Menu Close

It Only Takes One Errant Word to Destroy the Inerrancy of the Bible

want truth read bible-001

Repost from 2015-2016. Edited, updated, and corrected.

According to most Evangelicals, the Bible is not only inspired (breathed out) by God, it is also infallible and inerrant. (Please see Are Evangelicals Fundamentalists?) Since the Bible was written by men moved by the Holy Spirit or dictated by God, it stands to reason — God being perfect in all His ways — that the Bible is perfect, without error. Some Evangelicals take the notion of inerrancy even further by saying that the King James Version of the Bible is without error. And some Evangelicals — the followers of Peter Ruckman — take it further yet by saying that even the italicized words inserted by the translators of the King James Bible are divinely inspired. Other Evangelicals, thinking of themselves as more educated than other Christians, say that the “original” manuscripts from which English translations come are what are inerrant. Translations, then, are reliable, but not inerrant (even though pastors who believe this often lead churches that are filled with people who believe their leather-bound Bibles are without error). The problem with this belief is that the “originals” don’t exist. Over the years, I ran into countless Christians who believed that these so-called “originals” existed “somewhere” and that they are safely stored “somewhere.” Recently, one such ignorant Evangelical told me that I should read the Dead Sea Scrolls. In doing so, I would see that Christianity is true. Evidently, he didn’t know that the Dead Sea Scrolls don’t mention Jesus, and those who “see” Jesus in the Scrolls are either smoking too much marijuana or are importing their biased theology into the texts. Such is the level of ignorance found not only in pulpits, but in church pews.

Is the Bible in any shape or form inerrant? Of course not. Such a belief cannot rationally or intellectually be sustained. It is nothing more than wishful thinking to believe that the Bible is inerrant — straight from the mouth of God to the ears of Christians.

Dr. Bart Ehrman, a New Testament scholar and professor at the University of North Carolina, answered a question on his blog about whether believing the Bible has errors leads to agnosticism/atheism. Here is part of what Ehrman had to say:

I have never thought that recognizing the historical and literary problems of the Bible would or should lead someone to believe there is no God. The only people who could think such a thing are either Christian fundamentalists or people who have been convinced by fundamentalists (without knowing it, in many instances) that fundamentalist Christianity is the only kind of religion that is valid, and that if the assumptions of fundamentalism is flawed, then there could be no God.  What is the logic of that?  So far as I can see, there is no logic at all.

Christian fundamentalism insists that every word in the Bible has been given directly by God, and that only these words can be trusted as authorities for the existence of God, for the saving doctrines of Christianity, for guidance about what to believe and how to live, and for, in short, everything having to do with religious truth and practice.   For fundamentalists, in theory, if one could prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that any word in the original manuscripts of the Bible was an error, than [sic] the entire edifice of their religious system collapses, and there is nothing left between that and raw atheism.

Virtually everyone who is trained in the critical study of the Bible or in serious theology thinks this is utter nonsense.  And why is it that people at large – not just fundamentalists but even people who are not themselves believers – don’t realize it’s nonsense, that it literally is “non-sense”?  Because fundamentalists have convinced so much of the world that their view is the only right view.  It’s an amazing cultural reality.  But it still makes no sense.

Look at it this way.  Suppose you could show beyond any doubt that the story of Jesus walking on the water was a later legend.  It didn’t really happen.  Either the disciples thought they saw something that really occur [sic], or later story tellers came up with the idea themselves as they were trying to show just how amazing Jesus was, or … or that there is some other explanation?  What relevance would that have to the question of whether there was a divine power who created the universe?  There is *no* necessary relevance.  No necessary connection whatsoever.  Who says that God could not have created the universe unless Jesus walked on water?  It’s a complete non sequitur.

The vast majority of Christians throughout history – the massively vast majority of Christians – have not been fundamentalists.  Most Christians in the world today are not fundamentalists.  So why do we allow fundamentalists to determine what “real” Christianity is?  Or what “true” Christianity is?  Why do we say that if you are not a fundamentalist who maintains that every word in the Bible is literally true and historically accurate that you cannot really be a Christian?

While I question how someone can be a Christian and not believe all that the Bible says is true (perhaps this is the result of a Fundamentalist hangover), I know, as Dr. Ehrman says, that hundreds of millions of people believe in the Christian God, perfect Bible or not. I am not, contrary to what my critics suggest, anti-Christian. I am, however, most certainly anti-Fundamentalist. I am indifferent towards the religious beliefs of billions of people as long as those beliefs don’t harm others. Unfortunately, many Evangelical beliefs and practices ARE harmful, and it is for this reason that I continue to write about Evangelicalism.

Inerrancy is one such harmful belief. Believing that every word of the Bible is inerrant, infallible, and true leads people to false, and at times dangerous, conclusions. Take young earth creationism — the belief that the universe was created in six literal twenty-four days, 6,024 years ago. Men such as Ken Ham continue to infect young minds with creationist beliefs which, thanks to science, we know are not true. The reason the Ken Hams of the world cannot accept what science says about the universe is because they believe the text of the Bible is inerrant. According to inerrantists, the Bible, in most instances, should be read literally. Thus, Genesis 1-3 “clearly” teaches that God created the universe exactly as young earth creationists say He did. This kind of thinking intellectually harms impressionable minds. While little can be done to keep churches, Christian schools, and home schooling parents from teaching children such absurdities, we can and must make sure Evangelical zealots are barred from bringing their nonsense into public school classrooms.

Peel back the issues that drive the culture war and what you will find is the notion that God has infallibly spoken on this or that social issue. Think about it for a moment: name one social hot button issue that doesn’t have Bible proof texts attached to it. Homosexuality? Same-sex marriage? Abortion? Premarital sex? Birth control? Marriage and divorce? Prayer and Bible reading in public schools? Every one of these issues is driven by the belief that the Bible is inerrant and that Christians must dutifully obey every word (though no Evangelicals that I know of believe, obey, and practice every law, command, precept, and teaching of the Bible). Removing the Good Book from the equation forces Evangelicals to contemplate these issues without appeals to Biblical authority and theology. As a secularist, I am more than ready and willing to have discussions with Christians about the important social issues of the day. All that I ask is that they leave their Bibles at home or stuffed under the front seats of their cars. In a secular state, religious texts of any kind carry no weight. What “God” says plays no part in deciding what our laws are. Evangelicals have a hard time understanding this, believing that their flavor of Christianity is the one true faith; believing that their infallible interpretation of a religious text written by their God is absolute truth. It is impossible to reach people who think like this.

While I at one time believed the Bible was the inspired, inerrant, infallible Word of God, it was not until I considered the possibility that the Bible might not be what I claimed it is, that I could then consider alternative ways of looking at the world. This is why I don’t argue about science with Evangelicals. I attack their foundational beliefs — that the Bible is not inerrant; that the Bible is not what they claim it is. Once the foundation is destroyed, it becomes much easier to engage Evangelicals on the issues they think are important. Given enough time, a patient agnostic/atheist/rationalist/skeptic can drive a stake into the heart of their Fundamentalist beliefs. As long as Evangelicals hang on to their “inerrant” Bibles, it is impossible to have meaningful, productive discussions with them. All anyone can do for them is present evidence that eviscerates their inerrantist beliefs. Since Heaven and Hell are fictions of the human mind, I am content to let knowledge do her perfect work. I know that most Evangelicals will never abandon their faith (the one true faith), but some will, so I am content to continue fishing for the minds of women and men. Using reason and knowledge is the only way I know of to make the world a better place. Part of making the world a better place is doing all I can to neuter Fundamentalist beliefs. Inerrancy is one such belief.

bruce-gerencser-headshot

Bruce Gerencser, 65, lives in rural Northwest Ohio with his wife of 44 years. He and his wife have six grown children and thirteen grandchildren. Bruce pastored Evangelical churches for twenty-five years in Ohio, Texas, and Michigan. Bruce left the ministry in 2005, and in 2008 he left Christianity. Bruce is now a humanist and an atheist.

Connect with me on social media:

You can email Bruce via the Contact Form.

Your comments are welcome and appreciated. All first-time comments are moderated. Please read the commenting rules before commenting.

11 Comments

  1. Avatar
    Neil

    “No Evangelicals that I know of believe, obey, and practice every law, command, precept, and teaching of the Bible.”

    Bruce, they don’t even obey the commands of their Lord and savior: Love your neighbor and your enemies; give to all who ask; sell all you have and give to the poor; go the extra mile; turn the other cheek; don’t judge; give your coat if sued for your shirt etc, etc.

    Nobody would care if they weren’t so damned keen to oppress others (women, gay and transgender people) and didn’t spend their time telling the rest of us what to believe and how to live.

    • Avatar
      Rebecca

      I totally agree with Dr. Ehrman’s comments. He has hit the nail right on the head. No one could have stated this any better.

      As important as Scripture is in the faith and practice of the church, I think Christians should not fall into a kind of idolotry of the Bible. We should be even more focused on the incarnation, and then walking out the commands of Jesus to love both our neighbors and our enemies.

  2. Avatar
    anotherami

    I think the doctrine of inerrancy is the core fallacy of fundamentalism, with Calvinism being a particularly vile strain. I was not originally taught inerrancy and I doubt it would have survived my first year of Brownies. Back then, we recited the Lord’s Prayer as part of certain Brownie functions and I noticed that we didn’t all recite the same words. If they can’t even agree on whether it’s “sins”. “trespasses”. or “transgressions” in one little prayer, then how in the hell could they translate all those words in the Bible for all those centuries and never have made a single mistake? Even as an 8-year old, I couldn’t believe that.

    • Avatar
      Byroniac

      One Biblical example that bothered me are the different orders of the temptations of Jesus in the wilderness comparing Matthew 4 with Luke 4, where both accounts agree only on the first temptation and disagree on the order of the other two. This is not necessarily fatal to Christianity. I asked my very devout sister about this (who recently passed away, so I can no longer ask her any questions), and I believe this was new to her but it did not shake her faith. I think it bothered me more than it bothered her! But if anyone needs concrete proof that “alleged” contradictions exist, that is certainly at least one good example, which may have very likely existed in the original autographs (my guess, though how can we know, since they very likely no longer exist?).

  3. Avatar
    William

    I think that a lack of errors is very important to a person’s belief in God, or more accurately, the Christian God and the path of salvation.

    Let me give an example, Jehovahs Witnesses don’t believe in a literal hell. Supposing they are right and Jesus’s story about the rich man in hell is not literal, but it’s just a story. How can a Christian know what to believe or to know how to refute anything?

    Biblical errancy is of course very important to a religion which is based on a book.

  4. Avatar
    BJW

    And…it’s completely ridiculous to hold onto inerrancy for the Bible. Fundamentalist/evangelists have to close their eyes to facts about the Bible and historical discrepancies, facts easily found on the internet. But I remember my not-quite-fundamentalist religion wanted us to guard ourselves from knowledge outside of the Bible that overturned creationism and the flood, for a start. There is something wrong with religious leaders trying to keep us from learning. Even the Dalai Lama has stated if science proves his beliefs are inaccurate, then he would believe the science.

  5. Avatar
    Barbara L. Jackson

    I am an agnostic. I would like it if more Christian groups would let others live their lives without interfering. I used a progesterone releasing IUD (removed and re-introduced each year) for years because taking the pill would have interfered with my anti-seizure medications. I had to be careful who I talked to because many of them thought I was the living devil for using an IUD. I eventually had my tubes tied.

    THIS IS WHERE CHRISTIANS DO HARM. They are not neurologists and do not know the details about treating seizures.

    Would it be possible to have some sort of law to stop people from forcing their religion on others?

    Thank you

    • Avatar
      theologyarchaeology

      To Ms. Jackson–right after a law is passed stopping unbelievers from forcing their ways onto churches and Christians

      • Avatar
        William

        If you mean that abuse shouldn’t be punished by the authorities instead dealt hush hush by the Pastor or a committee then no. 1 shame on you and no. 2 the bible tells you to submit yourself to the authorities because you have nothing to fear unless you have something to hide/doing something wrong. Are you?

        Otherwise the vast majority of people don’t care what Christians are doing in churches on a Sunday morning whilst they are having a well deserved late rise or a lazy breakfast.

      • Avatar
        BJW

        Theologyarchaelogy, you’re just mad because you can’t force us to believe the way you do. You don’t want Christians to be equal, you want them to continue to dominate and rule the rest of us. That is what is really upsetting you all. You want to set up a kingdom in the US, but you intend to restrict freedom. Well, we are going to fight you to the bitter end over it. Why don’t you just go away and enjoy your little slice of Christianity, and leave us alone?

Want to Respond to Bruce? Fire Away! If You Are a First Time Commenter, Please Read the Comment Policy Located at the Top of the Page.

Bruce Gerencser