Why Bruce Gerencser Really Became an Atheist According to Shepherds Theological Seminary

atheist immorality

An unattributed author at Shepherds Theological Seminary, in Cary, North Carolina, wrote an article titled Responding Biblically to Atheism, detailing why people like me become atheists:

The fool’s decision to say in his heart that there is no God, then, is an act of the will, not the intellect. Derek Kidner states, “The assertion, There is no God, is in fact treated in Scripture not as a sincere if misguided conviction, but as an irresponsible gesture of defiance.” Fools say there is no God because “they are corrupt” (Ps. 14:1).

This is a critical point with regard to atheism. Atheism is a moral choice of the will. James Spiegel states it well: “Atheism is not at all a consequence of intellectual doubt. Such doubts are mere symptoms of the root cause—moral rebellion. For the atheist, the missing ingredient is not evidence but obedience.”

….

The presence of this general revelation of God in His creation explains why there is no reasoned, philosophical refutation of atheism in Scripture. The evidence is such that unbelief is inexcusable. Indeed, only a fool would reject this evidence.

….

As Spiegel explains, “The ‘wickedness’ of the unbeliever works to ‘suppress’ what is manifest in nature.

….

Every person is a created being who lives in a divinely created world, and that creation—both physical and in terms of the imago dei—makes it abundantly clear that a Creator exists. To reject the existence of God is to suppress the truth that is inherently known by every person as created in God’s image.

….

Atheism is not the result of objective assessment of evidence, but of stubborn disobedience; it does not arise from the careful application of reason but from willful rebellion. Atheism is the suppression of truth by wickedness, the cognitive consequence of immorality. In short, it is sin that is the mother of unbelief.

Atheism is a denial of what atheists—and all persons—know is true. It is essentially an attempt at self-deception. Some, no doubt, have been more successful than others at deceiving themselves, but this is the biblical assessment of their atheism.

What are we to make, then, of the many philosophical, psychological, scientific, and historical arguments atheists consistently present to back their assertion that there is no God? The biblical perspective would suggest that the “skeptical objections are the atheists’ façade, a scholarly veneer masking the real causes of their unbelief—causes that are moral and psychological in nature.”17

So, here is the path to atheism. A person engages in immorality of one sort or another. He realizes by way of conscience or exposure to biblical truth that such conduct is morally wrong and an offense to the true God.

When confronted with the revelation of God in Jesus Christ and his written Word, a sinner can fall before God in repentance and faith or remain unrepentant and continue in rebellion against the Creator. The atheist not only has chosen the latter but also has chosen to justify his choice by proclaiming that God does not exist.

The intellectual arguments denying God’s existence, then, are simply the justification for the moral choice to reject God and live free of moral restraints. E. Michael Jones says it succinctly:

“Those who commit evil will be troubled by its pangs, and in their trouble they have only two alternatives: they can either conform their actions to the moral law or conform the moral law to their actions. The former case calls for repentance, the latter rationalization.”

But is this pattern stated too simplistically? After all, can we really point in every case to some particular immoral act that led the atheist to rejection of God? In other words, does the Bible’s description match reality? First, there may not be any one specific moral failure that leads a person to atheism. It could be an accumulation of failures or simply a growing desire to be free to live immorally or at least without the restraints, disapproval, and threatened judgment of a living, holy God. Such thoughts and desires, of course, cannot be easily detected, but they are still immoral.

Second, while most atheists present their decision to reject belief in God in terms of intellect and reasoning, some are quite forthright and explicit in confirming that their journey began with immorality. For example, former Church of Christ minister John Loftus admits his turn to atheism began with an adulterous affair. Aldous Huxley stated, “We objected to the morality because it interfered with our sexual freedom.”

Regardless of what can be clearly observed in life, the Bible offers the only sure explanation for atheism. It is sin, disobedience, rebellion.

Sigh, I know. Same shit, new day. Everything said above can be summarized with two lies: Atheists suppress the truth in unrighteousness and desire to commit (sexual) immorality. Neither of these claims is true. Besides, as the Black Collar Crime Series clearly shows, the very clerics pontificating about atheist immorality have their own problems, not only with sexual immorality, but with sex crimes.

Shepherds Theological Seminary claims:

The Christian church has felt the attacks and the need to respond to atheists’ philosophical arguments. The church also has felt the heartache of formerly professing Christians renouncing the faith and proudly embracing atheism.

Who are examples of professing Christians who have renounced the faith and PROUDLY embraced atheism?

Just to name a few: Bart Compolo, son of Tony Compolo, prominent sociologist and representative of the evangelical left; Abraham Piper, son of the popular pastor-theologian John Piper; Ken Daniels, formerly a missionary with Wycliffe Bible Translators; Bruce Gerencser, a former pastor in the Baptist Bible Fellowship; and John Loftus, former pastor in the Church of Christ and graduate of Trinity Evangelical Divinity School. In addition to these are many others who have renounced Christianity but would fit better into the category of agnostic—one who says he or she does not or cannot know if there is a God. Much of what is said in this article will relate to agnostics as well.

No, I was never a pastor in the Baptist Bible Fellowship. Not sure where they got that from. Outside of that, I am pleased to be named with Bart Campolo, Abraham Piper, Ken Daniels, and John Loftus. Talk about a rogues’ gallery.

The author of this article lives in deliberate denial of why people, especially pastors and other church professionals, are deconstructing, and often leaving Evangelical Christianity altogether. Contrary to the aforementioned article, there are a plethora of reasons followers of Jesus embrace atheism/agnosticism. Rarely do people deconvert just so they can commit immorality. It is, at best, an exception to the rule. I know a lot of Evangelical-preachers-turned-atheists. Most of them left Christianity for intellectual reasons. This is a fact, as any cursory research will show. The folks as Shepherds Theological Seminary can’t bear to abide by such a thought, so they lie about why people actually deconvert. They can’t fathom someone leaving Evangelicalism for intellectual reasons, so they make up stories about why people deconvert. Perhaps those liars-for-Jesus might want to read what the Bible says about liars. They go where, exactly? The Lake of Fire. The same place the hypocrites at Shepherds Theological Seminary have consigned atheists. And as far as immorality is concerned, either the moralizers at Shepherds Theological Seminary aren’t paying attention to the rampant sexual sin in Evangelicalism or they have their own “secret” sins they are trying to hide by besmirching atheists. Classic “whataboutism,” I’d say. Look over there at those evil immoral atheists, all the while Evangelical preachers are fucking their secretaries, screwing church members, molesting children, and committing the very same immoral behaviors they say atheists are doing.

Bruce Gerencser, 69, lives in rural Northwest Ohio with his wife of 48 years. He and his wife have six grown children and thirteen grandchildren. Bruce pastored Evangelical churches for twenty-five years in Ohio, Texas, and Michigan. Bruce left the ministry in 2005, and in 2008 he left Christianity. Bruce is now a humanist and an atheist.

Your comments are welcome and appreciated. All first-time comments are moderated. Please read the commenting rules before commenting.

You can email Bruce via the Contact Form.

Comments

10 responses to “Why Bruce Gerencser Really Became an Atheist According to Shepherds Theological Seminary”

  1. Avatar
    GeoffT

    The writer of this misguided nonsense clearly has never considered the reality that we do not choose our beliefs, that our beliefs are moulded by thousands of competing pressures that we cannot control. I don’t ‘choose’ to be an atheist, it’s that my mind has not been convinced that any god exists, and I’ve been exposed to far too many arguments as to why the intuitive tendency to attribute the hard questions to the existence of a god are weak when exposed to scrutiny. How many times do we hear, or read, the phrase “I really want to believe you but….” The but is that the evidence suggesting otherwise is so strong that the person concerned has no option in their belief.

    The type of educational establishment that is capable of nurturing the kind of thinking that generated this article has no business in academia.

  2. Avatar
    matilddaa

    Re: Ken Daniels. A personal note. I didn’t know that name till today, Bruce. Newly-wed, we ‘prayed about’ which fundy mission to support. And for over 50yrs, ardently supported Wycliffe Bible Translators. Hubby led one of their home-based UK support groups and was known for his creative leadership. In all that time, attending conferences, reading prayer news, meeting and writing to missionaries, painting their HQ bulldings and more, I never heard mention of any WBT missionaries who gave up. I thought all of them were intrepid, brave pioneers who took their families to live in the most primitive of condititions and spent decades there translating the bible. By coincidence, just last month I heard of Daniel Everitt, another WBT missionary who deconverted. I bought his book. He recounts the incredible hardships of living in the Brazilian jungle. He realised the Pirahas had no concept of saying sorry. Their culture said you only believed an event took place if you, or a close friend or family member had witnessed it personally. They laughed at him for devoting his life to passing on stories that they couldn’t verify, because they took place 2000 yrs ago. He saw that his supposedly all-loving god had allowed this ethnic group to live with these ‘misconceptions’ for two millenia before sending them a white foreigner who would spend decades among them to tell them they’d burn in hell if they didn’t start to wear clothes, learn to read and come-to-jesus. (I shall now buy Ken Daniels book for my upcoming holiday reading!)

    1. Avatar
      Rand

      Ken Daniels’ book Why I Believed: Reflections of a Former Missionary is one of the best arguments against bibliolatry I’ve ever read. Intelligently and compassionately written.

  3. Avatar

    Bruce: “Look over there at those evil immoral atheists, all the while Evangelical preachers are fucking their secretaries, screwing church members, molesting children, and committing the very same immoral behaviors they say atheists are doing.”

    Zoe: This is what was going on in my mind as I read through Bruce. Do they even realize that so many of us left because of the immorality in the church? Or that the immorality in the church is what jump-started doubt or investigation into the truth-claims of the belief.

    A former friend of mine fought back when I challenged her on her affair with a pastor. I urged her to come clean about it and she claimed she didn’t want to hurt the cause of Christ. I looked at her like she was crazy. What? You have already hurt the cause of Christ. You go around discipling young women, all the while behind their backs having sex with a pastor, lying to his wife, your husband and children. You delude yourself thinking you are bringing more into the faith while you screw behind their backs.

    I challenged a former pastor about the appearance of his relationship with a woman in the church that was not his wife. He denied it (but confessed years later). When challenged he blamed the church for not praying for him enough.

    Unknowingly I attended a church where I later found out that an elder in the church had his wife murdered on a stretch of highway I drove on almost every week.

    The seminary needs to respond biblically to themselves. Quit using atheism and atheists as your scapegoats, covering up your own sin.

  4. Heh. Tell me you’ve never talked to an atheist without admitting that you’ve never talked to an atheist. “Why would someone not trust in the truth of the Bible? For answers, we’ll be consulting that well-known authority on people who don’t believe in the Bible — that’s right, the Bible! Where better to get answers about why people might not trust the Bible?”

    They really can’t help themselves, can they?

  5. Admit it, Bruce. You’re out there fornicating and eating shellfish and wearing polyester.
    Everyone knows that’s what atheists live for.

  6. Avatar
    Sharon

    It’s Cary, not Carey. I used to live there.

    1. Avatar

      Thanks for the correction.

  7. Avatar

    Pointing fingers won’t save you Brucey

    1. Avatar

      🖕🏻🖕🏻🖕🏻🖕🏻🖕🏻 pointing fingers at you works for me. You are a dime a dozen troll who is unable to engage in thoughtful discussion and debate. To you, I say, 🖕🏻🖕🏻🖕🏻🖕🏻🍆🍆🍆🍆

Want to Respond to Bruce? Fire Away! If You Are a First Time Commenter, Please Read the Comment Policy Located at the Top of the Page.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Discover more from The Life and Times of Bruce Gerencser

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading