Dr. David Tee Says Human Culture Played No Role in Writing the Bible

dr david tee

Dr. David Tee, whose real name is Derrick Thomas Thiessen, recently wrote the following about the nature and construction of the Bible. Thiessen denies human culture had anything to do with the writing of the Bible. He even goes so far as to say that “The Bible’s content is from God’s culture, not a Jewish one.”

Thiessen says he has Bible college education (and a doctorate), yet his writing reveals beliefs that bear little resemblance to Christian orthodoxy. That’s fine, Thiessen can believe whatever he wants, and college educated people can and do believe stupid things. However, Thiessen would be hard pressed to find any of his professors who would agree with what he has written here, or any of his ministerial colleagues who would say, “Fine work, Dr. Tee.”

I have a lot of Evangelical readers, including preachers. Drop a note in the comment section detailing what you think about Thiessen’s claims. Can you square them with the Bible?

Here’s an excerpt from Thiessen’s post, The Common Mistake Many People Make:

This question is related to what our professor said in class one day: ‘You have to understand the culture of that time’ when referring to how the Bible was written. There are two related answers to that question.

The first answer would be that no human culture shaped the Bible. The second answer explains why that is so. The second answer is that God’s culture shaped the biblical content. The Bible is a divinely written book transmitted through inspired authors who happen to be human.

There was no human culture involved in the writing of the Bible. Every word came from God and his culture and what he wanted humans to become. Human culture cannot create instructions enabling and helping other humans to become holy.

….

The Bible is not part of Jewish literature. It is part of God’s literature written to provide humans with God’s holy culture so that all people would know how to live in the kingdom of God.

….

There is no human culture involved in the writing of the bible. Every word recorded reveals God and what he wants his people to do and live. The Bible is God’s literature whose content reveals what God wants us to know.

….

The style of biblical writing does not change or influence the message. The style is just the style that is used to communicate important information. Many scholars, etc., feel that the style of writing changes the message, but it does not.

….

The message transcends the style of writing, keeping the Bible a book from a divine culture and not a human one. Once Christians understand this, living the Christian life becomes much easier and less confusing.

Christians know exactly what they are to do and what God wants them to do. This divine culture origin ensures that everyone throughout history has the will of God at their fingertips. They can also avoid the trap this common mistake leads them to.

….

The Bible’s content is from God’s culture, not a Jewish one. One could say that if the Jews correctly followed the Bible, they would be living God’s culture, not a Jewish one. The same goes for the NT.

….

The NT was not created out of a Jewish culture. It was created out of God’s holy culture.

— end of excerpt —

I have read a lot of theology in my almost 70 years of life, but I’ve never read the above before. How do you answer someone who says “no human culture — including Judaism — wrote the Bible? I can’t think of any way to square this with what we know about the nature and history of the Bible.

I had rules that governed my study of the Bible. If I found myself coming to a conclusion that was not supported by experts in the Biblical text, my interpretation was likely wrong. If Thiessen followed this rule, what would experts be telling him? Of course, he has the Holy Ghost on his side, so he has no need to listen to experts.

Comments

15 responses to “Dr. David Tee Says Human Culture Played No Role in Writing the Bible”

  1. Nurse! He’s out of bed again!

    The line that jumped out at me was ‘inspired authors who happen to be human’. As opposed to what? Hyenas? Praying mantis?

    Dr Tee Pot seems to think if he repeats an assertion often enough – ‘not Jewish culture but God’s culture’ – that that repetition somehow makes it true. A Bible scholar he is not.

    1. Avatar

      Have you ever heard that line of “thinking” before? I haven’t; not one time. Never heard it in church, college, or pastor’s conferences.

      I thought I had heard everything from Evangelicals, but this is a new 🆕 one for me.

      1. While I’ve not heard this particular batshittery before, it’s very much the ‘infallible, inerrant word’ claim taken to an insupportable extreme.

        Hasn’t the old Tee-Leaf previously excused less palatable parts of the Bible as being ‘culturally bound’? If not him, then certain of his marginally more intelligent brethren (it’s a very low bar). His current assertion – let’s not grant that it’s an argument – voids that excuse in one fell swoop. The man’s a blithering eejit.

  2. Even John R. Rice would have disagreed with Dr Tee. Rice argued that the words were what the authors wanted to write from their perspective, and yet what came out was still the infallible Word of God. He would have acknowledged that we see the individual perspectives and backgrounds of the authors in the words.

  3. Avatar
    Carol Kelley

    Rabbi Tovia singer (and many other Jews) who would say if Christians ever really read the prophets then they would realize that Jesus is not the Messiah.

  4. Avatar
    Linn

    The whole point of many of the Scriptures is to preserve the monotheistic culture of the Jews. They are not to be like the polytheistic nations around them. Then, there is the culture shock of the New Testament when the Jewish believers need to realize that they are no longer under law but grace. Read Galatians for a fine explanation of that. (not a preacher, but 15 years a cross-cultural missionary doing Christian Ed who currently belongs to a Spanish-speaking church).

  5. Avatar

    I recommend Bart Ehrman – and the real truth he exposes about Biblical Scripture. Who wrote it, the earliest manuscripts and the thousands (Hundreds of Thousands) of discrepancies in the texts.

    Funny how the almighty Evangelical Christian God, who created a Universe with two trillion galaxies, if not more, can’t even make sure that original “God” documents are mistake free, consistent with each other (see Matthew, Mark, Luke and John) who’s stories are not in agreement, and so on and so forth.

    This is why many scholars refer to Christianity as a religious cult, like every other one that ever existed.

  6. Avatar

    Bruce: ” […] so he has no need to listen to experts.”

    Zoe: I wonder if he has even one other person who agrees with him? Or, is he the only expert besides “God” of course?

    He reminds me of my time in the cult.

  7. Avatar
    Greg T

    Grifter. Not sure how long this guy’s been in business, but he sure is hoping that his readers
    know as little about manuscripts and archaeology as flat-earthers know about science. This idea is a whopper, I’ll give him that.

    At the same time, he certainly has picked the right audience.

    1. Avatar

      He’s a 70+ years old Evangelical preacher, currently domiciled in the Philippines. He graduated from a Bible college in Canada, and he allegedly has a master’s degree and a doctorate. I say allegedly because he refuses to divulge where he “earned” them. I have my suspicions, but no solid evidence. He says, “God knows where he earned them, and that’s all that matters.”

      His latest pronouncements baffle me. I thought I had heard everything, but this “whopper” as you say, is a new one.

  8. Avatar
    GeoffT

    I don’t even know what Tee means by his culture of god speculation. If the bible hadn’t been written in the culture of the time then people would not have been able to understand it. In fact, this is precisely why we know the bible is entirely the product of mankind, because had it been the ‘culture’ of god then there might have been some insights that could not have been provided by people of the time.

  9. To argue with a person who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead.
    — Thomas Paine

  10. Avatar

    Thiessen responded. 😜 Make of it what you will. Here’s a summary: Bruce Gerencser is an unbeliever who knows nothing about the Bible. Therefore I am right! Keep believing that, buddy. 😜

    https://theologyarchaeology.wordpress.com/2026/08/12/a-negative-response/

  11. Avatar
    John S.

    Wow so-called “Dr.” Tee lays it on thick in his response to you. He “knows” the truth unlike a whole lot of other scholars both religious and non-religious.
    His doublespeak would almost be comical if it wasn’t for the very concerning fact that he actually has followers who believe what he says. I’m afraid someday we’re going to read about his cult ending tragically when a comet flies by or something like that.

  12. Isn’t “God’s culture “ an oxymoron?

Want to Respond to Bruce? Fire Away! If You Are a First Time Commenter, Please Read the Comment Policy Located at the Top of the Page.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Discover more from The Life and Times of Bruce Gerencser

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading