades ago. Long before I embraced atheism, I decided to carefully, thoughtfully, and painfully reexamine my religious beliefs. The early seeds of this process were sown in the late 90s when my politics began to change, as did my beliefs about capitalism and war. I later embraced socialism and pacifism. In 2000, I voted for a Democrat the first time, and I have primarily voted Democrat ever since. As it happens for many former Evangelicals, my deconstruction found its impetus in evolving political beliefs.

I pastored my last church in 2003 and preached my last sermon in 2005. For several years I deconstructed my beliefs, stripping bare the central claims of Christianity. Starting with the inerrancy and infallibility of the Bible, I worked through the major doctrines of the Christian faith, concluding they could not be honestly and rationally sustained.

And that’s the word I want to focus on: honesty. There is only one thing required in the deconstruction process, and that is honesty. As you deconstruct your beliefs, be honest with your observations. I have counseled people countless times over the years about deconstruction. I typically yell them that honesty is key to the process. Meet truth in the middle of the road and do business with it. Don’t try to go around truth, jump over it, or return to where you came from. It’s okay to park in the middle of the road until you have thoroughly examined a particular belief (or practice). You don’t owe it to anyone to “move on.” When, and only when, your questions have been answered, then you can move on to examining another belief. This is what I did until I, with a broken heart — having invested fifty years in worshipping Jesus — admitted I no longer believe.

Deconstruction never leaves you as you are. Rarely do people honestly return to their old beliefs. Sadly, people often return to their old beliefs and practices out of fear or judgment or being ostracized. And I get it. When I deconverted, I lost a lifelong career, most of my friends, and all of my colleagues in the ministry. I didn’t lose everything — but almost. I paid a high price for truth, a price I would pay again today if called on to do so.

Most people who deconstruct end up in churches and religions that put a kinder, gentler face on faith. I don’t know of anyone who deconverted from Evangelicalism after deconstruction who then returned to Evangelical beliefs and practices afterward. I am sure they exist, I just don’t know of any. Some people end up embracing humanism, agnosticism, atheism, and other -isms. The common denominator is that they freely (I know, I know, free will doesn’t exist) chose to embrace different beliefs without conditioning and indoctrination. One of the hardest things for me to admit about my past Evangelical life is that I belonged to a blood cult, and after years of indoctrination and conditioning, I wholly embraced the cult’s deity and became a high priest.

Contrary to what Evangelicals will tell you, life is not all about the destination. The Evangelical house of cards is built on a foundation of a divine payoff after death for believing the right things. All that matters is making it to Heaven after death. I contend that life is all about the journey. Who knows where your journey will take you, but if you are honest throughout your journey, you will end up exactly where you need to be.

Bruce Gerencser, 69, lives in rural Northwest Ohio with his wife of 48 years. He and his wife have six grown children and thirteen grandchildren. Bruce pastored Evangelical churches for twenty-five years in Ohio, Texas, and Michigan. Bruce left the ministry in 2005, and in 2008 he left Christianity. Bruce is now a humanist and an atheist.

Your comments are welcome and appreciated. All first-time comments are moderated. Please read the commenting rules before commenting.

You can email Bruce via the Contact Form.

Comments

5 responses to “The One Thing Necessary for Deconstruction”

  1. Avatar
    GeoffT

    I agree entirely with this comment. Honesty. It’s the reason that Pascal’s Wager is such a poor option, as it forces you to try and lie to yourself. I’m not sure it’s possible for someone who embraces honesty ever to return to a state of delusion, which is what evangelicalism is. Once the penny has dropped there’s no going back, and the people who are in the state of delusion but claim once to have been atheists never experienced this confrontation with honesty. My view goes further and addresses all levels of religious belief, but here it gets tricky for me because I know many people I know are smarter than me who hold quite strong religious beliefs; but they don’t discuss their beliefs and, I’m sure, can sense within themselves that there’s a mental conflict. I asked one young lady, whom I’ve known since she was a baby and in fact knew because of my late first wife’s church connection, during a conversation where it was appropriate if she believed the Nativity story. She almost immediately said simply “yes” but I could see by the totally bemused look on her face that she’d never been forced into asking herself this very question. My conclusion was, and is, that she knew it wasn’t true but couldn’t admit it, even to herself.

    Incidentally, regarding your free will point, I defy anyone to be honest whilst at the same time trying to believe something they know isn’t true. I’m going to try and believe that the moon landings were faked…1,2,3…nope can’t do it. Does that mean I don’t have free will?

  2. Avatar
    John S.

    When I think back on my youth spent in the Assembly of God church, I find it interesting how much the yay-Jesus! evangelical and/or fundamentalist versions of Christianity look alot like Scientology, Amway, Facism and Marxism all rolled into one. Not the beliefs themselves, but the expectation of enthusiasm, the group-think, the re-education, the authoritarianism, the expectation to give your finances to the church so they can redistribute as they deem fit. The constant re-branding (the church of my youth no longer has “Assembly of God” in its name). The constant and shifting promise of the rapture being “right around the corner”.

    As most of you know, my ultimate path went from nothing, to Zen Buddhism to ultimately Catholicism. I’m not sure if this qualifies as “deconstruction”. I have experienced some of the same looks and questions that those raised in evangelical families experience when they openly announce their change of beliefs, but admittedly not nearly to the same degree.

    My thoughts on why people deconstruct is as much about just becoming tired of the emotional roller-coaster as much as trying to wrap their head around the insistence that they accept all the abstract demands of folks selling an invisible product. On the YouTube channel, “Cults to Consciousness”, the host calls these, “High Energy High Demand” religions. They are not constrained to evangelical Christianity. Mormonism, Islam, new age Eastern movements and yes Catholicism all have their groups that have this description. From my own experience, I guess a difference is that I can practice my religion somewhat anonymously as I am a social introvert, since I can attend mass at any Catholic Church. Most evangelical churches are more focused on keeping their congregants at that church and under the authority of the particular Pastor.

  3. Avatar
    dale m.

    Hi Bruce. I haven’t been on your site for a while. I’m busy setting up a podcast. Trying to slip my 1.6 million readers over so that I can monetize the site. The site is a Neo-Atheist site. Predominately a right-wing site with a socialist heart at its center. Probably more centrist in nature. That as it may, I realize that out of every 200,000 new podcasts created every year, 95% are dead within 3 months on average. And every successful site needs a zinger ! And the media must be out there in full force to cover it. It helps in the beginning to establish some notoriety. I happen to be a Nature boy in heart. Been in the field for many years. In scorching desert climes. In palaeontology. I also happened to notice small things in the deserts that weekend tourists never spot. My field excursions were often 4 months long. So I noticed a lot. I noted a lot of natural phenomena that many people would otherwise regard as “miracles” that matched those in the NT and OT. So. I made it a hobby to collect that data and perform these events in the field while enhancing these same events. There’s my key to launching a site with a lot of notoriety attached to it. I chose to demonstrate both NT and OT “miracles” and then teach the underlining physics to Joe and Jane Public so that they may understand and actually reproduce these same biblical miracles for themselves. My question to you … Is the power of these religious teachings predicated on the idea that prophets possess a special power directly from their God to perform these so called miracles so that those witnesses of those miracles may know that these prophets speak for that particular God ?!? If so, what do you suppose would be the effect on those followers if they were to witness an atheist perform them and teach them what was really behind these miracles ?!? In short, these miracles will be exposed simply as gross misinterpretations of natural phenomena performed by ancient magicians to make submissive followers.

  4. Hi Bruce! I shared this, emphasizing a key point of agreement. I don’t know if you saw my new book is out, Beyond Deconstruction: Building a More Expansive Faith. It reflects my own liberal Christian viewpoint, but it is not advocating that so much as advocating not merely defining oneself in terms of what one used to be. If you ever find the time to read it, I’d love to know what you think of it!

    1. Avatar

      Thanks, James. These days, it is unwise for me to make promises, but I did add your book to my Amazon list. I will read it if I can. You are one of my favorite liberal Christians. ❤️❤️

Want to Respond to Bruce? Fire Away! If You Are a First Time Commenter, Please Read the Comment Policy Located at the Top of the Page.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Discover more from The Life and Times of Bruce Gerencser

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading