Why Don’t Most Evangelicals Daily Read or Study the Bible?

preacher on bible reading

Evangelicals love to call themselves “people of the book.” The first church I worked for had an advertising sign that said, “The Blood, The Book, The Blessed Hope.” We believed, as Evangelicals do today, that the Bible was inerrant and infallible — without error and true in all it teaches. Yet, for all their talk about the Bible, most Evangelicals don’t read and study the Bible. Oh, they might read it from time to time, but as far as diligently reading and studying the Bible? No time for that, even though they demand unbelievers obey the Bible, not bothering to read it from cover to cover themselves. If this is not the case, why do Evangelical preachers repeatedly “encourage” congregants to read the Bible, warning them about what God will do to them if they don’t. Some pastors throw in the towel and try to at least get church members to read devotional materials such as “Our Daily Bread.” Every day, Christians read a couple of Bible verses and the devotional commentary for said verses, delusionally thinking that they are “studying” the Bible.

Evangelicals claim the Bible was written by God himself; that it is the most important book (actually collection of books) in human history. Supposedly, the Bible contains everything necessary for life and godliness. This supernatural book tells us how the universe was created and reveals to us the nature of God. Its pages reveal God’s redemptive plan for humanity (or the elect), along with how to have a successful marriage and a happy family. What a book of wisdom and knowledge, right? Yet, most Evangelicals never read the Bible through one time. What’s up with this disconnect? Why do Evangelicals demand the unwashed, uncircumcised Philistines of the world read the Bible when they, themselves, can’t bother to do it?

Here’s what I learned pastoring Evangelical churches for twenty-five years:

First, most Evangelicals want to do what is “right.” They want to read and study the Bible, pleasing both God and the maniac who chastises them every week from the pulpit for not being the bestest (and the most giving and obedient) Christians ever.

Second, life often gets in the way of obey God. Sorry, but that’s just how it is. I was about ten years into my ministerial career before I finally figured out what was going on. Most of the people I pastored were kind, loving, thoughtful people. Sure, I pastored more than a few assholes, but most congregants loved God, loved the church, loved the Bible, and loved me as their preacher. They wanted to read and study the Bible, but after working 40-60 hours a week and taking care of domestic obligations, no time was left for them to devote themselves to the Word of God. Did this make them bad Christians? Of course not. They were tired Christians, not backslidden as I alleged. I was paid to read, study, and preach the Bible. I can’t remember a day as a pastor that I didn’t read the Bible. It was, after all, the most important book in my life. I wanted the Bible to be the most important book in the lives of congregants too, but there were not enough hours in the day for them to do so.

Polly spent much of her life as a pastor’s wife feeling guilty over her lack of Bible reading, study, and prayer. It didn’t help the matter that her preacher husband kept reminding her to be a “good example.” Eventually, I stopped badgering Polly, realizing that she, too, only had so much time to devote to the Bible every day. She wanted to read and study the Bible as her preacher husband did, but after raising six kids in a 12×60 foot trailer, cooking meals for them, washing loads of shitty cloth diapers every day, doing ALL the domestic chores (because her soulwinning husband was rarely home), entertaining church members almost every weekend, being her husband’s secretary (she was happy when computers delivered her from this task), and happily putting out when her husband asked, there was no time left for Bible reading.

For five years, both Polly and I taught in our church’s private school. Polly taught church children how to read, spell, and do basic grammar. Our younger students have fond memories of Miss Polly putting them on her lap and helping them read. These same students have different memories of the man they called “Preacher.” I not only taught in the school, I was the principal. Remember, we were Independent Fundamentalist Baptists, at the time. I was the school disciplinarian. No one wanted to be sent to my office.

Based on what I have already shared, when, exactly, did my partner have time to give anything more than a passing glance at the pages of the Bible? Did this make her a bad Christian? Of course not, even though she felt guilty for not being a sold-out follower of Jesus. Six kids, loads of poopy diapers, cooking countless meals, caring for a 720 square foot hillbilly mansion, and devotedly loving a demanding, driven husband dominated her waking hours. Both of us spent years only getting five to seven hours of sleep a night. In retrospect, it’s a wonder either of us made it out alive.

As a pastor, I came to understand that the only Bible knowledge most church members had was what they gained from my sermons three times a week. I accepted that no amount of preaching was going to add more hours in their days. No amount of cajoling Polly was going to make her devote time she didn’t have to leisurely reading the Bible. I eventually stopped nagging people about reading and studying the Bible. I figured if God wanted them to read more of the Bible he could tell them himself. Overnight, preacher and congregants alike took a sigh of relief, leaving the matter to God.

How often did you read the Bible? Did you feel guilty over not reading the Bible as you felt you should (or as your pastor felt you should)? Did you read the Bible from cover-to-cover? Please share your experiences in the comment section.

Bruce Gerencser, 69, lives in rural Northwest Ohio with his wife of 48 years. He and his wife have six grown children and thirteen grandchildren. Bruce pastored Evangelical churches for twenty-five years in Ohio, Texas, and Michigan. Bruce left the ministry in 2005, and in 2008 he left Christianity. Bruce is now a humanist and an atheist.

Your comments are welcome and appreciated. All first-time comments are moderated. Please read the commenting rules before commenting.

You can email Bruce via the Contact Form.

Comments

27 responses to “Why Don’t Most Evangelicals Daily Read or Study the Bible?”

  1. Yes, I did do some Bible reading every day. That was before I de-converted.

    While I use the expression “the word of God”, I took that to be metaphor. It seemed pretty obvious that the Bible had human authors. And it seemed clear that it wasn’t inerrant, though I did take it to be inerrant on theological questions.

    I’ll note that many people do not like reading. They may prefer an audio book to a print book. Personally, I was an avid reader, and have never tried an audio book. But we are all different with different preferences.

  2. Avatar
    GeoffT

    I’ve never understood the idea of reading the bible ‘cover to cover’. I always thought, even at a very young age, that the bible was more of a reference book, rather like an encyclopaedia (though without an index) that one accessed according to the need or to the occasion. I still couldn’t conceive myself, no matter how devout, being able to plough through it as though it were a novel.

  3. Most of the evangelicals I have known just depended on the pastor of the month to read it, interpret it, and tell them what to do. Who to hate, who to turn your back on, it’s all in there.

    My own parents were like that, too.
    “Well PASTOR says ____ ”
    Fill in the blank with racist/bigot/straight up be an asshole stuff that spewed from whatever pastor they were currently parroting.

    Neither one of them ever learned to think for themselves. Easier to let ‘pastor’ do it for them and make us do it, too.

    I did try reading it. Boring. Long winded. And did I mention boring and long winded? Also full of crap.

  4. Avatar
    matilddaa

    Secretly I struggled for years to maintain the habit of daily bible reading – and I was told it was absolutely essential for commiting each day to god. I tried hard, I used ‘Daily Bread’ and later other online daily helps but never truly cracked it. Hubby never found it a problem, he did it happily and a friend said she loved to get up at 5 am to ‘spend time with the lord’, before waking and caring for her very disabled child at 6am. I was also told I needed to have my daily devotions in the morning as doing them in the evening – which would have been far preferable to me – was giving god only ‘the fag* end of the day’. As my faith diminuished, I faced the fact that the days I missed reading a bible portion in my hum-drum everyday life, were no different from the days I managed to do a reading and manufacture thoughts that god was really speaking to me and was orchestrating every single thing that happened to me in it. Even if it was just staying home, doing the laundry, the chores and changing baby’s nappies or weeding the garden!
    *fag=cigarette butt to us brits in case it means something naughty to the likes of SEVM.

  5. Avatar
    John S.

    Growing up in the Assembly of God Church during the 1980’s, I participated in Royal Rangers (basically Pentecostal Boy Scouts). While the emphasis was on camping and wearing the uniform properly, we were also given awards for reading the Bible, something I completed as a teenager. I just remember how often the Israelites would “again anger the Lord” in the Old Testament. I would always ask myself “why?”. I will say I found the New Testament alot easier to read, since at the time I was also fascinated by the Roman Empire. I also liked the Book of Ecclesiastes for some odd reason. I also found it interesting how the adults all had their fancy leather zip up Bible covers, which they would bring to church with them. That’s something I don’t really see in the Catholic Church. There are missals available and some older folks might use these during mass, but most including myself really just listen to whatever is being said, without a lot of reading along.

    After I left evangelism (as an adult), I really didn’t read the Bible much- maybe a Gideons in a motel room. The only religious text I read consistently before I became Catholic in 2018 was The Dhammapada (reportedly the early proverbs of the Buddha).

    Now I usually will read the liturgical daily readings. There is also a Catholic version of “Our Daily Bread” that I read, but it doesn’t have a lot of actual Biblical quotes. And on occasion I will still check out the Dhammapada.

  6. i never even tried to read the bible until i was in my last year of high school. when i read it for the first time, i couldn’t possibly imagine where these “evangelicals” were getting the drivel that they forced on people, so i joined a seminary, because i figured that if i knew the bible better, i might be able to talk with these folks and maybe even win an argument with them.

    by the time i was approaching graduation from the seminary, i had read the bible cover to cover, many times, but i still hadn’t won any arguments, and i had only dramatically confused the people with whom i was arguing… i had also gained a great deal of skepticism concerning the claims that the bible was inerrant and infallible. on the advice of the headmaster of the seminary, i started reading scriptures from other religions. i read, from cover to cover, the qur’an, tao te ching, the zend avesta, the gathas of zarathustra, the vedas, many upanishads (there are thousands), many writings of the buddha, and some more obscure things such as a course in miracles, the holy piby, the kebra negast, the boo-hoo bible, the book of the subgenius, principia discordia, and the nuclear platypus biscuit bible… they ALL made approximately the same amount of sense: there were pearls of wisdom and outright bullshit in every one, without exception.

    at that point, i graduated from the seminary, and, three days later, i converted to hinduism, because i could relate better with the concepts i found there.

    and at this point, i have given up on arguing with “christians”, because, as thomas paine said, to argue with a person who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead.

  7. Avatar
    Jeff Bishop

    Never read the Holy Bible cover to cover.
    I made three major attempts – first two, made in through the New Testament only to fall short in the Old Testament.
    Third time – Didn’t finish the New Testament.

    Reading it every day? Made some rather weak attempts a few times, never lasted more than a couple of weeks.

    The bible is not an easy read. Especially the Old Testament. The King James Version? LOL forget about it.

    Bruce, I do appreciate you bringing up the fallacy of people actually knowing, much less understanding the “Books of the Bible” much less the totality of it’s meaning.

    I am afraid, even as youngster, I suspected it being figurative or symbolic rather than literal.

    As an avowed atheist, one is lured into a trap by persons that do have a decent command of the material, by being machine gunned with biblical “quips / versus”, and having difficulty responding in an intelligent manner. I pretty much avoided such confrontations. My standard reply being when cornered, , “The 4 gospels are not even consistent with each other”, end of conversation.

    Having gotten older it is very nice to ride on the shoulders of others whom have immersed themselves in the minutia
    of the bible, from a secular point of view, and have provided answers to many questions. My particular favorite, being Bart Ehrman. Professor Ehrman (among others) have eliminated any doubts I have, as an atheist, regarding the “accuracy / historicity” of the collection of books that make up the bible. Then of course their are the many scientific disciplines themselves, archeology, biology, genetics, geology, paleontology and astronomy, among others, that annihilate most biblical narratives, as being anything close to factual.

  8. Avatar
    CJ

    Bruce ,
    How many times have you read the Bible through?

    1. Avatar

      At least ten times, with reading the New Testament, Psalms, Proverbs, Ecclesiastes more often, and the rest of the Old Testament less often.

  9. Avatar
    JT

    I think pastors should be careful about advising their congregation to read the Bible more… Reason? Because it could generate a lot of tough questions for said pastors. Take me for an example. About a year or two ago when I got tired of seeing how churches do things and felt that something wasn’t right, I took it upon myself to read the Bible, but with a set of blinders on, meaning that I was going to read it for what it said rather than what I was taught. Whoa, what a journey I’ve been on since then.

    Through that experience, coupled with some other events (one being coming across this site), reading alternative sources (like Bart Ehrman), and numerous “rabbit holes”, my view of the Bible has changed. There are inconsistencies, things that don’t make sense, conflicting accounts that can’t both be correct, etc… Not to mention the fact that we can’t even prove the books of the Bible were written by the author associated with them… And I realize the readers of this site are well aware of this, but most Christians will never do what I did and actually read what it says rather than what they are taught… If they did, more pastors would be squirming to come of with “spiritual gymnastics” to explain it away.

  10. Avatar
    Environmental Scientist

    Have you written about your time running this “school” and your reflections on it? Have you read about the controversy with Judge Judy and Cornerstone Christian School?

    I can take a few guesses at what “I was the school disciplinarian. No one wanted to be sent to my office.” means. I’m curious, now that years have passed and you’ve left Christianity have you reached out to these former students and apologized?

    1. Avatar

      Environmental Scientist: “[…] have you reached out to these former students and apologized?”

      Zoe: Ugh. Heaviness. Sigh.

      I remember coming across Bruce’s blog ages ago. Maybe the dinosaurs were still roaming the earth back then? It was a post where he apologized. I cannot recall the specifics, but it was the first time I had ever heard, whether in person or online or in a book, a pastor apologize.

      To date, he’s the only one.

      I don’t know but I sense that in a way, Bruce’s writing is his attempt to apologize. The weight of sorrow that accompanies decisions made during our former believing days, is ever present. I wish the inventors of Christianity would apologize to me. I wish my ancestors had apologized to me. I am thankful that in my generation, I broke the cycle. Maybe breaking the cycle is our apology. <3

      1. Avatar
        Environmental Scientist

        “Maybe breaking the cycle is our apology. <3”

        No, only an apology is an apology. Anything else is a cop out.

        1. Avatar
          John S.

          I believe I have read past posts where Bruce talked about making amends to former parishioners whom he may have caused distress to.

          I understand the importance of trying to make amends. But I also agree with the 12 step idea regarding this- we try to make amends unless it is not feasible or more importantly it will most likely only cause more distress to the effected person.

          I say this as both someone who has felt the need to apologize and as someone who felt an apology of sorts was owed. Sometimes I was able to make things right, sometimes not. Also, there is a fine line between a self serving “apology” that just alleviates your own guilt and one that is heartfelt and brings healing to both you and the other person.

          Also, sometimes hurt people don’t want an apology, they want a confession and justice. Sometimes that’s what’s called for, like a SAer of children. No “apology” is going to mitigate the need for justice. In these situations, I have more respect for the person who just admits their guilt and accepts their punishment.

          But in most cases context matters. Corporal punishment, for example, was common when Bruce was an educator. People were different. Yes, it is good to acknowledge the hurt that was done and express regret and remorse. If the person is sincere accept it and move on. If you can’t accept the apology then tell the person. Sometimes just bringing the matter up from the long past causes emotional distress. If that’s the case, then state your peace and let it be. Continuing the conversation so you can officially “apologize” only serves to alleviate your own sense of guilt. It does nothing to help the other person.

          So this is a long way of saying Zoe is correct, IMHO. We make our amends the best way we can. Sometimes it is by apologizing, sometimes it is by letting the past go and resolving to do better.

          1. Avatar
            Environmental Scientist

            Bruce has shown he’s a man capable of Google and writing. I merely asked if he reached out to students who were on the receiving end of what you assume was corporal punishment. It doesn’t hurt to try. Best case, a wound is amended. Worse Bruce gets an upset reply.

            Maybe he has reached out, There aren’t many former heads of private religious “schools” who have both left the religion and are taking questions so I’ll take any change to inquire about their lives which I can get.

        2. Avatar

          Even Jesus couldn’t save everyone Environmental Scientist. Father God tried to but ended up drowning almost everyone. A rainbow is hardly an apology. Oh look at the pretty rainbow. Look away from the devastation and drowning babies as they float by. Maybe a shiny multi-coloured arch in the sky is a cop out.

          Spare the rod, spoil the child. How many generations of rods were given out? At any point in time, did the Lord step forward and say, no more? Did James Dobson, the supposed Lord’s faithful servant ever step up before he died and say, I got it wrong and so did God?

          Eventually it seems He got around to it in Ephesians. Fathers, do not provoke your children to wrath. Is that when all of a sudden the evangelicals stopped rodding their children? I cannot think of a more chaotic time in the church. Parents disciplining their children because God says so (rod) and other Christians speaking up and saying, no. Jesus loves. There is a better way.

          How many apologies is enough Environmental Scientist? Even Jesus got in a boat to get away from the crowd. Do you want Bruce to get some air time on Fox News to apologize? Do you want him to dig-up records from ages ago and call everyone to apologize? If he can only locate 2 of his students but maybe he should apologize to at least 5, has he failed if he can’t reach them? Does this qualify as a cop-out?

          I suspect you have set the bar higher for Bruce than God Himself.

          1. Avatar
            Environmental Scientist

            I asked Bruce if he reached out to the students and apologized. If the stories I’ve heard of religious schools are anything like what Bruce and Polly were running he should apologize to each student.

            You’re getting incredibly defense. Bruce hasn’t even confirmed or denied what he did or didn’t do. Any child subjected to corporal punishment (if indeed that’s what occurred) should get a personalized apology.

          2. Avatar

            If every student that received corporal punishment in school should get an apology, I know a few teachers who are still living that owe me one.

            I think you are operating on a false assumption about Christian schools in general, and our school, in particular.

            That said, I plan to write a post on this subject. Stay tuned.

      2. Avatar

        Thanks! ❤️❤️ I’ll address this issue further, soon. I have designated you patient zero—the first reader/commenter on the first iteration of this blog. Andrew Hackman would also fit in this category.

        Your words accurately reflect my approach to the past. I’m open and honest. That, of course, will never be enough for some folk. Every student in our school knows about this blog. Several have commented. I’m on good terms with some of them; others I haven’t talked to in almost 35 years. Polly’s Facebook friends with some of our former students. Most of the students we’ve talked to/had dinner with/etc understand as we do that we all experienced a moment in time deeply affected by Fundamentalist Baptist theology, political beliefs, geographical influences (Appalachia), family dynamics, poverty (all students came poor families) and cultural expectations. This is an educated way of saying “it was what it was.”

        You are right, “this blog is an apology, of sorts.” I also call it penance.

        This is no reflection on EV, but I long ago realized people have certain pictures of a fundamentalist preacher in their minds. As you know, preachers come in all shapes, sizes, and personalities. Sure, I was a hellfire and brimstone preacher, but I also was a loving, kind, compassionate man. Temperamental? Sure. But caring too. We are all mixed bags. The perfect Christian I was not, and I’m certainly not perfect today.

        Thanks for being along for the ride. ❤️❤️

        1. Avatar

          I was thinking of the word atonement. Penance works too. 🙂

          I found myself reflecting, rather than defensive as Environmental Scientist sees it.

          Thinking on the scale of generational truth. Memories. And the weight of it all.

        2. Avatar
          Environmental Scientist

          That’s great to know, thank you for answering my question. Apologizing is very difficult for Americans. I can see you and your readers have a lot of strong feelings about it. I wish it weren’t so and more of us could admit when we messed up. Those who had formerly been in positions of power especially.

          As to the other reply which is locked, no Bruce I know a lot about private “schools” and why they fight so hard to avoid the prying eyes of the DOE (during the years before Trump came into office, at least Bush and Reagan pretended to care). I hope you were the exception, many of them give students next to know knowledge of how to further their education, function as a member of society outside of their church, or even make it through the world in a vocation.

          I wish that clip of the Judge Judy show were still available online. The principal indignantly told her he’d graduated high school when she asked his qualifications. She ripped him a new one and explained the importance of public education and standards of educators much better than I could have. I’m sure you know how much Christian men love being put in their place by women who aren’t Christians, it was lovely to watch. Given that she ruled against them and the school closed shortly after it may have even belonged in your Black Collar Crime series, if you allow civil suits.

          1. Avatar

            You are making sweeping judgments about what I may or may not have done in the past, for which you have no evidence. You assume the academics were inferior. Again, how could you know this?

            Apologizing is hard for all of us. Again, you make a sweeping generalization about Americans. Who wants to be wrong? I know I don’t, but when I am I do what I can to make things right and make, if necessary, restitution.

          2. Avatar
            John S.

            I think most folks don’t have a problem apologizing if they feel they were wrong. Unfortunately I think two people who experienced the same incident will often have two entirely different perspectives, depending on. “Where” they came from (generation, culture, religion or non-religion, education level, etc.)as well as the part they played in said incident.
            So one person thinks an apology is in order, the other does not and pushes back because their accuser didn’t have to “walk in their shoes”. They may also come from a time and place where just uttering an apology to make someone feel better wasn’t considered “genuine”.
            I have really come to like the word “reconciliation” for what Environmental Scientist, Zoe and. Bruce are talking about. I think at the end of the day we are all trying to journey to the same place in this life- peace and tranquility. The chief stumbling blocks on this path are fear, regret, resentment and hatred among other negative emotions. Whatever is done to make amends should have the goal of bringing peace to both parties, whether that is an apology and/or maintaining a webpage that gives others a good place to both read and write about similar experiences.

  11. Avatar
    Karuna Gal

    Lay Roman Catholics didn’t read the whole Bible when I was growing up. They didn’t even study a book or two. It wasn’t encouraged at all. They relied on the “Magisterium,” the teaching of the Church and their bored parish priest’s short and desultory homilies (Catholic sermons) on Sundays and at other times. During Mass, laypeople would read aloud a little excerpt from elsewhere in the New Testament while the priest would read the Gospel. That was pretty much it, although the Eucharist part did include the Last Supper narrative.
    As an adult non believer I read the Bible entirely and was appalled by the misogyny, violence and cruelty in a lot of it. There were long, boring passages, some poetry, some great stories (always loved the story of Saul), some wisdom here and there. But it’s a hodgepodge, really.

  12. I grew up as a Roman Catholic. We were discouraged from reading the Bible. I didn’t start until I became an evangelical Christian. I did indeed read it cover-to-cover at least twice. But I think the majority of my Bible reading consisted of looking at particular books, or merely chapters and verses, to try and figure out how to make myself right with Jesus—or simply convince people (including myself) that I was trying to do any such thing.

    A few years before I stopped believing, I confessed to another member of my church that I found “some of it” boring. “Especially Numbers and Deuteronomy,” I said. She laughed. “It’s not always the most exciting. But, you know, sometimes life is boring, “ she explained.

    John—I have to admit I still have a bit of a soft spot for Ecclesiastes. There is some real wisdom in it, and the language, even in the translations I’ve read, is clear, even elegant in its simplicity. (I used to like Psalms, but the language I thought was beautiful now seems over-wrought. Maybe it has to do with the translations.) Ironically, some of Ecclesiastes sounds as if it could have been written by Existentialists

    1. Avatar
      John S.

      Thanks, MJ. Ecclesiastes strikes me as the reflections of someone (Solomon I think) who pondered how he got himself into the mess he was in. It is very existential, and at least to me describes how people change over time and experience, including their perception of themselves.
      The language of Psalms is beautiful but it is difficult for me to get any profound meaning out of them. The language of Ecclesiastes is alot more relatable to me personally.

  13. As a child, I was never encouraged to read the Bible. I had a children’s Bible, but of course the most adult stories were left out (except for the horrible pictures of people and animals dying in the flood). As an adult, I read the Bible cover to cover once. Took me a year. I don’t plan to do that again.

    I am currently reading the Robert Crumb book where he illustrates the entire Book of Genesis. It certainly is more interesting seeing the stories of Lot and Onan complete with full frontal nudity.

Want to Respond to Bruce? Fire Away! If You Are a First Time Commenter, Please Read the Comment Policy Located at the Top of the Page.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Discover more from The Life and Times of Bruce Gerencser

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading