Is Jesus the Most Attested Person in Human History?

jesus most important person in history

Evangelicals make all sorts of claims about God, Jesus, Christianity, and the Bible. Most often, these utterances of certainty are little more than regurgitations of what church members hear from their pastors on Sundays. Unsurprisingly, most Evangelicals don’t regularly read or study the Bible. That’s why, week after week, pastors encourage congregants to read the Bible; to invest time in knowing and understanding the Word of God. Sometimes church members are warned about neglecting the Bible, but these warning often fall on deaf ears. Whatever “Bible” congregants will learn, they will learn it during regularly scheduled church services. Their theology becomes whatever their pastors believe and preach.

Pastors make all sorts of pronouncements from the pulpit, often speaking authoritatively when they have no grounds to do so. Congregants carry these authoritative utterances into the wild, repeating them as if they were gospel. Yesterday, I listened to a young, uneducated Evangelical woman as she claimed that “Jesus is the most attested person in human history.” I laughed as I heard this, knowing she was likely repeating a claim made by her pastor or an apologist. This claim, of course, is a big, fat whopper. While I certainly think Jesus was a historical figure, we know very little about his life. Jesus didn’t leave behind any writings. The gospels were written by unknown authors, decades after the death of Jesus. These gospels tell conflicting stories about the life of Jesus. Outside of the Bible, we have a handful of historical references to Jesus. That’s it. So, to say that Jesus was the most attested person in human history is absurd.

Compare the life of Jesus to that of mine. We know very little about the first thirty years of his life. Most of what we know about Jesus takes place in the last three years of his life. And what we do know often is contradictory. We don’t even know when Jesus was born, whereas the historical record reveals exactly when I was born: date, time, place, attending physician. My life is well attested in oral, written, and photographical form. I am the main subject of this blog, and I have been mentioned in countless books, magazines, newspapers, blogs, and social media sites. When someone does a search on “Bruce Gerencser,” they receive pages and pages of links. It is clear, at least to me, that my life is more attested in human history than that of Jesus. And I suspect the same can be said for many of us. We live in the twenty-first century. We have owned computers and had Internet access for almost 40 years. Data about all of us continues to accumulate, especially for those of us who are public figures. Jesus? We haven’t heard a word from him in two thousand years. All we know about him is recorded in the gospels and a handful of extra-Biblical texts. The most attested person in human history he is not, contrary to what over-confident preachers utter on Sundays.

Bruce Gerencser, 69, lives in rural Northwest Ohio with his wife of 48 years. He and his wife have six grown children and thirteen grandchildren. Bruce pastored Evangelical churches for twenty-five years in Ohio, Texas, and Michigan. Bruce left the ministry in 2005, and in 2008 he left Christianity. Bruce is now a humanist and an atheist.

Your comments are welcome and appreciated. All first-time comments are moderated. Please read the commenting rules before commenting.

You can email Bruce via the Contact Form.

Comments

11 responses to “Is Jesus the Most Attested Person in Human History?”

  1. Avatar
    GeoffT

    I’m less convinced than I was, despite the certainty of the likes of Bart Ehrman, that Jesus actually existed as a person on whom the myth was based, but it’s not something I’m qualified personally to adjudicate. What I do see is that the evidence is very little indeed, something that is consistent with a very minor person in history. The fact is that a massive amount of rumour and misinformation has surrounded this character, leading to the perception that there is more evidence than there actually is. Outside of the gospels there is almost nothing.

  2. If Jesus existed, we know very little about him. The early gospel writers arguably had little or no concern about the parables, miracles, teachings, and life of Jesus on Earth. Only in the book of Mark, written some 40 years after Jesus’ life, do we have a written account of what he did on Earth. Everything else seems to be derived from this one book of Mark. So, was Mark telling the whole truth, a mixture of truth and fiction, or total fiction? We don’t know. But that book is the only primary source we have.

    And Mark sure looks to me like religious fiction, not an historical narrative.

    Matthew takes Mark and rewrites to include a Jewish slant, birth story, resurrection details, and teachings. But Mark is his clear source for most of the story, as he often copies it word for word. So if Mark is fabrication, Matthew is fabrication.

    Luke didn’t like Matthew’s Jewish slant, so he rewrites it from a more universal slant. He does a wholesale rewrite of Matthew in places, outright contradicting Matthew in stories like the birth and resurrection of Jesus. Evidence indicates that he knew Matthew existed, and he didn’t care. Matthew was wrong, so Luke sets out to tell the story he wants people to believe.

    And then John comes along and corrects Luke.

    And then we get a host of other gospels and rewrites of gospels, such as a new ending for Mark, the Gospel of the Hebrews, the Gospel of Peter, etc.

    But all of this ultimately comes from one source, Mark, with additions that appear to come out of nowhere.

    Some have postulated a second early source, Q, which contained the material common to Matthew and Luke. But that is an unconfirmed hypothesis.Thus, where Matthew and Luke agree, the claim is that both used Q. Where they disagree, they both made it up or used different, unknown sources. I find it more likely that Luke had Matthew as a source, and copied Matthew when he liked it, and ignored Matthew’s BS where he wanted to. See https://www.richardcarrier.info/archives/19380 ,

    So, by 75 AD, we most likely have evidence from Mark, no book of Q, and nothing significant in the epistles. Everything else, including the few historical quotes, derives from this.

    You and I were once taken in by the Jesus story. With our background, we are left with a curiosity about what happened and how this story became so popular.

    I understand we differ on the historicity of Jesus, with you supporting the more popular belief that Jesus began as an ordinary man whose followers chose to exalt posthumously as divine and later as God. I respect your position, and that may well be what happened. But I find the mythical position more likely.

    I find the best explanation is that the epistle writers wrote of a mythical Christ Jesus (literally, “annointed Savior”). Mark later rewrote their story as historical fiction, but the masses accepted it and built a new religion based on a historical Jesus. See https://www.amazon.com/Jesus-Outer-Space-Earliest-Christians/dp/1634311949/ .

  3. Avatar

    testing – anyone else having trouble posting a reply?

    1. Avatar

      okay, that worked. will try again on another post

      1. Avatar

        For some reason I cannot post on The Atheist Agenda post.

        1. Avatar

          I’m not sure what the problem is. WordPress and my theme developer pushed out updates at the same time, resulting in a smattering of problems.

          I think the theme is the problem, but, damn, I’m not well enough to mess with it (or anything else). I’ll try to figure this out.

          I’ve been using the same theme for a decade. I like it, but not if people can’t easily comment. Thanks, my friend, for bringing this to my attention. Same goes for people getting the nonce error.

          I used to be on top of shit like this, but those days are gone. I apologize for the inconvenience. 😢😢

          ❤️❤️

          1. Avatar

            I got the nonce error. I knew something was up. No apology needed. <3

        2. Avatar

          By the way, Revival Fires left a vulgar, nasty comment for you. I deleted it. I occasionally approve his comments so thoughtful readers get a glimpse of what I’m dealing with, but most of the time I delete them. He’s one of the worst Christians I’ve ever met, and that’s a rare feat since I’ve met so many Assholes 4 Jesus over the past 20 years.

          1. Avatar
            John S.

            Revival Liars is a jackass. Bruce and Zoe, I’m sorry for the way he behaves. I would love to make the claim that he isn’t a “True Christian ®️”, but unfortunately religious folks like him are more the rule and not the exception in this age of MAGA and Christian nationalism.

            During mass this morning the priest, during his homily, asked an interesting question about this very phenomenon- which is it? What is the adjective and what is the noun? It can’t be both. It’s either “Christianity” or it’s “Nationalism”, at least in his mind.

            I know his thoughts aren’t perfect on this matter, as both labels (“Christian” and “Nationalist”) are very subjective and nuanced.
            In my most imperfect view, I use a very simple test on someone’s humanity- are you a purposeful asshole to other people? If “yes” then nothing you subsequently profess afterwards, whether it is Christianity, Islam, Judaism, Buddhism, atheism, nationalism, communism, etc. matters. I don’t care what your reason for being an asshole is. You’re still an asshole, even if you have a Doctorate of Divinity.

            So nothing Revival Liars claims to be, profess, etc. matters so long as he continues in his jackassery.

          2. Avatar

            Well thank you John S. but you never have to apologize for someone else’s actions/words. He is accountable to his “God” and I am sure his “God” will deal with him as He sees fit.

          3. Avatar

            For me? Rats, missed it. Thank you for sparing me from his diatribe. I might have just told him to get in line. Been there, done that.

Want to Respond to Bruce? Fire Away! If You Are a First Time Commenter, Please Read the Comment Policy Located at the Top of the Page.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Discover more from The Life and Times of Bruce Gerencser

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading